Intraocular Pressure Changes After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection Alone or Combination of Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone Acetonide

N. Barakat, Y. Suleiman, Kahtan Jalloul
{"title":"Intraocular Pressure Changes After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection Alone or Combination of Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone Acetonide","authors":"N. Barakat, Y. Suleiman, Kahtan Jalloul","doi":"10.11648/J.IJHNM.20200602.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab alone or in combination with Triamcinolone Acetonide. Method: Our study included 63 eyes from the ophthalmology department at Tishreen University Hospital who had vascular retinal diseases. The patients were divided into two groups according to the indication of injection. The first group was injected with bevacizumab (B) at a concentration of 2.5mg / 0.1 ml and the second group was injected with the combination treatment of Triamcinolone Acetonide at a concentration of 2mg / 0.05ml with bevacizumab (B+TA) at a concentration of 1.25mg/ 0.05ml. Intraocular pressure was monitored on the Goldman applanation tonometry and values were recorded as follows: before injection, the second injection day, a week after injection, a month after injection and after three months. Results: The mean values of the intraocular pressure mean increased from the second day of injection in the study groups (B) and (B+TA) and the mean of the IOP values before injection (13.34-13.31 mmHg) respectively, and the IOP values showed the maximum in both groups after a week of the injection (17.81-17.31 mmHg) then began to decrease after a month and three months later to (17.34-17.06mmHg) and (17.6-16.75mmHg) mercury respectively, but they remained higher than they were before the injection, and the number of injections had no effect on intraocular pressure. Conclusion: intravitreal injections with both bevacizumab alone or in combination with triamcinolone acetonide resulted in a rise in intraocular pressure, and differences in pressure values were statistically significant within the same group during the studied time periods but were not statistically significant between the two groups, and the number of injections had no effect on intraocular pressure.","PeriodicalId":170473,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Homeopathy & Natural Medicines","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Homeopathy & Natural Medicines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJHNM.20200602.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab alone or in combination with Triamcinolone Acetonide. Method: Our study included 63 eyes from the ophthalmology department at Tishreen University Hospital who had vascular retinal diseases. The patients were divided into two groups according to the indication of injection. The first group was injected with bevacizumab (B) at a concentration of 2.5mg / 0.1 ml and the second group was injected with the combination treatment of Triamcinolone Acetonide at a concentration of 2mg / 0.05ml with bevacizumab (B+TA) at a concentration of 1.25mg/ 0.05ml. Intraocular pressure was monitored on the Goldman applanation tonometry and values were recorded as follows: before injection, the second injection day, a week after injection, a month after injection and after three months. Results: The mean values of the intraocular pressure mean increased from the second day of injection in the study groups (B) and (B+TA) and the mean of the IOP values before injection (13.34-13.31 mmHg) respectively, and the IOP values showed the maximum in both groups after a week of the injection (17.81-17.31 mmHg) then began to decrease after a month and three months later to (17.34-17.06mmHg) and (17.6-16.75mmHg) mercury respectively, but they remained higher than they were before the injection, and the number of injections had no effect on intraocular pressure. Conclusion: intravitreal injections with both bevacizumab alone or in combination with triamcinolone acetonide resulted in a rise in intraocular pressure, and differences in pressure values were statistically significant within the same group during the studied time periods but were not statistically significant between the two groups, and the number of injections had no effect on intraocular pressure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝伐单抗玻璃体内单独注射或贝伐单抗与曲安奈德联合注射后眼压变化
目的:评价贝伐单抗单独或联合曲安奈德玻璃体内注射后眼压的变化。方法:本研究纳入天津大学附属医院眼科血管性视网膜疾病患者63只眼。根据注射指征分为两组。第一组注射浓度为2.5mg / 0.1 ml的贝伐珠单抗(B),第二组注射浓度为2mg / 0.05ml的曲安奈德与浓度为1.25mg/ 0.05ml的贝伐珠单抗(B+TA)联合治疗。在Goldman眼压仪上监测眼压,分别记录注射前、注射第二天、注射后一周、注射后一个月、注射后三个月的眼压。结果:眼压的平均值的意思是增加注入的第二天的学习小组(B)和(B +助教)和眼压值的均值分别注入(13.34 - -13.31毫米汞柱),之前和眼压值显示的最大一个星期后两组注射(17.81 - -17.31毫米汞柱),那么开始减少一个月后,三个月后(17.34 - -17.06毫米汞柱),水星(17.6 - -16.75毫米汞柱),但他们仍高于注射之前,注射次数对眼压无明显影响。结论:玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗或联合曲安奈德均可导致眼压升高,研究时间段内同一组内眼压值差异有统计学意义,两组间差异无统计学意义,注射次数对眼压无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants and Conservation Status Used to Treat Human and Livestock Ailments in Fadis District, Eastern Ethiopia Under Nutrition and Its Determinants among Adults Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Review of Phytochemical Analysis of Selected Traditional Medicinal Plants in Ethiopia Intraocular Pressure Changes After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection Alone or Combination of Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone Acetonide Dryness of the Oral Cavity in the Salivary Status of Overweight Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1