Aesthetics as Knowledge: An Aspect of the Future of Knowledge Management?

Clemen Kerschbaum
{"title":"Aesthetics as Knowledge: An Aspect of the Future of Knowledge Management?","authors":"Clemen Kerschbaum","doi":"10.34190/eckm.24.1.1667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge Management (KM) is concerned with the process of capturing, organizing, sharing or utilizing knowledge within an organization. At least since the works of Nonaka and Takeuchi in the 90s, it is a commonplace that the term knowledge, as understood from the perspective of KM, includes both explicit and tacit elements. However, it seems that the focus of many KM initiatives and resulting KM systems still lies mostly on the more explicit facets of knowledge. This has two implications for the field: the first is the obvious danger of confusing knowledge management with information management. The second, which is actually a consequence of the first, is that the focus on technology and explicit knowledge can lead to a diffusion of the field of KM towards more technical domains such as Semantic Web, Knowledge Graphs or Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Those fields have arguably become way more capable of managing explicit knowledge and draw the attention of companies away from ‘traditional’ KM systems (Davenport, 2015). Thus, in this paper, I argue that KM research should somewhat reconsider its strengths which lie in the management of tacit knowledge that is closely tied to humans. Following this argument, I propose organizational aesthetics as one of many promising avenues for KM research in the future. The idea for this stems from a recent literature review on organizational aesthetics that identifies three perspectives on the topic – one being aesthetics as a knowledge tool (Baldessarelli, Stigliani and Elsbach, 2022). According to this perspective, aesthetics is seen as a form of knowledge that originates in sensory perceptions and is permanently deployed in the interaction with organizations, organizational artifacts, and social settings. The present paper hence aims to contextualize the notion of organizational aesthetics for the field of KM to give an overview of the idea and offer a basis for discussion on whether aesthetics could be a useful field for future inquiry.","PeriodicalId":107011,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.1.1667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge Management (KM) is concerned with the process of capturing, organizing, sharing or utilizing knowledge within an organization. At least since the works of Nonaka and Takeuchi in the 90s, it is a commonplace that the term knowledge, as understood from the perspective of KM, includes both explicit and tacit elements. However, it seems that the focus of many KM initiatives and resulting KM systems still lies mostly on the more explicit facets of knowledge. This has two implications for the field: the first is the obvious danger of confusing knowledge management with information management. The second, which is actually a consequence of the first, is that the focus on technology and explicit knowledge can lead to a diffusion of the field of KM towards more technical domains such as Semantic Web, Knowledge Graphs or Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Those fields have arguably become way more capable of managing explicit knowledge and draw the attention of companies away from ‘traditional’ KM systems (Davenport, 2015). Thus, in this paper, I argue that KM research should somewhat reconsider its strengths which lie in the management of tacit knowledge that is closely tied to humans. Following this argument, I propose organizational aesthetics as one of many promising avenues for KM research in the future. The idea for this stems from a recent literature review on organizational aesthetics that identifies three perspectives on the topic – one being aesthetics as a knowledge tool (Baldessarelli, Stigliani and Elsbach, 2022). According to this perspective, aesthetics is seen as a form of knowledge that originates in sensory perceptions and is permanently deployed in the interaction with organizations, organizational artifacts, and social settings. The present paper hence aims to contextualize the notion of organizational aesthetics for the field of KM to give an overview of the idea and offer a basis for discussion on whether aesthetics could be a useful field for future inquiry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为知识的美学:知识管理未来的一个方面?
知识管理(Knowledge Management, KM)关注的是组织内部知识的获取、组织、共享或利用过程。至少从90年代野中和竹内的作品开始,从KM的角度来理解,“知识”一词包含显性和隐性两个要素,这已经是老生常谈了。然而,似乎许多知识管理计划和由此产生的知识管理系统的焦点仍然主要集中在知识的更明确的方面。这对该领域有两个含义:首先是将知识管理与信息管理混淆的明显危险。第二点,实际上是第一点的结果,即对技术和显性知识的关注可以导致知识管理领域向更多技术领域的扩散,如语义网、知识图或机器学习和人工智能。可以说,这些领域已经变得更有能力管理显性知识,并将公司的注意力从“传统”知识管理系统中吸引出来(Davenport, 2015)。因此,在本文中,我认为知识管理研究应该在一定程度上重新考虑其优势在于与人类密切相关的隐性知识的管理。根据这一论点,我提出组织美学是未来知识管理研究的许多有前途的途径之一。这个想法源于最近对组织美学的文献综述,该综述确定了关于该主题的三个观点-一个是将美学作为知识工具(Baldessarelli, Stigliani和Elsbach, 2022)。根据这一观点,美学被视为一种知识形式,起源于感官知觉,并永久地部署在与组织、组织工件和社会环境的互动中。因此,本文旨在将组织美学的概念置于知识管理领域的语境中,对这一概念进行概述,并为讨论美学是否可以成为未来研究的有用领域提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Psychological Contracts in Knowledge Sharing Through Startups Knowledge Transfer in the Craft Beer Business Networks in Portugal Meaning of the Power Users in the Wikipedia Working Environment Effectiveness of the Lessons Learned Process in ESA OPS Directorate Knowledge Management and Interorganizational Networks of the Wine Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1