Challenging Issues of Restitution of Civil Rights of Parties to Economic Relations

A. B. Stepin
{"title":"Challenging Issues of Restitution of Civil Rights of Parties to Economic Relations","authors":"A. B. Stepin","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-3-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The restoration of violated (disputed) civil rights in the sphere of economic relations is a complex intersectoral concept that represents the results of protective legal activity. Being derived from the content of the right to protection (Article 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation), restoration takes the appropriate forms of law-making (federal, regional, municipal), regulatory (normative, local, judicial, administrative), law enforcement (restorative, punitive), legal explanatory (domestic, international). Expressing the legal activity of the subjects of the right to protection and the subjects of the implementation of this right, the methods of restoring civil rights take place in a conflict legal relationship in the presence of a violated (disputed) right. In the absence of these conditions, the protective activity becomes imaginary, since it does not generate legal consequences for the applicant, and the adopted law enforcement act in such conditions is unenforceable. The protection of civil rights in the civil and administrative order is based on the observance by the parties to the conflict of the officially established order (procedure). Failure to comply with the requirements for the form of protection and the procedure is not allowed to exercise the right to satisfy the stated requirements and, as a result, restore the right.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-3-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The restoration of violated (disputed) civil rights in the sphere of economic relations is a complex intersectoral concept that represents the results of protective legal activity. Being derived from the content of the right to protection (Article 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation), restoration takes the appropriate forms of law-making (federal, regional, municipal), regulatory (normative, local, judicial, administrative), law enforcement (restorative, punitive), legal explanatory (domestic, international). Expressing the legal activity of the subjects of the right to protection and the subjects of the implementation of this right, the methods of restoring civil rights take place in a conflict legal relationship in the presence of a violated (disputed) right. In the absence of these conditions, the protective activity becomes imaginary, since it does not generate legal consequences for the applicant, and the adopted law enforcement act in such conditions is unenforceable. The protection of civil rights in the civil and administrative order is based on the observance by the parties to the conflict of the officially established order (procedure). Failure to comply with the requirements for the form of protection and the procedure is not allowed to exercise the right to satisfy the stated requirements and, as a result, restore the right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济关系当事人民事权利恢复的挑战问题
在经济关系领域恢复被侵犯的(有争议的)公民权利是一个复杂的跨部门概念,代表了保护性法律活动的结果。恢复源于受保护权的内容(俄罗斯联邦宪法第45条),采取适当的立法形式(联邦、地区、市)、监管形式(规范、地方、司法、行政)、执法形式(恢复性、惩罚性)、法律解释形式(国内、国际)。民事权利恢复的方式表现了权利受保护人的法律活动和权利行使人的法律活动,发生在权利受到侵犯(争议)的冲突法律关系中。在没有这些条件的情况下,保护活动就变成了想象,因为它不会对申请人产生法律后果,并且在这种情况下通过的执法行为是不可执行的。民事和行政秩序中对公民权利的保护是以冲突各方遵守正式确立的秩序(程序)为基础的。不符合保护形式和程序要求的人,不得行使权利以满足所述要求,从而恢复该权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1