The New Unesco Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO?

C. B. Graber
{"title":"The New Unesco Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO?","authors":"C. B. Graber","doi":"10.1093/JIEL/JGL018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 20 October 2005, the 33rd UNESCO General Conference adopted by a majority of 148 votes to two the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (CCD). The major objectives of the CCD are the recognition of the dual nature of cultural expressions as objects of trade and artefacts of cultural value and the recognition of the sovereign right of governments to formulate and implement cultural policies and measures for the protection and promotion of cultural diversity. The ambitious role assigned to the CCD by its proponents is to fill an existing lacuna for cultural objectives in public international law and to serve as a cultural counterbalance to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in future conflicts between trade and culture. Opponents, however, have criticized the CCD as an instrument of disguised protectionism and claimed that it violates freedom of expression and information. This article endeavours to explain how cultural diversity has become an issue of international law and provides a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the CCD. It explores in particular the possible linkages between the CCD and the WTO. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":223925,"journal":{"name":"OUP: Journal of International Economic Law","volume":"227 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUP: Journal of International Economic Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIEL/JGL018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

On 20 October 2005, the 33rd UNESCO General Conference adopted by a majority of 148 votes to two the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (CCD). The major objectives of the CCD are the recognition of the dual nature of cultural expressions as objects of trade and artefacts of cultural value and the recognition of the sovereign right of governments to formulate and implement cultural policies and measures for the protection and promotion of cultural diversity. The ambitious role assigned to the CCD by its proponents is to fill an existing lacuna for cultural objectives in public international law and to serve as a cultural counterbalance to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in future conflicts between trade and culture. Opponents, however, have criticized the CCD as an instrument of disguised protectionism and claimed that it violates freedom of expression and information. This article endeavours to explain how cultural diversity has become an issue of international law and provides a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the CCD. It explores in particular the possible linkages between the CCD and the WTO. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合国教科文组织文化多样性新公约:与WTO抗衡?
2005年10月20日,联合国教科文组织第33届大会以148票对2票的多数通过了《保护和促进文化表现形式多样性公约》(CCD)。《公约》的主要目标是承认文化表现形式作为贸易对象和具有文化价值的文物的双重性质,并承认政府制定和实施保护和促进文化多样性的文化政策和措施的主权权利。《公约》的支持者赋予其雄心勃勃的作用是填补国际公法中文化目标的现有空白,并在未来贸易与文化之间的冲突中作为世界贸易组织(WTO)的文化平衡。然而,反对者批评CCD是变相保护主义的工具,并声称它侵犯了言论和信息自由。本文试图解释文化多样性如何成为国际法的一个问题,并对《公约》的优缺点进行了批判性评估。它特别探讨了《公约》与世贸组织之间可能的联系。牛津大学出版社版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes A New Dominant Trade Species Emerges: Is Bilateralism a Threat? The New Unesco Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO? The Myth of 'Rebalancing' Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice The Sutherland Report: A Missed Opportunity for Genuine Debate on Trade, Globalization and Reforming the WTO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1