Non-Contributory Social Transfer Programmes in Developing Countries: A New Data Set and Research Agenda

M. Dodlova, A. Giolbas, J. Lay
{"title":"Non-Contributory Social Transfer Programmes in Developing Countries: A New Data Set and Research Agenda","authors":"M. Dodlova, A. Giolbas, J. Lay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2841159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social transfer programmes in developing countries are designed to contribute to poverty reduction by increasing the income of the poor in order to ensure minimal living standards. In addition, social transfers provide a safety net for the vulnerable, who are typically not covered by contributory social security. The question of how effective such programmes are in achieving these aims has been the subject of numerous impact evaluations. However, the optimal design of such programmes is still unclear. Even less is known about whether the adoption and implementation of transfer programmes is really driven by poverty and neediness or whether other factors also have an influence. To investigate these and other research questions, we have developed a new data set entitled Non‐Contributory Social Transfer Programmes (NSTP) in Developing Countries. One advantage of this data set is that it traces 186 non‐contributory programmes from 101 countries back in time and presents them in panel form for the period up until 2015. The second advantage is that it contains all the details regarding the various programmes’ designs as well as information on costs and coverage in a coded format and thus facilitates both comparative quantitative and in-depth qualitative analyses. While describing the data we discuss a number of examples of how the data set can be used to explore different issues related to social policies in developing countries. We present suggestive evidence that the adoption of social transfer programmes is not based only on pro‐poor motives, but rather that social policy choices differ between political regimes.","PeriodicalId":316250,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Social transfer programmes in developing countries are designed to contribute to poverty reduction by increasing the income of the poor in order to ensure minimal living standards. In addition, social transfers provide a safety net for the vulnerable, who are typically not covered by contributory social security. The question of how effective such programmes are in achieving these aims has been the subject of numerous impact evaluations. However, the optimal design of such programmes is still unclear. Even less is known about whether the adoption and implementation of transfer programmes is really driven by poverty and neediness or whether other factors also have an influence. To investigate these and other research questions, we have developed a new data set entitled Non‐Contributory Social Transfer Programmes (NSTP) in Developing Countries. One advantage of this data set is that it traces 186 non‐contributory programmes from 101 countries back in time and presents them in panel form for the period up until 2015. The second advantage is that it contains all the details regarding the various programmes’ designs as well as information on costs and coverage in a coded format and thus facilitates both comparative quantitative and in-depth qualitative analyses. While describing the data we discuss a number of examples of how the data set can be used to explore different issues related to social policies in developing countries. We present suggestive evidence that the adoption of social transfer programmes is not based only on pro‐poor motives, but rather that social policy choices differ between political regimes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家的非缴费性社会转移支付方案:一个新的数据集和研究议程
发展中国家的社会转移方案旨在通过增加穷人的收入以确保最低生活水平来促进减少贫穷。此外,社会转移支付为弱势群体提供了安全网,他们通常不受缴费社会保障的保护。这些方案在实现这些目标方面是否有效的问题一直是许多影响评价的主题。然而,这些方案的最佳设计仍不清楚。至于转移支付方案的通过和执行是否真的是由贫穷和需要推动的,或者其他因素是否也有影响,就更不清楚了。为了调查这些和其他研究问题,我们开发了一个名为“发展中国家非缴费性社会转移计划”(NSTP)的新数据集。该数据集的一个优点是,它追溯了101个国家的186个非缴费项目,并以小组形式呈现了截至2015年的数据。第二个优点是,它以编码格式载有关于各种方案设计的所有细节以及关于费用和覆盖范围的资料,从而有助于进行比较的数量和深入的质量分析。在描述数据时,我们讨论了如何使用该数据集来探索与发展中国家社会政策相关的不同问题的一些例子。我们提出了具有启发性的证据,表明社会转移计划的采用不仅基于有利于穷人的动机,而且还基于不同政治制度的社会政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumer Preference for Car Sharing and the Role of Car Plate Lottery Policy: A Stated Preference Experiment in Beijing Interpersonal Comparisons of What? The Role of Informal Housing in Lowering China’s Urbanization Costs Social Finance Politics of Cultural Commons: A Case Study of Sacred Groves in Central Kerala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1