Jones v. Harris Associates L.P.: The Search for Investor Protection Continues...

Mark Andreu, Ryan John Bollman
{"title":"Jones v. Harris Associates L.P.: The Search for Investor Protection Continues...","authors":"Mark Andreu, Ryan John Bollman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1627369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mutual fund investors have been and continue to be without representation in the fee negotiation room. This should come as no surprise since a mutual fund is the creation of its adviser. As a result, mutual fund advisers are handsomely rewarded to the point of excess. This article discusses the conflicted nature of the mutual fund structure, traces the development of law directed at remedying the problems faced by investors, and offers a new approach that is tailored to correct the shortcomings of the industry.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1627369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mutual fund investors have been and continue to be without representation in the fee negotiation room. This should come as no surprise since a mutual fund is the creation of its adviser. As a result, mutual fund advisers are handsomely rewarded to the point of excess. This article discusses the conflicted nature of the mutual fund structure, traces the development of law directed at remedying the problems faced by investors, and offers a new approach that is tailored to correct the shortcomings of the industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
琼斯诉哈里斯律师事务所:继续寻求投资者保护
共同基金投资者在费用谈判室一直没有代表,而且将继续没有代表。这不足为奇,因为共同基金是由其顾问创造的。因此,共同基金顾问获得了丰厚的回报,甚至到了过度的地步。本文讨论了共同基金结构的冲突性质,追溯了旨在纠正投资者面临的问题的法律的发展,并提供了一种量身定制的新方法来纠正该行业的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are M&A Lawyers Really Better? Hidden Agendas in Shareholder Voting A Right For Retirement: Unconscionable Contracts, The Right (Not) to Associate, and Citizens United Will Nasdaq's Diversity Rules Harm Investors? A Trans-Atlantic Doctrinal Orientation Made Concrete: Ohio’s First 'Modern' Business Corporation Act (1927)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1