Fast Multigrid Solvers for Calibration and Estimation of Dynamic Structural Models

Adam Speight
{"title":"Fast Multigrid Solvers for Calibration and Estimation of Dynamic Structural Models","authors":"Adam Speight","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1347506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new methodology for calibrating parameters when working with intractable, dynamic structural models is developed. A straight-forward extension also allows for formal estimation and hypothesis testing in a Generalized Method of Moment framework. The method is based on multigrid techniques used in many state of the art solvers from engineering applications. These techniques are adapted to solve Bellman and Euler-type equations and to handle subtleties arising from the interaction of statistical and numerical errors. The method works on a joint mode of analysis incorporating both statistical and numerical errors in the spirit of \"forward-backward\" error analysis of Kubler and Schmedders (2005). Numerical results from example problems - and experience from thirty years of multigrid literature - support the papers main finding: a fully-identified model that is smooth in parameters can be calibrated and solved with only about three to five times the work required to solve the model and compute associated \"moments\" for a single set of parameters. As with other multigrid methods, the solvers can be efficiently and naturally implemented on parallel processors. This work also shows that the size of numerical error can be less important than the qualitative type of error when parameters are fitted to a numerically solved model subject to discretization error. An example is presented in which a popular, consistent discretization of a portfolio problem with endogenous retirement produces an ill-posed, unstable calibration problem. This example and subsequent analysis show greater care must be taken when discretizing a model for a calibration or estimation problem: To avoid corrupting sensitivity analysis, identification, and inference, it is important to perform a joint error analysis that includes both discretization and statistical errors.","PeriodicalId":346619,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Computable General Equilibrium Models (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Computable General Equilibrium Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1347506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A new methodology for calibrating parameters when working with intractable, dynamic structural models is developed. A straight-forward extension also allows for formal estimation and hypothesis testing in a Generalized Method of Moment framework. The method is based on multigrid techniques used in many state of the art solvers from engineering applications. These techniques are adapted to solve Bellman and Euler-type equations and to handle subtleties arising from the interaction of statistical and numerical errors. The method works on a joint mode of analysis incorporating both statistical and numerical errors in the spirit of "forward-backward" error analysis of Kubler and Schmedders (2005). Numerical results from example problems - and experience from thirty years of multigrid literature - support the papers main finding: a fully-identified model that is smooth in parameters can be calibrated and solved with only about three to five times the work required to solve the model and compute associated "moments" for a single set of parameters. As with other multigrid methods, the solvers can be efficiently and naturally implemented on parallel processors. This work also shows that the size of numerical error can be less important than the qualitative type of error when parameters are fitted to a numerically solved model subject to discretization error. An example is presented in which a popular, consistent discretization of a portfolio problem with endogenous retirement produces an ill-posed, unstable calibration problem. This example and subsequent analysis show greater care must be taken when discretizing a model for a calibration or estimation problem: To avoid corrupting sensitivity analysis, identification, and inference, it is important to perform a joint error analysis that includes both discretization and statistical errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态结构模型标定与估计的快速多网格求解方法
本文提出了一种新的方法来标定复杂的动态结构模型的参数。一个直接的扩展也允许在广义矩法框架中进行形式估计和假设检验。该方法基于多网格技术,这些技术在许多工程应用的最先进的求解器中使用。这些技术适用于解决Bellman和euler型方程,并处理由统计和数值误差相互作用引起的微妙问题。该方法以Kubler和Schmedders(2005)的“前向后”误差分析的精神,结合了统计误差和数值误差的联合分析模式。来自实例问题的数值结果——以及来自三十年多网格文献的经验——支持了论文的主要发现:一个参数平滑的完全识别模型可以被校准和求解,而求解模型和计算单个参数集的相关“矩”所需的工作量仅为3到5倍。与其他多网格方法一样,求解器可以高效、自然地在并行处理器上实现。这项工作还表明,当参数拟合到受离散化误差影响的数值求解模型时,数值误差的大小可能不如定性误差重要。给出了一个例子,其中一个流行的,具有内生退休的组合问题的一致离散化产生了一个不适定的,不稳定的校准问题。这个例子和随后的分析表明,在为校准或估计问题离散化模型时必须更加小心:为了避免破坏敏感性分析、识别和推理,执行包括离散化和统计误差的联合误差分析是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Environmental Tax Reform in Japan An Empirical Equilibrium Model of Formal and Informal Credit Markets in Developing Countries Bank Lending, Financial Frictions, and Inside Money Creation Robust Predictions for DSGE Models with Incomplete Information Evaluating Central Banks&Apos; Tool Kit: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1