D. H. Lawrence’s Etruscan Places. A Modernist Revaluation of Temporality

Camelia Anghel
{"title":"D. H. Lawrence’s Etruscan Places. A Modernist Revaluation of Temporality","authors":"Camelia Anghel","doi":"10.31178/ubr.10.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the literary modes of constructing temporality in D. H. Lawrence’s Etruscan Places (1932), a travel book written in 1927 and published posthumously. Typically for the first decades of the twentieth century, the work reflects the writer’s anxieties about war force, scientific discoveries and cultural exhaustion in a series of interrelated essays on the remnants of ancient Etruria and the powerful memory of Etruscan civilization. In this article, Etruscan Places is read like a subjective re-creation of a lost civilization; it is interpreted as the writing of an imaginary philosophy attributed to an ancient people and modelled on Lawrence’s personal engagement with the renewal of life potentialities. Patterning his book on the past-present opposition, the author recuperates the Etruscan past within the mythical framework of modernist coherence. The repeated movements between the lost Etruscan world and the writer’s mostly disappointing contemporary age reveal the possibility of establishing continuities not only on an anthropological plane, but also on a philosophical-aesthetic one. The Etruscans’ narrative of death brings to light an art of living; the historical perspective blends with existential and artistic considerations. Lawrence’s exploratory technique is based on similitudes and antitheses, being literarily rendered by a cross-cultural discourse that combines the factual with the fictional, and the epic with the lyric. The British author’s style puts forward repetition as a modernist rhetorical achievement that indirectly questions the validity of literary tradition. Furthermore, the explicit intertextuality of the book completes the writer’s modernist perspective, authenticating the cultural substance of the temporal links that Lawrence seeks to uncover.","PeriodicalId":306553,"journal":{"name":"University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/ubr.10.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the literary modes of constructing temporality in D. H. Lawrence’s Etruscan Places (1932), a travel book written in 1927 and published posthumously. Typically for the first decades of the twentieth century, the work reflects the writer’s anxieties about war force, scientific discoveries and cultural exhaustion in a series of interrelated essays on the remnants of ancient Etruria and the powerful memory of Etruscan civilization. In this article, Etruscan Places is read like a subjective re-creation of a lost civilization; it is interpreted as the writing of an imaginary philosophy attributed to an ancient people and modelled on Lawrence’s personal engagement with the renewal of life potentialities. Patterning his book on the past-present opposition, the author recuperates the Etruscan past within the mythical framework of modernist coherence. The repeated movements between the lost Etruscan world and the writer’s mostly disappointing contemporary age reveal the possibility of establishing continuities not only on an anthropological plane, but also on a philosophical-aesthetic one. The Etruscans’ narrative of death brings to light an art of living; the historical perspective blends with existential and artistic considerations. Lawrence’s exploratory technique is based on similitudes and antitheses, being literarily rendered by a cross-cultural discourse that combines the factual with the fictional, and the epic with the lyric. The British author’s style puts forward repetition as a modernist rhetorical achievement that indirectly questions the validity of literary tradition. Furthermore, the explicit intertextuality of the book completes the writer’s modernist perspective, authenticating the cultural substance of the temporal links that Lawrence seeks to uncover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
d·h·劳伦斯的《伊特鲁里亚地方》现代主义者对时间性的重新评价
本文探讨了d.h.劳伦斯于1927年出版的游记《伊特鲁里亚地方》(1932)中建构时间性的文学模式。在20世纪头几十年的典型作品中,这部作品反映了作者对战争力量、科学发现和文化枯竭的焦虑,通过一系列有关古代伊特鲁里亚遗迹和伊特鲁里亚文明的强大记忆的相互关联的文章。在这篇文章中,《伊特鲁里亚地方》读起来就像是对一个失落文明的主观再现;它被解释为一种虚构的哲学,被认为是一个古老的民族,并以劳伦斯个人对生命潜力的更新的参与为蓝本。作者以过去和现在的对立为蓝本,在现代主义连贯性的神话框架内恢复了伊特鲁里亚人的过去。失落的伊特鲁里亚世界与作家最令人失望的当代之间的反复运动揭示了不仅在人类学层面上,而且在哲学美学层面上建立连续性的可能性。伊特鲁里亚人对死亡的叙述揭示了一种生活的艺术;历史的视角融合了存在主义和艺术的考虑。劳伦斯的探索技巧以类比和对立为基础,通过跨文化话语将事实与虚构、史诗与抒情结合在一起进行文学呈现。这位英国作家的风格将重复作为一种现代主义修辞成就提出,间接质疑文学传统的有效性。此外,书中明确的互文性完成了作者的现代主义视角,证实了劳伦斯试图揭示的时间联系的文化实质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity of Womanist Ethos: Intertextuality in Select Novels of Alice Walker A ‘Palimpestuous’ Reading of Lisa Strøme’s The Strawberry Girl Evelyn Waugh’s War Novels in Francoist Spain Memory and nostalgia: pre-reform Russia in the minds of the Russian nobility of the second half of the 19th century Revising the Black decolonialization process: Kendrick Lamar’s DAMN. and the poetics of violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1