Using Backchanneling Technology to Facilitate Dialogic Discussions about Literature

J. Chisholm
{"title":"Using Backchanneling Technology to Facilitate Dialogic Discussions about Literature","authors":"J. Chisholm","doi":"10.1108/S2048-045820180000009006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPurpose – The purpose of this study was to understand how, if at all, backchanneling technology supported an early career English teacher’s facilitation of literary discussions in his 10th grade classroom. Although emerging findings from studies of backchanneling in teaching contexts have illustrated its potential power, little attention has been given to how teachers learn to use the tool or reimagine their pedagogical roles as they use backchanneling for instructional purposes. \n \nDesign/Methodology/Approach – Discourse analyses of 16 face-to-face (frontchannel) and online (backchannel) transcripts of discussions exposed how participants used these two venues to interact simultaneously around a literary text. Methods from Nystrand’s (2002) dialogic discourse analysis isolated each teacher interjection in the contexts of each discussion. \n \nFindings – The teacher used the backchannel to probe for elaborated student responses and model dialogic discourse moves. The teacher’s behind-the-scenes support limited his participation during frontchannel discussions, allowing for open discussion among students without the teacher’s consistent interjection, which disrupted the initiation-response-evaluation discourse structure that is pervasive in US schools. \n \nPractical Implications – Although backchanneling technology can be used to archive records of students’ participation that could be useful for assessment purposes, the teacher’s skillful capacity to negotiate two discussions at once reconstituted his role during the discussion from facilitator to a fellow reader with his students as they explored meaningful questions that literature provokes – a less obvious and potentially more powerful affordance of this digital tool for instructional purposes.","PeriodicalId":309500,"journal":{"name":"Best Practices in Teaching Digital Literacies","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practices in Teaching Digital Literacies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820180000009006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this study was to understand how, if at all, backchanneling technology supported an early career English teacher’s facilitation of literary discussions in his 10th grade classroom. Although emerging findings from studies of backchanneling in teaching contexts have illustrated its potential power, little attention has been given to how teachers learn to use the tool or reimagine their pedagogical roles as they use backchanneling for instructional purposes. Design/Methodology/Approach – Discourse analyses of 16 face-to-face (frontchannel) and online (backchannel) transcripts of discussions exposed how participants used these two venues to interact simultaneously around a literary text. Methods from Nystrand’s (2002) dialogic discourse analysis isolated each teacher interjection in the contexts of each discussion. Findings – The teacher used the backchannel to probe for elaborated student responses and model dialogic discourse moves. The teacher’s behind-the-scenes support limited his participation during frontchannel discussions, allowing for open discussion among students without the teacher’s consistent interjection, which disrupted the initiation-response-evaluation discourse structure that is pervasive in US schools. Practical Implications – Although backchanneling technology can be used to archive records of students’ participation that could be useful for assessment purposes, the teacher’s skillful capacity to negotiate two discussions at once reconstituted his role during the discussion from facilitator to a fellow reader with his students as they explored meaningful questions that literature provokes – a less obvious and potentially more powerful affordance of this digital tool for instructional purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用反向通道技术促进文学对话讨论
摘要目的-本研究的目的是了解反向通道技术如何支持一位早期职业英语教师在他的十年级课堂上促进文学讨论。尽管在教学环境中对反向通道的研究的新发现已经说明了它的潜在力量,但很少有人关注教师在使用反向通道进行教学目的时如何学习使用该工具或重新设想他们的教学角色。设计/方法论/方法-对16个面对面(前渠道)和在线(后渠道)讨论文本的话语分析揭示了参与者如何使用这两个场所同时围绕文学文本进行互动。Nystrand(2002)的对话话语分析方法将每个教师的感叹词在每个讨论的语境中分离出来。发现-教师使用反向通道探索学生的详细反应和示范对话话语动作。教师的幕后支持限制了他参与正面渠道的讨论,允许学生之间的公开讨论,而不需要教师一贯的插话,这破坏了在美国学校普遍存在的发起-反应-评价话语结构。实际意义-虽然反向通道技术可用于存档学生参与的记录,这可能对评估有用,在讨论过程中,当学生探索文学引发的有意义的问题时,教师能够同时协调两种讨论的熟练能力重新塑造了他的角色,从促进者转变为读者——这是一种不太明显但潜在更强大的教学目的的数字工具的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Beginning, Acting, Telling (Bat) Model: A Visual Framework for Teaching Digital Literacy through Inquiry and Information Seeking Language Today: Promoting Ela Content Area Learning through Collaboratively Engaged Social Media Practice Only One iPad: Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Teach Digital Literacies in Under-resourced Elementary Schools Tactile Picture Book Making and Multimodal Composition: Students Design for Equity in English Language Arts Pre-service Teachers’ Use of Multimodal Text Sets and Technology in Teaching Reading: Lessons Learned from a Design-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1