DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO THE CONTENT AND VOLUME OF FORENSIC MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IN COMPETENCES OF DIFFERENT SUBJECTS OF LEGAL PROCEEDING

Inessa Panchenko, I. Perepechina
{"title":"DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO THE CONTENT AND VOLUME OF FORENSIC MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IN COMPETENCES OF DIFFERENT SUBJECTS OF LEGAL PROCEEDING","authors":"Inessa Panchenko, I. Perepechina","doi":"10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-5-362-369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the article: to conduct a legal analysis of a differentiated approach to the content and volume of special forensic medical knowledge in the competence of various subjects of legal proceedings for their effective implementation of the norms of criminal procedure and other legislation, as well as of the educational context, within which preparation for professional activities requiring a certain the scope of the relevant competencies is conducted. Conclusions. The article deals with the requirements for the competence in the field of forensic medicine of various subjects of legal proceedings. Expert consciousness (as an integral system of expert thinking, expert knowledge, expert intuition, etc.) is attributed to the special competence of medical persons professionally knowledgeable in the field of forensic medicine. The lawyers participating in the proceedings are assigned an integrating and coordinating role, which requires general competence in forensic medicine, in particular, awareness of the modern possibilities of forensic medical examination and other forms of procedural and non-procedural application of forensic medical knowledge. The specified differentiated approach to the scope of competences of various subjects of the legal process does not imply any consolidation, interchangeability, but directly stipulates the need for goal-setting cooperation within the framework of a strict separation of the procedural roles assigned to these subjects, the integrity of the system of expert consciousness with the separation from it of the minimum necessary elements of forensic medicine knowledge sufficient to implement the procedural role of the investigator and other procedural ones. The consequences of the gaps are predictably negative in the education of lawyers, in particular, investigators, prosecutors, advocates and judges, caused by the absence of the discipline “Forensic medicine” in the basic (compulsory) part of the federal state standard of higher professional education in the field of “Jurisprudence”. The formation of an effective model of cooperation seems to be of current interest between subjects of legal proceedings with considering the establishment of differentiated requirements for the volume and content of forensic medical competencies. The complex structure of forensic competences, qualification requirements for forensic medical experts, the peculiarities of the education of medical specialists - should be taken into account by the subjects of the investigation, the court when involving forensic experts and other doctors to participate in the proceedings. It is necessary to change the wording of Art. 178 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: «with the participation of a forensic medical expert, and if one’s participation is impossible, - for a doctor» to the wording: «with the participation of a forensic medical expert, and if his participation is impossible, - for another doctor».","PeriodicalId":446864,"journal":{"name":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-5-362-369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the article: to conduct a legal analysis of a differentiated approach to the content and volume of special forensic medical knowledge in the competence of various subjects of legal proceedings for their effective implementation of the norms of criminal procedure and other legislation, as well as of the educational context, within which preparation for professional activities requiring a certain the scope of the relevant competencies is conducted. Conclusions. The article deals with the requirements for the competence in the field of forensic medicine of various subjects of legal proceedings. Expert consciousness (as an integral system of expert thinking, expert knowledge, expert intuition, etc.) is attributed to the special competence of medical persons professionally knowledgeable in the field of forensic medicine. The lawyers participating in the proceedings are assigned an integrating and coordinating role, which requires general competence in forensic medicine, in particular, awareness of the modern possibilities of forensic medical examination and other forms of procedural and non-procedural application of forensic medical knowledge. The specified differentiated approach to the scope of competences of various subjects of the legal process does not imply any consolidation, interchangeability, but directly stipulates the need for goal-setting cooperation within the framework of a strict separation of the procedural roles assigned to these subjects, the integrity of the system of expert consciousness with the separation from it of the minimum necessary elements of forensic medicine knowledge sufficient to implement the procedural role of the investigator and other procedural ones. The consequences of the gaps are predictably negative in the education of lawyers, in particular, investigators, prosecutors, advocates and judges, caused by the absence of the discipline “Forensic medicine” in the basic (compulsory) part of the federal state standard of higher professional education in the field of “Jurisprudence”. The formation of an effective model of cooperation seems to be of current interest between subjects of legal proceedings with considering the establishment of differentiated requirements for the volume and content of forensic medical competencies. The complex structure of forensic competences, qualification requirements for forensic medical experts, the peculiarities of the education of medical specialists - should be taken into account by the subjects of the investigation, the court when involving forensic experts and other doctors to participate in the proceedings. It is necessary to change the wording of Art. 178 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: «with the participation of a forensic medical expert, and if one’s participation is impossible, - for a doctor» to the wording: «with the participation of a forensic medical expert, and if his participation is impossible, - for another doctor».
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不同诉讼主体能力中法医学知识的内容和数量的差异化处理
该条的目的是:对不同法律诉讼主体的能力范围内的特殊法医知识的内容和数量的不同方法进行法律分析,以便有效执行刑事诉讼程序规范和其他立法,以及对教育背景进行法律分析,在这种背景下,为需要一定范围的相关能力的专业活动做准备。结论。本文论述了各种诉讼主体在法医学领域的权限要求。专家意识(作为专家思维、专家知识、专家直觉等的整体系统)是指在法医学领域具有专业知识的医务人员所具有的特殊能力。参与诉讼的律师被赋予整合和协调的作用,这需要具备法医方面的一般能力,特别是了解法医检查的现代可能性以及法医知识的其他程序和非程序应用形式。对法律程序各主体权限范围的具体区分办法并不意味着任何合并和互换性,而是直接规定需要在严格分离分配给这些主体的程序作用的框架内进行目标确定合作。专家意识体系的完整性与法医学知识的最低必要要素的分离,足以实现调查员和其他程序人员的程序作用。可以预见,这种差距对律师,特别是调查员、检察官、辩护律师和法官的教育造成的后果是消极的,因为在“法学”领域的联邦州高等专业教育标准的基本(必修)部分中没有“法医学”这门学科。在考虑对法医能力的数量和内容制定不同要求的情况下,形成有效的合作模式似乎是法律诉讼主体之间当前关心的问题。调查对象、法院在让法医专家和其他医生参与诉讼时,应考虑到法医能力的复杂结构、法医专家的资格要求、医学专家教育的特殊性。有必要将《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第178条的措辞:“在法医专家的参与下,如果一个人不可能参与,-请医生”改为“在法医专家的参与下,如果他不可能参与,-请另一名医生”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN MODERN REALITIES: PUBLIC-LEGAL AND PRIVATE LEGAL ASPECTS SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE CREATION OF A DATA MATRIX AS A PRIORITY INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE «SINGLE WINDOW» MECHANISM IN THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION CTP INSURANCE IN THE LEGAL ASPECT: NEW APPROACHES AND PROSPECTS CATEGORIES OF «SUFFICIENCY» AND «MERIT» WHEN DECIDING ON THE RELEASE OF A PERSON FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY ON EVALUATIVE GROUNDS PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN OF MOBILIZED CITIZENS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1