You can't ask if you don't know what to ask: a survey of the information needs and resources of hospital outpatients.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 1992-05-27
J Harris
{"title":"You can't ask if you don't know what to ask: a survey of the information needs and resources of hospital outpatients.","authors":"J Harris","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to test public demand for health and sickness information and identify sources of information used by the public.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>using a questionnaire as the basis of a highly structured interview, 274 outpatients or their caregivers from nine clinics in Wellington Hospital, attending for the second or subsequent time, were asked whether they felt they knew enough about their illness and treatment, and where they had obtained their information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>almost half expressed a wish for more illness information and two-fifths wanted to know more about their treatment. Respondents were significantly more satisfied with treatment than illness information. Outpatient comments further indicated dissatisfaction with information. Sixteen sources of information were each used by four or more people, almost 20% of the sample using more than six sources. Health professionals, the hospital doctor in particular, were the most important source of information; informal personal contacts were also widely used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the results highlight the difficulties of communication between health professionals and clients. The possibility of cooperation between health and information professionals in providing patients with more information is raised.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"105 934","pages":"199-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"1992-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: to test public demand for health and sickness information and identify sources of information used by the public.

Methods: using a questionnaire as the basis of a highly structured interview, 274 outpatients or their caregivers from nine clinics in Wellington Hospital, attending for the second or subsequent time, were asked whether they felt they knew enough about their illness and treatment, and where they had obtained their information.

Results: almost half expressed a wish for more illness information and two-fifths wanted to know more about their treatment. Respondents were significantly more satisfied with treatment than illness information. Outpatient comments further indicated dissatisfaction with information. Sixteen sources of information were each used by four or more people, almost 20% of the sample using more than six sources. Health professionals, the hospital doctor in particular, were the most important source of information; informal personal contacts were also widely used.

Conclusions: the results highlight the difficulties of communication between health professionals and clients. The possibility of cooperation between health and information professionals in providing patients with more information is raised.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果你不知道该问什么,你就不能问:一项关于医院门诊病人信息需求和资源的调查。
目标:测试公众对健康和疾病信息的需求,确定公众使用的信息来源。方法:采用问卷作为高度结构化访谈的基础,对惠灵顿医院9个诊所第二次或以后就诊的274名门诊病人或其护理人员进行了调查,询问他们是否认为自己对自己的疾病和治疗了解得足够多,以及他们从哪里获得这些信息。结果:几乎一半的人表示希望获得更多的疾病信息,五分之二的人希望了解更多关于他们的治疗。受访者对治疗的满意度明显高于对疾病信息的满意度。门诊病人的评论进一步表明了对信息的不满。16个信息源分别被4人或4人以上使用,近20%的样本使用了6个以上的信息源。保健专业人员,特别是医院医生,是最重要的信息来源;非正式的个人接触也被广泛使用。结论:结果突出了卫生专业人员与客户之间沟通的困难。提出了保健和信息专业人员在向患者提供更多信息方面进行合作的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Diffuse astrocytoma presenting with parkinsonism and gliomatosis-like infiltration. An approach to make general practitioner referrals suitable for artificial intelligence deployment. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women in Aotearoa New Zealand. Reform, repeal, replace: a case study of policy whiplash in New Zealand's health sector. Predictors of early-onset cancer risk: insights from machine learning analyses of the Christchurch Health and Development Study data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1