Aim: This study examines whether ethnicity is an independent marker of health or if ethnic disparities are fully explained by age, sex, rurality, socio-economic position and morbidity.
Method: Using the Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa Integrated Data Infrastructure, we identified the resident population of Aotearoa New Zealand each year from 2009 to 2018, establishing 10 cohorts that were followed up with at 12 months for amenable mortality, i.e., deaths from conditions responsive to healthcare in under-75-year-olds. Age, sex, ethnicity, rurality, small area deprivation, personal income and morbidity of cohort members were described. Logistic regression analyses and likelihood ratio tests were used to assess the independent association of these variables with amenable mortality.
Results: Ethnicity, socio-economic position and morbidity, along with age, sex and rurality, made significant independent contributions to predicting amenable mortality. Ethnicity predicted amenable mortality after adjusting for other variables. Compared with Europeans, the odds of amenable mortality were 1.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-1.50) times greater in Māori and 1.18 (95% CI 1.14-1.23) times greater in Pacific and half as likely in Asian (0.54, 95% CI 0.52-0.57).
Conclusion: Māori and Pacific ethnicity, and also socio-economic position and morbidity, are independent markers of health need relevant to the distribution of health resources and targeting of health services.
目的:本研究探讨种族是否是健康的独立标志,或者种族差异是否完全由年龄、性别、农村、社会经济地位和发病率来解释。方法:利用新西兰统计局(Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa)综合数据基础设施,我们确定了2009年至2018年每年新西兰Aotearoa的常住人口,建立了10个队列,并在12个月时随访可调整死亡率,即75岁以下儿童因医疗保健相关疾病导致的死亡。描述了队列成员的年龄、性别、种族、农村、小地区贫困、个人收入和发病率。采用Logistic回归分析和似然比检验来评估这些变量与可适应死亡率之间的独立关联。结果:种族、社会经济地位和发病率,以及年龄、性别和农村地区,对预测可适应死亡率有重要的独立贡献。在调整了其他变量后,种族预测了可调节的死亡率。与欧洲人相比,Māori人群的可适应死亡率是欧洲人的1.46倍(95%可信区间[CI] 1.43-1.50),太平洋人群的可适应死亡率是欧洲人的1.18倍(95%可信区间[CI] 1.14-1.23),亚洲人群的可适应死亡率是欧洲人的一半(0.54,95% CI 0.52-0.57)。结论:Māori和太平洋族裔,以及社会经济地位和发病率,是与卫生资源分配和卫生服务目标相关的卫生需求的独立标志。
{"title":"Is ethnicity an independent predictor of health need? Linked cohort logistic regression analysis to predict amenable mortality.","authors":"Andrea Teng, Melissa McLeod, Sue Crengle","doi":"10.26635/6965.7002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines whether ethnicity is an independent marker of health or if ethnic disparities are fully explained by age, sex, rurality, socio-economic position and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using the Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa Integrated Data Infrastructure, we identified the resident population of Aotearoa New Zealand each year from 2009 to 2018, establishing 10 cohorts that were followed up with at 12 months for amenable mortality, i.e., deaths from conditions responsive to healthcare in under-75-year-olds. Age, sex, ethnicity, rurality, small area deprivation, personal income and morbidity of cohort members were described. Logistic regression analyses and likelihood ratio tests were used to assess the independent association of these variables with amenable mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ethnicity, socio-economic position and morbidity, along with age, sex and rurality, made significant independent contributions to predicting amenable mortality. Ethnicity predicted amenable mortality after adjusting for other variables. Compared with Europeans, the odds of amenable mortality were 1.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-1.50) times greater in Māori and 1.18 (95% CI 1.14-1.23) times greater in Pacific and half as likely in Asian (0.54, 95% CI 0.52-0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Māori and Pacific ethnicity, and also socio-economic position and morbidity, are independent markers of health need relevant to the distribution of health resources and targeting of health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Johns, Binura Lekamalage, Benjamin Cribb, Mark Omundsen
Aim: Anastomotic leak (AL) is associated with major post-operative morbidity and mortality. The circular stapler, widely utilised in colorectal anastomosis, has seen a technological change from manual firing stapler (MFS) to powered automated firing stapler (PAFS). PAFS may reduce user error and technique variation and may be associated with reduced AL rate. The primary aim of the study was to assess differences in AL rate between MFS and PAFS. Secondary aims were to assess differences in length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality.
Methods: This was a retrospective, single surgeon review of patients undergoing resection with anastomosis using a circular stapler between 2016 and 2023. A historical MFS group (n=105) and a study PAFS group (n=112) were identified. Demographics, comorbidity, operation type, neoadjuvant therapy, AL, LOS and 30-day mortality were recorded.
Results: The populations were comparable, with no significant difference in demographics, BMI, ASA grade, neoadjuvant radiotherapy use or type of operation. The PAFS group contained more non-malignant cases, 35% vs 18% (p=0.01). AL rate was 11.4% in the MFS group and 3.6% in the PAFS group (p=0.04). Fifty-eight percent of the anastomotic leaks in the MFS group needed surgery, compared to zero from the PAFS group (p=0.09). Mean LOS was 10 days in the MFS group and 6 days in the PAFS group (p = 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was 0.9% from the MFS group and zero from the PAFS group (p=0.48).
Conclusion: While acknowledging confounders may have affected outcomes, in this study PAFS was safe and associated with a significant reduction in AL and LOS.
目的:吻合口漏(AL)是术后发病率和死亡率的重要因素。圆形吻合器在结直肠吻合术中得到了广泛的应用,经历了从手动点火吻合器(MFS)到动力自动点火吻合器(PAFS)的技术变革。PAFS可以减少用户错误和技术变化,并可能与降低AL率有关。本研究的主要目的是评估MFS和PAFS之间AL率的差异。次要目的是评估住院时间(LOS)和30天死亡率的差异。方法:回顾性分析2016年至2023年间单个外科医生使用圆形吻合器进行手术切除吻合的患者。确定了历史MFS组(n=105)和研究PAFS组(n=112)。记录人口统计学、合并症、手术类型、新辅助治疗、AL、LOS和30天死亡率。结果:人群具有可比性,在人口统计学、BMI、ASA分级、新辅助放疗使用或手术类型方面无显著差异。PAFS组非恶性病例较多,35% vs 18% (p=0.01)。MFS组AL为11.4%,PAFS组AL为3.6% (p=0.04)。MFS组58%的吻合口瘘需要手术,而PAFS组为零(p=0.09)。MFS组平均生存时间为10天,PAFS组平均生存时间为6天(p = 0.01)。MFS组30天死亡率为0.9%,PAFS组为零(p=0.48)。结论:虽然承认混杂因素可能会影响结果,但在本研究中,PAFS是安全的,并与AL和LOS的显著降低相关。
{"title":"Anastomotic leak rates between powered and non-powered circular staplers in left-sided colorectal resection; a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jonathan Johns, Binura Lekamalage, Benjamin Cribb, Mark Omundsen","doi":"10.26635/6965.7082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Anastomotic leak (AL) is associated with major post-operative morbidity and mortality. The circular stapler, widely utilised in colorectal anastomosis, has seen a technological change from manual firing stapler (MFS) to powered automated firing stapler (PAFS). PAFS may reduce user error and technique variation and may be associated with reduced AL rate. The primary aim of the study was to assess differences in AL rate between MFS and PAFS. Secondary aims were to assess differences in length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single surgeon review of patients undergoing resection with anastomosis using a circular stapler between 2016 and 2023. A historical MFS group (n=105) and a study PAFS group (n=112) were identified. Demographics, comorbidity, operation type, neoadjuvant therapy, AL, LOS and 30-day mortality were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The populations were comparable, with no significant difference in demographics, BMI, ASA grade, neoadjuvant radiotherapy use or type of operation. The PAFS group contained more non-malignant cases, 35% vs 18% (p=0.01). AL rate was 11.4% in the MFS group and 3.6% in the PAFS group (p=0.04). Fifty-eight percent of the anastomotic leaks in the MFS group needed surgery, compared to zero from the PAFS group (p=0.09). Mean LOS was 10 days in the MFS group and 6 days in the PAFS group (p = 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was 0.9% from the MFS group and zero from the PAFS group (p=0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While acknowledging confounders may have affected outcomes, in this study PAFS was safe and associated with a significant reduction in AL and LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Selwyn Te Paa, Tanira Kingi, Joanna Nee Nee, Allie Eathorne, Trisha Falleni, Jackson Smeed-Tauroa, Bianca Crichton, Melemafi Porter, Gabby Shortt, Jordan Tewhaiti-Smith, Richard Beasley, Alex Semprini
Aim: Diverse ethnic representation in clinical trials is critical to ensuring research priorities align with patient need and uphold commitments to health equity. In Aotearoa New Zealand, this is crucial given the persistent health inequities faced by Māori despite obligations of the government to Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi. We report the findings of a systematic review of ethnic representation, with a focus on Māori and Pacific peoples, in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) undertaken in New Zealand between 2010 and 2020.
Methods: A search was undertaken for RCTs undertaken in New Zealand between 2010 and 2020, registered in the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethnicity data were categorised to Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa (Stats NZ) level one or two codes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed. The primary outcome was the proportion of each Stats NZ level one ethnicity code, for all participants recruited to RCTs conducted in New Zealand which reported ethnicity.
Results: One thousand and forty trials were identified, 342 met the inclusion criteria, of which 103 reported no ethnicity data. For 295,254 participants across all 239 included studies, 6.1% of participants were European, 2.9% Māori, 1.4% Pacific peoples, 7.5% Asian, 2.5% Middle Eastern/Latin American/African (MELAA) and 9.0% Other ethnicity, with 70.6% Residual (unable to be categorised).
Conclusion: Ethnicity reporting in New Zealand-based clinical trials is inadequate and not standardised. Mandatory ethnicity reporting per Stats NZ codes to the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committees, ANZCTR and peer-reviewed journals, should be considered mandatory for RCTs undertaken in New Zealand.
{"title":"A systematic review of ethnic diversity in clinical trial participation in Aotearoa.","authors":"Selwyn Te Paa, Tanira Kingi, Joanna Nee Nee, Allie Eathorne, Trisha Falleni, Jackson Smeed-Tauroa, Bianca Crichton, Melemafi Porter, Gabby Shortt, Jordan Tewhaiti-Smith, Richard Beasley, Alex Semprini","doi":"10.26635/6965.6988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6988","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Diverse ethnic representation in clinical trials is critical to ensuring research priorities align with patient need and uphold commitments to health equity. In Aotearoa New Zealand, this is crucial given the persistent health inequities faced by Māori despite obligations of the government to Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi. We report the findings of a systematic review of ethnic representation, with a focus on Māori and Pacific peoples, in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) undertaken in New Zealand between 2010 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was undertaken for RCTs undertaken in New Zealand between 2010 and 2020, registered in the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethnicity data were categorised to Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa (Stats NZ) level one or two codes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed. The primary outcome was the proportion of each Stats NZ level one ethnicity code, for all participants recruited to RCTs conducted in New Zealand which reported ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and forty trials were identified, 342 met the inclusion criteria, of which 103 reported no ethnicity data. For 295,254 participants across all 239 included studies, 6.1% of participants were European, 2.9% Māori, 1.4% Pacific peoples, 7.5% Asian, 2.5% Middle Eastern/Latin American/African (MELAA) and 9.0% Other ethnicity, with 70.6% Residual (unable to be categorised).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ethnicity reporting in New Zealand-based clinical trials is inadequate and not standardised. Mandatory ethnicity reporting per Stats NZ codes to the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committees, ANZCTR and peer-reviewed journals, should be considered mandatory for RCTs undertaken in New Zealand.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Dysphagia frequently occurs in movement disorders, leading to malnutrition and aspiration. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides nutrition directly into the stomach, bypassing the dysfunctional swallow. However, PEG insertion is a complex decision, both clinically and ethically. Although PEG outcomes are reported in other neurological disorders, there is limited research in atypical parkinsonian syndromes such as multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Insertion rates remain variable, reflecting a paucity of research and lack of consistent guidelines. Basic mortality and morbidity data would help inform practice. To our knowledge, this is the first international study of PEG insertion and its impact on survival and aspiration pneumonia in atypical parkinsonian syndromes.
Method: This was an international retrospective study of 72 patients with MSA, PSP or CBD. Survival was recorded from reported onset of dysphagia to death. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission rate for aspiration pneumonia.
Results: Median survival was 17.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.0-24.9) in non-PEG patients versus 48.8 months (95% CI 44.8 to not reached) in PEG patients, hazard ratio (HR) 0.38 (95% CI 0.18-0.81; p=0.013). PEG was not associated with reduced risk of aspiration pneumonia; 0.76 versus 0.68 admissions per patient-year, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.41 (95% CI 0.74-2.68; p=0.297).
Conclusion: PEG insertion may improve survival in atypical parkinsonian syndromes, though we found no evidence of reduced aspiration risk. Given the rarity of these conditions, international registries may help to determine the safety and efficacy of PEG use.
吞咽困难常发生在运动障碍中,导致营养不良和误吸。经皮内窥镜胃造口术(PEG)直接向胃提供营养,绕过功能失调的吞咽。然而,无论是临床还是伦理,PEG的植入都是一个复杂的决定。尽管PEG在其他神经系统疾病中也有报道,但对非典型帕金森综合征(如多系统萎缩(MSA)、进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)和皮质基底变性(CBD))的研究有限。插入率仍然是可变的,这反映了研究的缺乏和缺乏一致的指导方针。基本的死亡率和发病率数据将有助于为实践提供信息。据我们所知,这是第一个关于PEG植入及其对非典型帕金森综合征患者生存和吸入性肺炎影响的国际研究。方法:对72例MSA、PSP或CBD患者进行国际回顾性研究。从报告的吞咽困难发病到死亡记录生存。次要结局包括吸入性肺炎的住院率。结果:非PEG患者的中位生存期为17.4个月(95%可信区间[CI] 14.0 ~ 24.9), PEG患者的中位生存期为48.8个月(95% CI 44.8 ~未达到),风险比(HR) 0.38 (95% CI 0.18 ~ 0.81; p=0.013)。PEG与吸入性肺炎风险降低无关;每患者年入院率0.76 vs 0.68,发病率比(IRR) 1.41 (95% CI 0.74-2.68; p=0.297)。结论:PEG植入可提高非典型帕金森综合征患者的生存率,尽管我们没有发现降低误吸风险的证据。鉴于这些情况的罕见性,国际注册可能有助于确定PEG使用的安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in atypical parkinsonian syndromes: survival and aspiration outcomes from a retrospective international cohort.","authors":"Tim Ruttle, Edward Jones, Cindy Towns","doi":"10.26635/6965.7117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dysphagia frequently occurs in movement disorders, leading to malnutrition and aspiration. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides nutrition directly into the stomach, bypassing the dysfunctional swallow. However, PEG insertion is a complex decision, both clinically and ethically. Although PEG outcomes are reported in other neurological disorders, there is limited research in atypical parkinsonian syndromes such as multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Insertion rates remain variable, reflecting a paucity of research and lack of consistent guidelines. Basic mortality and morbidity data would help inform practice. To our knowledge, this is the first international study of PEG insertion and its impact on survival and aspiration pneumonia in atypical parkinsonian syndromes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was an international retrospective study of 72 patients with MSA, PSP or CBD. Survival was recorded from reported onset of dysphagia to death. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission rate for aspiration pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median survival was 17.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.0-24.9) in non-PEG patients versus 48.8 months (95% CI 44.8 to not reached) in PEG patients, hazard ratio (HR) 0.38 (95% CI 0.18-0.81; p=0.013). PEG was not associated with reduced risk of aspiration pneumonia; 0.76 versus 0.68 admissions per patient-year, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.41 (95% CI 0.74-2.68; p=0.297).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEG insertion may improve survival in atypical parkinsonian syndromes, though we found no evidence of reduced aspiration risk. Given the rarity of these conditions, international registries may help to determine the safety and efficacy of PEG use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"40-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Matheson, Johanna Reidy, Lis Ellison-Loschmann
Community-led action is essential for building a more effective and equitable health system. Yet Aotearoa New Zealand's history of top-down structural reforms has undermined progress toward "healthy futures for all". We draw on complexity science and system-change principles to explain why genuine devolution and community engagement are not just ideological preferences but practical necessities in a complex health system. Community agency and locally tailored innovation can drive emergent, system-wide improvements, but only if central structures enable and sustain these relationships. A key step is reframing our mental model of the health system from a linear machine to a complex adaptive system. We discuss how the turbulence of current policy changes fits into long-running patterns and why a clearer conceptualisation of complexity can guide policymakers toward tangible actions that reorient the system towards patients and communities. Finally, we outline some essential ingredients for how New Zealand can transition from rhetoric and good intentions to the effective implementation of an equitable, community-centred health system.
社区主导的行动对于建立更有效和公平的卫生系统至关重要。然而,Aotearoa New 新西兰自上而下的结构改革历史阻碍了“人人享有健康未来”的进程。我们利用复杂性科学和系统变化原则来解释为什么真正的权力下放和社区参与不仅是意识形态上的偏好,而且是复杂卫生系统中实际的必需品。社区机构和地方量身定制的创新可以推动紧急的、全系统的改进,但前提是中央结构能够支持和维持这些关系。关键的一步是将我们对卫生系统的心理模型从线性机器重新构建为复杂的自适应系统。我们讨论了当前政策变化的动荡如何适应长期模式,以及为什么对复杂性进行更清晰的概念化可以指导政策制定者采取切实行动,将系统重新定位于患者和社区。最后,我们概述了新西兰如何从花言巧语和良好意愿过渡到有效实施公平、以社区为中心的卫生系统的一些基本要素。
{"title":"Putting communities at the centre for a more effective and equitable health system in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Anna Matheson, Johanna Reidy, Lis Ellison-Loschmann","doi":"10.26635/6965.7118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-led action is essential for building a more effective and equitable health system. Yet Aotearoa New Zealand's history of top-down structural reforms has undermined progress toward \"healthy futures for all\". We draw on complexity science and system-change principles to explain why genuine devolution and community engagement are not just ideological preferences but practical necessities in a complex health system. Community agency and locally tailored innovation can drive emergent, system-wide improvements, but only if central structures enable and sustain these relationships. A key step is reframing our mental model of the health system from a linear machine to a complex adaptive system. We discuss how the turbulence of current policy changes fits into long-running patterns and why a clearer conceptualisation of complexity can guide policymakers toward tangible actions that reorient the system towards patients and communities. Finally, we outline some essential ingredients for how New Zealand can transition from rhetoric and good intentions to the effective implementation of an equitable, community-centred health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madelyne Jouart, Elizabeth Conner, Jason Rodier, Graham Wilson
Aim: While less common than adult blindness, childhood blindness has a significant burden in terms of the total number of "blind years". We aim to determine if there is scope for improved strategies in the prevention of childhood blindness in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Method: We conducted a review of New Zealand childhood blindness data.
Results: In New Zealand, there is a paucity of data on childhood blindness. However, significant scope remains for prevention through optimising maternal health, neonatal care, increasing uptake of immunisations and attendance at vision screening programmes, as well as the earliest possible detection of myopia and keratoconus.
Conclusion: Ophthalmologists and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists must continue to actively collaborate with obstetricians, paediatricians, general practitioners, optometrists, national screening units, vaccination programmes, epidemiologists and Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora to promote primary prevention strategies and improve visual outcomes for our tamariki.
{"title":"Childhood blindness prevention in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Madelyne Jouart, Elizabeth Conner, Jason Rodier, Graham Wilson","doi":"10.26635/6965.6974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>While less common than adult blindness, childhood blindness has a significant burden in terms of the total number of \"blind years\". We aim to determine if there is scope for improved strategies in the prevention of childhood blindness in Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a review of New Zealand childhood blindness data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In New Zealand, there is a paucity of data on childhood blindness. However, significant scope remains for prevention through optimising maternal health, neonatal care, increasing uptake of immunisations and attendance at vision screening programmes, as well as the earliest possible detection of myopia and keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ophthalmologists and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists must continue to actively collaborate with obstetricians, paediatricians, general practitioners, optometrists, national screening units, vaccination programmes, epidemiologists and Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora to promote primary prevention strategies and improve visual outcomes for our tamariki.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rebuilding confidence in New Zealand's health system.","authors":"Frank Frizelle","doi":"10.26635/6965.e1628","DOIUrl":"10.26635/6965.e1628","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Natalie Gauld, James Cleland, Sarah Buchanan, Joanna Hikaka, Chris Frampton, Stephen Buetow
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the most common form of motor neurone disease (MND), is a neurodegenerative condition with typically short life expectancy. Riluzole, the only survival prolonging medication funded in Aotearoa New Zealand, has high uptake in other developed countries.
Aims: To quantify riluzole use in New Zealand, identify factors associated with its use and explore reasons for non-use.
Methods: In 2025, people in New Zealand diagnosed with MND were invited to self-complete questionnaires. Data were collected via Qualtrics, exported to Excel and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Respondents with progressive muscular atrophy or primary lateral sclerosis diagnoses were excluded from this analysis.
Results: Of 115 respondents, 55 (48%) were currently taking riluzole, 14 (12%) had taken it previously and 42 (36%) had never taken it. Common reasons for non-use included riluzole not being offered and concerns about lack of effectiveness and/or side effects. Uptake was lower with bulbar onset than limb onset (p<0.05).
Conclusions: People with ALS in New Zealand have low uptake of riluzole, despite its survival benefits. Prescribers and people with ALS need up-to-date information about riluzole's benefit-risk profile to increase uptake and confidence in prescription and use. Liquid riluzole is needed in New Zealand to aid uptake.
{"title":"Riluzole use and reasons for non-use in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Natalie Gauld, James Cleland, Sarah Buchanan, Joanna Hikaka, Chris Frampton, Stephen Buetow","doi":"10.26635/6965.7238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the most common form of motor neurone disease (MND), is a neurodegenerative condition with typically short life expectancy. Riluzole, the only survival prolonging medication funded in Aotearoa New Zealand, has high uptake in other developed countries.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify riluzole use in New Zealand, identify factors associated with its use and explore reasons for non-use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2025, people in New Zealand diagnosed with MND were invited to self-complete questionnaires. Data were collected via Qualtrics, exported to Excel and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Respondents with progressive muscular atrophy or primary lateral sclerosis diagnoses were excluded from this analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 115 respondents, 55 (48%) were currently taking riluzole, 14 (12%) had taken it previously and 42 (36%) had never taken it. Common reasons for non-use included riluzole not being offered and concerns about lack of effectiveness and/or side effects. Uptake was lower with bulbar onset than limb onset (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with ALS in New Zealand have low uptake of riluzole, despite its survival benefits. Prescribers and people with ALS need up-to-date information about riluzole's benefit-risk profile to increase uptake and confidence in prescription and use. Liquid riluzole is needed in New Zealand to aid uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1628","pages":"50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}