Key indicators for maintenance performance measurement: The aircraft galley and associated equipment manufacturer case study

R. Chompu-inwai, Rungthip Diaotrakun, T. Thaiupathump
{"title":"Key indicators for maintenance performance measurement: The aircraft galley and associated equipment manufacturer case study","authors":"R. Chompu-inwai, Rungthip Diaotrakun, T. Thaiupathump","doi":"10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to develop a maintenance performance measurement model, based on three main steps, these being: (1) identify and screen factors affecting maintenance performance, (2) identify relevant key indicators for the measurement of maintenance performance, and (3) apply those key indicators developed as part of a manufacturing company case study. Using three reference models - the Cost of Poor Maintenance Model, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and the Context-Input-Process-Product assessment model, the first step was to identify a number of factors relevant to maintenance performance, as taken from previous research. The resulting 105 factors were a mixture of quantitative and qualitative factors, and were categorized according to the four perspectives within the Balances Scorecard, these being learning and growth, internal process, customer, and finance. A questionnaire used to screen those factors affecting maintenance performance was then distributed to stakeholders and maintenance staff at the case study manufacturer, which produces aircraft galleys and associated equipment. An analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, and according to the study results, 20 factors were found to most affect maintenance performance. Once the factors had been identified, a second step was carried out - to identify the key maintenance performance measurement indicators, of which 6 were financial, 6 were customer related, 5 were related to the internal process and 3 indicators were linked to learning and growth. The final step was to employ the indicators obtained as part of a study of the case study manufacturer, in order to evaluate maintenance performance there. The results of the evaluation, once obtained, helped develop a framework that could be used to improve the maintenance system.","PeriodicalId":354195,"journal":{"name":"2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of this research was to develop a maintenance performance measurement model, based on three main steps, these being: (1) identify and screen factors affecting maintenance performance, (2) identify relevant key indicators for the measurement of maintenance performance, and (3) apply those key indicators developed as part of a manufacturing company case study. Using three reference models - the Cost of Poor Maintenance Model, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and the Context-Input-Process-Product assessment model, the first step was to identify a number of factors relevant to maintenance performance, as taken from previous research. The resulting 105 factors were a mixture of quantitative and qualitative factors, and were categorized according to the four perspectives within the Balances Scorecard, these being learning and growth, internal process, customer, and finance. A questionnaire used to screen those factors affecting maintenance performance was then distributed to stakeholders and maintenance staff at the case study manufacturer, which produces aircraft galleys and associated equipment. An analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, and according to the study results, 20 factors were found to most affect maintenance performance. Once the factors had been identified, a second step was carried out - to identify the key maintenance performance measurement indicators, of which 6 were financial, 6 were customer related, 5 were related to the internal process and 3 indicators were linked to learning and growth. The final step was to employ the indicators obtained as part of a study of the case study manufacturer, in order to evaluate maintenance performance there. The results of the evaluation, once obtained, helped develop a framework that could be used to improve the maintenance system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维修绩效衡量的关键指标:飞机厨房和相关设备制造商的案例研究
本研究的目的是建立一个维修绩效衡量模型,该模型基于三个主要步骤,即:(1)识别和筛选影响维修绩效的因素;(2)确定用于测量维修绩效的相关关键指标;(3)将这些关键指标作为制造公司案例研究的一部分加以应用。使用三个参考模型——不良维修成本模型、马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖和环境-投入-过程-产品评估模型,第一步是根据之前的研究确定与维修性能相关的一些因素。由此产生的105个因素是定量和定性因素的混合,并根据平衡计分卡中的四个观点进行分类,这些观点是学习和成长、内部流程、客户和财务。一份调查问卷用于筛选影响维修性能的因素,然后分发给案例研究制造商的利益相关者和维修人员,该制造商生产飞机厨房和相关设备。运用描述性统计进行分析,根据研究结果,发现20个因素对维修性能影响最大。一旦确定了这些因素,第二步就开始了——确定关键的维护绩效衡量指标,其中6个是财务指标,6个是与客户相关的指标,5个与内部流程相关的指标,3个与学习和成长相关的指标。最后一步是将获得的指标作为案例研究制造商研究的一部分,以评估那里的维护性能。评估的结果一旦获得,就有助于制定一个可用于改进维修系统的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measurements and evaluation of regional innovation capacity and spatial difference Pricing and channel choices for the competitive direct channel introduction Modeling multi-agent system dynamics: Graph semantic based approach Peer-review: Overconfidence bias in a conference setting Towards logistics service provider selection strategy using primitive cognitive network process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1