{"title":"PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION","authors":"Sitti Fatimah, Fitriani Nur, Suharti Suharti, Sri Sulasteri, Andi Dian Angriani","doi":"10.31941/DELTA.V9I2.1319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to determine whether there are differences in the understanding of the concept of students who learn by applying the model Problem Based Learning with Group Investigation. This research in to the type of quasi-experimental design of non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group. The samples taken were class XI IPA 2 (experimental class I) and class XI IPA 3 (experimental class II). The instrument applied was a learning outcome test containing 5 items. Data analysis was calculated using analysis techniques: descriptive and inferential. The results of the descriptive data obtained mean scores of 44.81 pretest and 76.54 posttest for the experimental class I, while the experimental class II scored 47.54 pretest and 84.14 posttest. From the independent sample test, it was obtained a sign score: 0.000 at a significance level of 5%. This means that H0 is rejected, so it was decided that the level of conceptual understanding for the model is Problem Based Learning different from the level of concept understanding in the model Group Investigation.","PeriodicalId":186823,"journal":{"name":"Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31941/DELTA.V9I2.1319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine whether there are differences in the understanding of the concept of students who learn by applying the model Problem Based Learning with Group Investigation. This research in to the type of quasi-experimental design of non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group. The samples taken were class XI IPA 2 (experimental class I) and class XI IPA 3 (experimental class II). The instrument applied was a learning outcome test containing 5 items. Data analysis was calculated using analysis techniques: descriptive and inferential. The results of the descriptive data obtained mean scores of 44.81 pretest and 76.54 posttest for the experimental class I, while the experimental class II scored 47.54 pretest and 84.14 posttest. From the independent sample test, it was obtained a sign score: 0.000 at a significance level of 5%. This means that H0 is rejected, so it was decided that the level of conceptual understanding for the model is Problem Based Learning different from the level of concept understanding in the model Group Investigation.
本研究的目的是确定应用问题基础学习与小组调查模式学习的学生对概念的理解是否存在差异。本研究采用非等效前测后测对照组的准实验设计。数据分析采用描述性和推断性分析技术进行计算。描述性数据结果显示,实验班的前测平均分为44.81分,后测平均分为76.54分,实验班的前测平均分为47.54分,后测平均分为84.14分。从独立样本检验中,在显著性水平为5%的情况下,得到符号分数:0.000。这意味着H0被拒绝,因此决定模型的概念理解层次是Problem Based Learning,不同于模型Group Investigation中的概念理解层次。