Legislazione elettorale e giurisprudenza costituzionale nei paesi di Visegrád. Un attivismo giudiziario limitato su un argomento vincolato da scelte costituenti

J. Sawicki
{"title":"Legislazione elettorale e giurisprudenza costituzionale nei paesi di Visegrád. Un attivismo giudiziario limitato su un argomento vincolato da scelte costituenti","authors":"J. Sawicki","doi":"10.54103/2612-6672/18119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poland and Hungary have played a pivotal role in the post-socialist democratic transformation, even in the field of elections and electoral legislation. The two countries differed from each other. Hungary opted for a mixed electoral system, in which the majoritarian component was dominant. Poland, instead, chose a proportional system. From a general standpoint, the judiciary system of the two countries – and, in particular, their constitutional courts – did not raise any particular objection to the basic guidelines of electoral legislation. The judicial intervention only took place occasionally, and more incisively in Hungary, when a significant departure from proclaimed principles occurred. This was particularly relevant with reference to the voting rights of citizens who live abroad.","PeriodicalId":275196,"journal":{"name":"Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società (NAD-DIS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società (NAD-DIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/18119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poland and Hungary have played a pivotal role in the post-socialist democratic transformation, even in the field of elections and electoral legislation. The two countries differed from each other. Hungary opted for a mixed electoral system, in which the majoritarian component was dominant. Poland, instead, chose a proportional system. From a general standpoint, the judiciary system of the two countries – and, in particular, their constitutional courts – did not raise any particular objection to the basic guidelines of electoral legislation. The judicial intervention only took place occasionally, and more incisively in Hungary, when a significant departure from proclaimed principles occurred. This was particularly relevant with reference to the voting rights of citizens who live abroad.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家宪法选举立法和判例法的Visegrád。在一个受宪法选择约束的问题上,司法行动主义有限
波兰和匈牙利在后社会主义民主转型中发挥了关键作用,甚至在选举和选举立法领域也是如此。这两个国家彼此不同。匈牙利选择了混合选举制度,多数派占主导地位。相反,波兰选择了比例制。从一般的观点来看,这两个国家的司法制度- -特别是它们的宪法法院- -并没有对选举立法的基本准则提出任何特别的反对意见。司法干预只是偶尔发生,在匈牙利,当明显背离所宣布的原则时,司法干预更为尖锐。这尤其与居住在国外的公民的投票权有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La Santa Sede e il ripudio della dottrina della scoperta tra riduzionismo e negazione di responsabilità Il trattamento dei dati biometrici nel quadro della strategia europea dei dati, fra rischi di mass surveillance e tutela dei diritti fondamentali Per un’analisi critica del tema della corruzione nella corrente dominante gli studi sullo sviluppo: percorsi teorici e riflessioni dai territori marginali dell’Odisha (India) Diritto al cibo e sovranità alimentare nella Repubblica federale democratica del Nepal Recensione. Patricia Chiantera-Stutte, Giovanni Borgognone (eds.), Civilization. Global Histories of a Political Idea, Lanham, Lexington Books, 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1