Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis

M. Muehlen, M. Indulska, Gerrit Kamp
{"title":"Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis","authors":"M. Muehlen, M. Indulska, Gerrit Kamp","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2007.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process modeling and rule modeling languages are both used to document organizational policies and procedures. However, little work has been done to understand their synergies and overlap. Understanding the relationship between the two modeling types would allow organizations to maximize synergies and reduce their modeling effort. In this paper we use the well-established Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation theory to compare the representation capabilities of both types of languages. We perform a representational analysis of two rule modeling languages, viz., SRML and SBVR. We compare their representation capabilities with those of four popular conceptual business process modeling languages, and focus on the aspects of maximum ontological completeness and minimum ontological overlap. The outcome of this study shows that no single language is internally complete with respect to the BWW representation model and that a combination of two languages, viz. SRML and BPMN, is better suited for process modeling than any single modeling language.","PeriodicalId":181454,"journal":{"name":"2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2007.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Process modeling and rule modeling languages are both used to document organizational policies and procedures. However, little work has been done to understand their synergies and overlap. Understanding the relationship between the two modeling types would allow organizations to maximize synergies and reduce their modeling effort. In this paper we use the well-established Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation theory to compare the representation capabilities of both types of languages. We perform a representational analysis of two rule modeling languages, viz., SRML and SBVR. We compare their representation capabilities with those of four popular conceptual business process modeling languages, and focus on the aspects of maximum ontological completeness and minimum ontological overlap. The outcome of this study shows that no single language is internally complete with respect to the BWW representation model and that a combination of two languages, viz. SRML and BPMN, is better suited for process modeling than any single modeling language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
业务流程和业务规则建模:具象分析
流程建模和规则建模语言都用于记录组织策略和过程。然而,了解它们的协同作用和重叠的工作却很少。了解两种建模类型之间的关系将允许组织最大化协同作用并减少建模工作。在本文中,我们使用公认的Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW)表征理论来比较两种语言的表征能力。我们对两种规则建模语言(即SRML和SBVR)进行了具象分析。我们将它们的表示能力与四种流行的概念性业务流程建模语言的表示能力进行比较,并将重点放在最大本体完整性和最小本体重叠方面。这项研究的结果表明,对于BWW表示模型来说,没有一种语言是内部完整的,两种语言的组合,即SRML和BPMN,比任何单一的建模语言都更适合于过程建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Requirements for ODP Enterprise Architecture Tools Introduction to the Proceedings of the EDOC 2007 Workshop Middleware for Web Services (MWS) 2007 Ontologies and Rules for Rapid Enterprise Integration and Event Aggregation Using the ODP reference model for Enterprise Architecture On the Foundation for Roles in RM-ODP: Contributions from Conceptual Modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1