THE ROLE OF TRUST AND WORK RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION ON PROJECT OUTCOMES

Sandra Barač Miftarević, Marko Paliaga
{"title":"THE ROLE OF TRUST AND WORK RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION ON PROJECT OUTCOMES","authors":"Sandra Barač Miftarević, Marko Paliaga","doi":"10.20867/tosee.06.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – In recent researches, the concept of trust in a project process appears to be the one of the most significant elements. A project process involves numerous actors with often clashing interests difficult to adjust during cooperation, but the leading aim is common to all - an accomplished project. This empirical research analyzes two dimensions of trust, according to Rousseau’s dimensions of trust (calculus-based and relational-based trust), in a relationship with the satisfaction with a work relationship in a project process and project outcomes, success or failure, to try to explore its mutual correlation and its predictors influence on project outputs. Methodology – A questionnaire was delivered through Survey Monkey platform on 750 e-mail addresses in Croatia with a response rate of 13.2% (99 respondents). A correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used to analyze collected data. Findings – The results of an analysis revealed that trust is an essential factor in the project process, which leads to the satisfaction of players with the working relationships in a project process, and to the project’s success or failure. Further the results revealed that trust is perceived as a base operator in a project process. Trust deficit can point to significant issues even before the dawn of project process, so it is a prerequisite to bring together all targets, and clashed interests. Contribution – A trust in a project process is a complex construct which demands further debate, and this analysis is an attempt to add further scientific insight about the relevance of trust in a relationship among the participants, and at the same time provides an application design with the opportunity to foresee a behavior of stakeholders engaged in a process. A wise leader will gather on all components in an equation, trying to identify the most effective approach to carry out and execute the project with success.","PeriodicalId":276966,"journal":{"name":"Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20867/tosee.06.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – In recent researches, the concept of trust in a project process appears to be the one of the most significant elements. A project process involves numerous actors with often clashing interests difficult to adjust during cooperation, but the leading aim is common to all - an accomplished project. This empirical research analyzes two dimensions of trust, according to Rousseau’s dimensions of trust (calculus-based and relational-based trust), in a relationship with the satisfaction with a work relationship in a project process and project outcomes, success or failure, to try to explore its mutual correlation and its predictors influence on project outputs. Methodology – A questionnaire was delivered through Survey Monkey platform on 750 e-mail addresses in Croatia with a response rate of 13.2% (99 respondents). A correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used to analyze collected data. Findings – The results of an analysis revealed that trust is an essential factor in the project process, which leads to the satisfaction of players with the working relationships in a project process, and to the project’s success or failure. Further the results revealed that trust is perceived as a base operator in a project process. Trust deficit can point to significant issues even before the dawn of project process, so it is a prerequisite to bring together all targets, and clashed interests. Contribution – A trust in a project process is a complex construct which demands further debate, and this analysis is an attempt to add further scientific insight about the relevance of trust in a relationship among the participants, and at the same time provides an application design with the opportunity to foresee a behavior of stakeholders engaged in a process. A wise leader will gather on all components in an equation, trying to identify the most effective approach to carry out and execute the project with success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任和工作关系满意度对项目成果的影响
在最近的研究中,信任的概念在项目过程中似乎是最重要的因素之一。项目过程涉及许多参与者,他们的利益经常相互冲突,难以在合作过程中进行调整,但主要目标是所有人共同的——完成项目。本实证研究根据卢梭的信任维度(基于计算的信任和基于关系的信任),分析了信任的两个维度,在项目过程中对工作关系的满意度和项目结果的成功或失败之间的关系,试图探索其相互相关性及其预测因子对项目产出的影响。方法-通过Survey Monkey平台向克罗地亚的750个电子邮件地址发送问卷,回复率为13.2%(99名受访者)。采用相关分析和多元线性回归对收集到的数据进行分析。调查结果-分析结果显示,信任是项目过程中的一个重要因素,它导致参与者对项目过程中的工作关系的满意度,以及项目的成功或失败。进一步的结果显示,信任被认为是一个基本运营商在一个项目的过程中。信任赤字甚至在项目进程开始之前就可以指出重大问题,因此将所有目标和利益冲突聚集在一起是先决条件。贡献——项目过程中的信任是一个复杂的结构,需要进一步的讨论,本分析试图进一步科学地了解参与者之间关系中信任的相关性,同时为应用程序设计提供了预见参与过程的利益相关者行为的机会。一个明智的领导者会收集等式中的所有组成部分,试图找出最有效的方法来成功地实施和执行项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMAGE FORMATION IN RURAL TOURISM DESTINATION USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) FOR TOURIST DESTINATION CHOICE: A CASE STUDY OF CROATIA INFORMATIVE, EDUCATIONAL, AND PROMOTIONAL ROLE OF GEOCACHING IN THE REGION TOP 30 SOFT SKILLS IN TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY GRADUATES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW DESIGN OF A WORKBENCH AND GUIDELINES TO IMPROVE THE EFFICACY OF ADVERTISING MESSAGES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1