OntoQAI: An Ontology to Support Quality Assurance Inspections

J. M. D. Silva, Pablo Dall'Oglio, S.C.C.S. Pinto, I. Bittencourt, S. Mergen
{"title":"OntoQAI: An Ontology to Support Quality Assurance Inspections","authors":"J. M. D. Silva, Pablo Dall'Oglio, S.C.C.S. Pinto, I. Bittencourt, S. Mergen","doi":"10.1109/SBES.2015.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), the purpose of Process and Product Quality Assurance (PPQA) is to provide staff and management with objective insights about processes and their associated work products. Such purpose is usually achieved through the implementation of software inspections. Although software inspection be a common practice, it is time-consuming and expensive, which turns the implementation in small and medium-sized teams infeasible. To improve the software inspection, this paper proposes a domain ontology for representing the concepts of quality assurance inspection, which is independent, extensive, shareable and semantically strong. Through the ontology it is possible to provide a formal structure to support the development of software engineering solutions with quality. To support the quality assurance inspections, we developed an agent-based prototype that encapsulates the ontology model. The prototype is able to generate inspection checklists and automatically allocate noncompliance issues. We validated the approach through a case study that shows an increase of inspection coverage and adherence of process.","PeriodicalId":329313,"journal":{"name":"2015 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2015.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

According to Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), the purpose of Process and Product Quality Assurance (PPQA) is to provide staff and management with objective insights about processes and their associated work products. Such purpose is usually achieved through the implementation of software inspections. Although software inspection be a common practice, it is time-consuming and expensive, which turns the implementation in small and medium-sized teams infeasible. To improve the software inspection, this paper proposes a domain ontology for representing the concepts of quality assurance inspection, which is independent, extensive, shareable and semantically strong. Through the ontology it is possible to provide a formal structure to support the development of software engineering solutions with quality. To support the quality assurance inspections, we developed an agent-based prototype that encapsulates the ontology model. The prototype is able to generate inspection checklists and automatically allocate noncompliance issues. We validated the approach through a case study that shows an increase of inspection coverage and adherence of process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OntoQAI:支持质量保证检查的本体
根据能力成熟度模型集成(CMMI),过程和产品质量保证(PPQA)的目的是为员工和管理层提供关于过程及其相关工作产品的客观见解。这样的目的通常是通过软件检查的实现来实现的。尽管软件检查是一种常见的实践,但它既耗时又昂贵,这使得在中小型团队中实现变得不可行。为了改进软件检测,本文提出了一个独立、广泛、可共享、语义强的领域本体来表示质量保证检测的概念。通过本体,可以提供一个正式的结构来支持高质量的软件工程解决方案的开发。为了支持质量保证检查,我们开发了一个封装本体模型的基于代理的原型。原型能够生成检查清单并自动分配不符合问题。我们通过一个案例研究验证了该方法,该案例研究显示了检查覆盖率和过程依从性的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian Network Model to Assess Agile Teams' Teamwork Quality Evaluating Collaborative Practices in Acquiring Programming Skills: Findings of a Controlled Experiment A Method to Derive Metric Thresholds for Software Product Lines An Experiment on Process Model Understandability Using Textual Work Instructions and BPMN Models Influence of the Review of Executed Activities Utilizing Planning Poker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1