Analysis of the Blocking Effect in Equivalence Classes Established by Match-to-Sample and Respondent-Type Training

Kristopher Clayton
{"title":"Analysis of the Blocking Effect in Equivalence Classes Established by Match-to-Sample and Respondent-Type Training","authors":"Kristopher Clayton","doi":"10.15344/2455-3867/2020/169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Objective: Blocking occurs when previous conditioning with one stimulus reduces, or blocks, conditioning to a second redundant stimulus added later in training or conditioning procedures. Previous research has suggested that blocking may occur during equivalence class formation. Although both match-to-sample and respondent-type training have been used to establish equivalence classes, blocking has only been studied using match to sample procedures. Previous research on blocking in equivalence class formation did not utilize control groups, limiting the conclusions drawn from those studies. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to compare match-to-sample and respondent-type training for their susceptibility to blocking in three-member equivalence classes using control conditions. Method: A total of 27 participants were exposed to match-to-sample or respondent-type training procedures to form equivalence classes using a linear series training structure. Within each training procedure, one group of participants was exposed to a blocking condition and one was not. Results: Results indicated that the blocking did not occur for the 4 of 6 participants who formed equivalence classes. Patterns of responding that would be expected if blocking occurred were seen in both experimental and control conditions. Conclusions: Results obtained in the current study indicate that some processes other than blocking are involved when stimuli fail to enter equivalence classes. Future research should examine other processes involved when stimuli fail to enter into equivalence classes after training.","PeriodicalId":270326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology & Behavior Analysis","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology & Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-3867/2020/169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background/Objective: Blocking occurs when previous conditioning with one stimulus reduces, or blocks, conditioning to a second redundant stimulus added later in training or conditioning procedures. Previous research has suggested that blocking may occur during equivalence class formation. Although both match-to-sample and respondent-type training have been used to establish equivalence classes, blocking has only been studied using match to sample procedures. Previous research on blocking in equivalence class formation did not utilize control groups, limiting the conclusions drawn from those studies. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to compare match-to-sample and respondent-type training for their susceptibility to blocking in three-member equivalence classes using control conditions. Method: A total of 27 participants were exposed to match-to-sample or respondent-type training procedures to form equivalence classes using a linear series training structure. Within each training procedure, one group of participants was exposed to a blocking condition and one was not. Results: Results indicated that the blocking did not occur for the 4 of 6 participants who formed equivalence classes. Patterns of responding that would be expected if blocking occurred were seen in both experimental and control conditions. Conclusions: Results obtained in the current study indicate that some processes other than blocking are involved when stimuli fail to enter equivalence classes. Future research should examine other processes involved when stimuli fail to enter into equivalence classes after training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹配样本训练和应答型训练建立的等价类的阻塞效应分析
背景/目的:当先前的一个刺激的条件反射减少或阻碍了训练或条件反射过程中第二个多余刺激的条件反射时,就会发生阻滞。先前的研究表明,阻塞可能发生在等效类形成过程中。虽然匹配样本和被调查者类型的训练都被用来建立等效类,但阻塞只使用匹配样本程序进行了研究。以往关于等效类形成中的阻滞的研究没有使用对照组,限制了这些研究得出的结论。因此,本研究的目的是比较匹配样本和受访者类型的训练,他们的易感性阻塞在三人等效类使用控制条件。方法:采用线性序列训练结构,对27名参与者进行匹配样本或受访者型训练,形成等价类。在每个训练过程中,一组参与者暴露在阻塞条件下,另一组没有。结果:结果表明,6名参与者中有4名形成等效班级,没有发生阻塞。在实验和控制条件下都可以看到发生阻塞时预期的反应模式。结论:本研究的结果表明,当刺激未能进入等效类时,除了阻断外,还涉及一些其他过程。未来的研究应该检查当刺激在训练后未能进入等效类时所涉及的其他过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-Traumatic Stress Reaction Factors in Individuals Quarantined Due to Contact with COVID-19 Infected Individuals Burnout in Referees: Relations with Stress, Cognitive Appraisal, and Emotions French Validation of the Life Engagement Test Scale The Effect of Cognitive Dissonance on Perceptions of Emotion Hidden in Plain Sight: The Psychological Benefits of Personal Quantification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1