Reducing Admission for Anaphylaxis in a Pediatric Emergency Department Using a Clinical Decision Support Tool

K. Wolpert, Rebecca Kestle, Nicholas Weaver, Kelly Huynh, M. Yoo, R. Nelson, R. Lane
{"title":"Reducing Admission for Anaphylaxis in a Pediatric Emergency Department Using a Clinical Decision Support Tool","authors":"K. Wolpert, Rebecca Kestle, Nicholas Weaver, Kelly Huynh, M. Yoo, R. Nelson, R. Lane","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening condition necessitating emergent management. However, the benefits of prolonged observation and indications for hospitalization are not well established. Through the implementation of a disposition-focused clinical decision support tool (CDST), this quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce hospitalization for low-risk patients presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED) with anaphylaxis from 49% to ≤12% within 12 months of implementation. Methods: The intervention included patients 18 years and younger of age presenting with anaphylaxis to the PED. A multidisciplinary team identified a 2006 evidence-based guideline as a significant contributor to hospitalization. The updated guideline incorporated a disposition-focused CDST that stratified patients as low-risk or high-risk and recommended discharge of low-risk patients after a 4-hour observation period. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of low-risk patients hospitalized. Balancing measures included low-risk patient 72-hour return rate and PED length of stay for all comers. Secondary outcomes included a focused cost analysis. Results: Fifty-three children preintervention and 43 children postintervention presenting with anaphylaxis met low-risk criteria. Postimplementation, hospitalization of low-risk patients decreased from 49% to 7% (P < 0.0001). No low-risk patients returned in 72 hours for an anaphylaxis-related concern (P = 0.83). The median PED length of stay increased from 189 to 193 minutes (P < 0.0001). The median cost per low-risk encounter decreased by $377 (P = 0.013). Conclusions: After implementing an evidence-based disposition-focused CDST, hospitalization of low-risk patients presenting to the PED with anaphylaxis significantly decreased without an increase in 72-hour returns. In addition, patient encounters demonstrated cost savings.","PeriodicalId":343243,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening condition necessitating emergent management. However, the benefits of prolonged observation and indications for hospitalization are not well established. Through the implementation of a disposition-focused clinical decision support tool (CDST), this quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce hospitalization for low-risk patients presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED) with anaphylaxis from 49% to ≤12% within 12 months of implementation. Methods: The intervention included patients 18 years and younger of age presenting with anaphylaxis to the PED. A multidisciplinary team identified a 2006 evidence-based guideline as a significant contributor to hospitalization. The updated guideline incorporated a disposition-focused CDST that stratified patients as low-risk or high-risk and recommended discharge of low-risk patients after a 4-hour observation period. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of low-risk patients hospitalized. Balancing measures included low-risk patient 72-hour return rate and PED length of stay for all comers. Secondary outcomes included a focused cost analysis. Results: Fifty-three children preintervention and 43 children postintervention presenting with anaphylaxis met low-risk criteria. Postimplementation, hospitalization of low-risk patients decreased from 49% to 7% (P < 0.0001). No low-risk patients returned in 72 hours for an anaphylaxis-related concern (P = 0.83). The median PED length of stay increased from 189 to 193 minutes (P < 0.0001). The median cost per low-risk encounter decreased by $377 (P = 0.013). Conclusions: After implementing an evidence-based disposition-focused CDST, hospitalization of low-risk patients presenting to the PED with anaphylaxis significantly decreased without an increase in 72-hour returns. In addition, patient encounters demonstrated cost savings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用临床决策支持工具减少儿科急诊科的过敏反应入院率
简介:过敏反应是一种危及生命的疾病,需要紧急处理。然而,长期观察的益处和住院的适应症尚未得到很好的确定。通过实施以处置为重点的临床决策支持工具(CDST),这一质量改进举措旨在将在实施后12个月内因过敏反应就诊儿科急诊科(PED)的低风险患者的住院率从49%降至≤12%。方法:干预对象为18岁及以下出现PED过敏反应的患者。一个多学科小组确定了2006年的循证指南是住院治疗的重要因素。更新后的指南纳入了以病情为重点的CDST,将患者分层为低风险或高风险,并建议低风险患者在4小时观察期后出院。主要结局指标是低危患者住院的百分比。平衡措施包括低危患者72小时复诊率和所有患者的PED住院时间。次要结果包括集中的成本分析。结果:53例干预前和43例干预后出现过敏反应的儿童符合低危标准。实施后,低危患者的住院率从49%下降到7% (P < 0.0001)。无低危患者在72小时内因过敏相关问题返回(P = 0.83)。中位PED停留时间从189分钟增加到193分钟(P < 0.0001)。每次低风险遭遇的中位数成本降低了377美元(P = 0.013)。结论:在实施以证据为基础的以倾向为中心的CDST后,出现PED并伴有过敏反应的低风险患者的住院率显著降低,而72小时的复诊率没有增加。此外,患者就诊证明节省了成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department Utilizing Clinical Decision Support in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection across a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network Pediatric Inpatient Leaders, Views Changed with COVID-19: A Call to Re-engage in Quality Improvement Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter New strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1