Animal Representation on UK Children’s Television

Lynda Korimboccus
{"title":"Animal Representation on UK Children’s Television","authors":"Lynda Korimboccus","doi":"10.31165/nk.2021.142.651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that television is a powerful medium and that its influence, particularly on children and young people, can be profound (see for example Canadian Paediatric Society 2003; Strasburger 2004; Matyjas 2015). The representation and categorisation of non-humans in such content may therefore influence a culture’s attitudes towards those species and, by extension, its children’s views. This article investigates animal characters on three hundred and fourteen children’s TV shows across five days of ‘free’ to view UK programming during summer 2020, and is the first study in over twenty-five years (since Elizabeth Paul’s in 1996) to focus specifically on mainstream children’s TV, and the only one to have sole regard for pre- and early primary-age UK viewers. With research clear that the media is so influential, recognising the role of such culture transmission is vital to ‘undo’ unhelpful assumptions about animals that result in their exploitation, and change future norms (Joy 2009). Television media either ignores or misrepresents the subjective reality of many (particularly food) species, but with children preferring anthropomorphised animals to most others (Geerdts, Van de Walle and LoBue 2016), this carries implications in terms of responsibility for our ideas and subsequent treatment of those non-humans in everyday life.","PeriodicalId":299414,"journal":{"name":"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2021.142.651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is widely accepted that television is a powerful medium and that its influence, particularly on children and young people, can be profound (see for example Canadian Paediatric Society 2003; Strasburger 2004; Matyjas 2015). The representation and categorisation of non-humans in such content may therefore influence a culture’s attitudes towards those species and, by extension, its children’s views. This article investigates animal characters on three hundred and fourteen children’s TV shows across five days of ‘free’ to view UK programming during summer 2020, and is the first study in over twenty-five years (since Elizabeth Paul’s in 1996) to focus specifically on mainstream children’s TV, and the only one to have sole regard for pre- and early primary-age UK viewers. With research clear that the media is so influential, recognising the role of such culture transmission is vital to ‘undo’ unhelpful assumptions about animals that result in their exploitation, and change future norms (Joy 2009). Television media either ignores or misrepresents the subjective reality of many (particularly food) species, but with children preferring anthropomorphised animals to most others (Geerdts, Van de Walle and LoBue 2016), this carries implications in terms of responsibility for our ideas and subsequent treatment of those non-humans in everyday life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国儿童电视节目中的动物代表
人们普遍认为,电视是一种强大的媒介,其影响,特别是对儿童和年轻人的影响可能是深远的(例如,见加拿大儿科学会2003年;斯特拉斯堡2004;Matyjas 2015)。因此,在这些内容中对非人类的表现和分类可能会影响一种文化对这些物种的态度,进而影响其子女的看法。本文调查了2020年夏季为期五天的“免费”观看英国节目中的314个儿童电视节目中的动物角色,这是25年来(自1996年伊丽莎白·保罗以来)第一次专门关注主流儿童电视节目的研究,也是唯一一个只关注英国学前和早期小学观众的研究。研究清楚地表明,媒体是如此有影响力,认识到这种文化传播的作用对于“消除”导致动物被剥削的无益假设,并改变未来的规范至关重要(Joy 2009)。电视媒体要么忽视要么歪曲了许多物种(尤其是食物)的主观现实,但孩子们更喜欢拟人化的动物,而不是大多数其他动物(Geerdts, Van de Walle和LoBue 2016),这就意味着我们对日常生活中那些非人类的想法和后续处理负有责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Affective Database: 'Symulation' and Enacting Worldhood in the Film-worlds of Scott Barley Climate, Creatures and COVID-19: Environment and Animals in Twenty-First Century Media Discourse Book Review: Filling the Ark: Animal Welfare in Disasters How ‘public’ is communicated in China’s public diplomacy: communicating environmental justice in the case of air pollution in China Animal Oppression and Solidarity: Examining Representations of Animals and Their Allies in Twenty-First Century Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1