Privacy, Information Acquisition, and Market Competition

Soo-jin Kim
{"title":"Privacy, Information Acquisition, and Market Competition","authors":"Soo-jin Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2940985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes how data-driven vertical integration between a platform and one downstream seller affects market outcomes in a two-sided market where sellers with asymmetric targeting skills target advertisements to individuals who have varying privacy concerns. I show that data-driven vertical integration leads to the incumbent's exclusive use of data. Therefore, a market entrant that has worse targeting technology than an incumbent is disproportionately harmed by such integration. The welfare analysis shows that integration can be welfare-reducing if consumers' privacy concerns are relatively high. Therefore, individually optimal decisions on data disclosure might not be socially optimal when aggregated.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2940985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper analyzes how data-driven vertical integration between a platform and one downstream seller affects market outcomes in a two-sided market where sellers with asymmetric targeting skills target advertisements to individuals who have varying privacy concerns. I show that data-driven vertical integration leads to the incumbent's exclusive use of data. Therefore, a market entrant that has worse targeting technology than an incumbent is disproportionately harmed by such integration. The welfare analysis shows that integration can be welfare-reducing if consumers' privacy concerns are relatively high. Therefore, individually optimal decisions on data disclosure might not be socially optimal when aggregated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私、信息获取与市场竞争
本文分析了数据驱动的平台和下游卖家之间的垂直整合如何在双边市场中影响市场结果,在双边市场中,具有非对称定位技能的卖家将广告定向到具有不同隐私关注的个人。我展示了数据驱动的垂直集成导致在位者独占使用数据。因此,如果市场进入者的定位技术比现有者差,那么这种整合对他们的伤害就不成比例。福利分析表明,如果消费者对隐私的关注相对较高,那么整合可能会减少福利。因此,数据披露的个人最优决策在汇总时可能不是社会最优决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed Hype Cycles: Dynamic Information Design with Two Audiences A Mechanism and Matching in a Social Dilemma The quasi-sorting equilibrium and incentive effects in parallel contests with multiple types of players Competition and Selection in Credit Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1