Whose stream is this anyway? Exploring layers of viewer-integration in online participatory videos

Weller Kevin, Holaschke Michael
{"title":"Whose stream is this anyway? Exploring layers of viewer-integration in online participatory videos","authors":"Weller Kevin, Holaschke Michael","doi":"10.5897/jmcs2021.0760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within this paper, we explore variants of user-integrating (live) videos as examples of collaborative practices in social media. We propose an empirically informed typology of layers of user-integration in terms of: (A) directness / ‘bodiliness’ of interaction, (B) Unfinishedness in the content at hand and (C) Productive tensions through streamer-audience-interactions. As an example of spontaneously emerging (virtual) communities of practices, we argue that analyzing IOPVs - integrated, online participatory videos – allows us to outline the conditions for such participatory formats to unfold, and how video-communities engage with them. In this analysis, we connect to methodical literature on online participant-videos, applying ethnographic research-methods to our main case-studies ‘chAIR Speedtest’, ‘Snappy’s Chain-Stich’ and ‘Miko’s tormenting chat’, explicitly exploring methods of tracing viewer-producer-interactions. Here, we also add to conceptual literature on participatory (live) videos by questioning the understanding of live-participation as fundamentally peaceful collaboration. Here, our analytical categories (A-C) help us to get a broader understanding of the dynamics that keep such formats going and the required translation-practices from both viewer and video-producer alike. We conclude by summarizing our results and by discussing the issue of responsibility regarding (video) contents that emerge from such an asymmetrical collaboration.","PeriodicalId":126106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Communication Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/jmcs2021.0760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within this paper, we explore variants of user-integrating (live) videos as examples of collaborative practices in social media. We propose an empirically informed typology of layers of user-integration in terms of: (A) directness / ‘bodiliness’ of interaction, (B) Unfinishedness in the content at hand and (C) Productive tensions through streamer-audience-interactions. As an example of spontaneously emerging (virtual) communities of practices, we argue that analyzing IOPVs - integrated, online participatory videos – allows us to outline the conditions for such participatory formats to unfold, and how video-communities engage with them. In this analysis, we connect to methodical literature on online participant-videos, applying ethnographic research-methods to our main case-studies ‘chAIR Speedtest’, ‘Snappy’s Chain-Stich’ and ‘Miko’s tormenting chat’, explicitly exploring methods of tracing viewer-producer-interactions. Here, we also add to conceptual literature on participatory (live) videos by questioning the understanding of live-participation as fundamentally peaceful collaboration. Here, our analytical categories (A-C) help us to get a broader understanding of the dynamics that keep such formats going and the required translation-practices from both viewer and video-producer alike. We conclude by summarizing our results and by discussing the issue of responsibility regarding (video) contents that emerge from such an asymmetrical collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这到底是谁的溪流?探索在线参与式视频中观众整合的层次
在本文中,我们探索了用户集成(实时)视频的变体,作为社交媒体协作实践的示例。我们根据经验提出了一种用户整合层次的类型学:(A)互动的直接性/“身体性”,(B)手头内容的未完成性,以及(C)通过流媒体-观众-互动产生的生产紧张。作为自发出现的(虚拟)实践社区的一个例子,我们认为,分析iopv(集成的在线参与性视频)使我们能够概述这种参与性格式展开的条件,以及视频社区如何与它们互动。在本分析中,我们结合了在线参与者视频的系统文献,将人种学研究方法应用于我们的主要案例研究“chAIR Speedtest”、“Snappy’s Chain-Stich”和“Miko’s折磨人的聊天”,明确探索了追踪观众-生产者互动的方法。在这里,我们还通过质疑将现场参与理解为基本的和平合作来增加参与式(直播)视频的概念性文献。在这里,我们的分析分类(a - c)帮助我们更广泛地理解保持这种格式的动力,以及观众和视频制作者都需要的翻译实践。最后,我们总结了我们的结果,并讨论了这种不对称合作中出现的(视频)内容的责任问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmaceutical companies Twitter communications: Engagement and message frames Assessment of communication interventions to improve the livelihood of rural community in Ethiopia: The case of Sidama Region Social media engagement and democracy: Understanding the impact of social media on youth civic engagement in Tanzania Looking for low-key: Noir and Neo-Noir from a cinematographic perspective Interventions and messaging in behaviour change communication response to COVID-19: A qualitative analysis of covid campaign in Kenya coastal counties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1