Microdose Flare-up Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Protocol and GnRH Antagonist Protocol: Effects on In-vitro Fertilization in Patients with Poor-responder Diagnosis According to Bologna Criteria

Gökşen Görgülü, Merve Çakır Köle, O. Aldemir, E. Köle, S. Dilbaz
{"title":"Microdose Flare-up Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Protocol and GnRH Antagonist Protocol: Effects on In-vitro Fertilization in Patients with Poor-responder Diagnosis According to Bologna Criteria","authors":"Gökşen Görgülü, Merve Çakır Köle, O. Aldemir, E. Köle, S. Dilbaz","doi":"10.46328/aejog.v3i2.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate microdose flare-up Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol with respect to their effects on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) results in patients with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna Criteria. \nMaterial Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the Assisted Reproduction clinic of University of Health Sciences, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Gynaecology Training and Research Hospital. A total of 645 patients who had been diagnosed as poor responders in our clinic, between 2007 and 2018, and received treatment with either microdose flare-up GnRH agonist protocol (n=250, 38.8%) or GnRH antagonist protocol (n=395, 61.2%), were included in the study. \nResults: The mean age of the study group was 34.5±5.5 years. Comparisons showed that IVF cycle cancellation frequency (p<0.01), third day estradiol level (p=0.04) and third day follicle stimulating hormone level (p<0.01) were significantly greater in patients who underwent the microdose flare-up protocol. In the GnRH antagonist group, the number of surviving children (p=0.01), antral follicle count (p<0.01), follicle count on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (p<0.01), endometrial thickness on hCG day (p<0.01), number of oocytes collected (p<0.01), mature oocyte count (p<0.01), embryo transfer number (p<0.01) were higher compared to the microdose flare-up protocol group. The two groups were similar in terms of clinical pregnancy rate. \nConclusions: In terms of clinical pregnancy rate, the IVF results of microdose flare-up and GnRH antagonist protocols are similar. Further studies are needed to reach more comprehensive results on the subject.","PeriodicalId":159256,"journal":{"name":"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/aejog.v3i2.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate microdose flare-up Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol with respect to their effects on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) results in patients with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna Criteria. Material Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the Assisted Reproduction clinic of University of Health Sciences, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Gynaecology Training and Research Hospital. A total of 645 patients who had been diagnosed as poor responders in our clinic, between 2007 and 2018, and received treatment with either microdose flare-up GnRH agonist protocol (n=250, 38.8%) or GnRH antagonist protocol (n=395, 61.2%), were included in the study. Results: The mean age of the study group was 34.5±5.5 years. Comparisons showed that IVF cycle cancellation frequency (p<0.01), third day estradiol level (p=0.04) and third day follicle stimulating hormone level (p<0.01) were significantly greater in patients who underwent the microdose flare-up protocol. In the GnRH antagonist group, the number of surviving children (p=0.01), antral follicle count (p<0.01), follicle count on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (p<0.01), endometrial thickness on hCG day (p<0.01), number of oocytes collected (p<0.01), mature oocyte count (p<0.01), embryo transfer number (p<0.01) were higher compared to the microdose flare-up protocol group. The two groups were similar in terms of clinical pregnancy rate. Conclusions: In terms of clinical pregnancy rate, the IVF results of microdose flare-up and GnRH antagonist protocols are similar. Further studies are needed to reach more comprehensive results on the subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微剂量促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂方案和GnRH拮抗剂方案:根据博洛尼亚标准诊断为不良反应的患者对体外受精的影响
目的:本研究的目的是根据博洛尼亚标准评估微剂量促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂方案和GnRH拮抗剂方案对卵巢反应差的患者体外受精(IVF)结果的影响。材料方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,在健康科学大学辅助生殖诊所进行,Etlik z beyde Hanım妇科培训与研究医院。在2007年至2018年期间,共有645名患者在我们的诊所被诊断为不良反应,并接受了微剂量突发GnRH激动剂方案(n=250, 38.8%)或GnRH拮抗剂方案(n=395, 61.2%)的治疗。结果:研究组患者平均年龄34.5±5.5岁。比较发现,接受微剂量发作方案的患者体外受精周期取消频率(p<0.01)、第3天雌二醇水平(p=0.04)和第3天促卵泡激素水平(p<0.01)显著高于接受微剂量发作方案的患者。GnRH拮抗剂组患儿存活数(p=0.01)、窦卵泡计数(p<0.01)、人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)给药第1天卵泡计数(p<0.01)、hCG第1天子宫内膜厚度(p<0.01)、收集卵母细胞数(p<0.01)、成熟卵母细胞计数(p<0.01)、胚胎移植数(p<0.01)均高于微剂量启动方案组。两组临床妊娠率相近。结论:在临床妊娠率方面,微剂量急性发作与GnRH拮抗剂方案的IVF结果相似。需要进一步的研究才能在这个问题上取得更全面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of an antioxidant agent-multivitamin complex food supplement on spermiogram in infertile men The effect of anti-phospholipid syndrome on pregnancy outcomes in patients with habitual abortus Results of karyotype analysis and 22q11.2 (DiGeorge Syndrome critical region) deletion investigation in fetal cardiac system anomalies Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes of emergency cesarean deliveries in cases of placenta previa uncomplicated with placenta acreata spectrum Impact of the type of ductus venosus agenesis and the presence of associated anomalies on prognosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1