An Integrative and Transdisciplinary Approach for a Human-Centered Design of AI-Based Work Systems

Larissa Schlicht, Marlen Melzer, Ulrike Rösler, Stefan Voß, S. Vock
{"title":"An Integrative and Transdisciplinary Approach for a Human-Centered Design of AI-Based Work Systems","authors":"Larissa Schlicht, Marlen Melzer, Ulrike Rösler, Stefan Voß, S. Vock","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Psychological and ethical criteria are to date not systematically covered in the system design process. We suggest to extend existing model-based system engineering approaches by new elements that are capable to capture these criteria and, in particular, allow for an implementation of psychological risk analysis and ethical evaluation of work systems already in the design phase.\n The need for a systematic integration of not only safety but also ethical and psychological criteria in the system design is strengthened by the growing complexity of work systems and the increasing use of artificial intelligence-based algorithms, which have the potential to replace distinctive human capabilities and are associated with a shift of responsibility from humans to machines.\n We identify essentially two factors impeding the development of an innovative integrative system design approach. First, at present, there is no legally predefined iterative process including an open feedback loop between the operator and the system designer that enables continuous risk assessment.\n Second, available methods do not provide a framework to integrate ethical and psychological criteria.\n We propose four steps for the development of an integrative system design approach: (1) an in-depth investigation of current methods suitable for holistic system design processes, (2) the development of a transdisciplinary terminology, (3) the development of a procedure which allows to identify ethical criteria meeting both individual and societal requirements and (4) testing of the developed approach in a digital system model by using a suitable use case.","PeriodicalId":146533,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Psychological and ethical criteria are to date not systematically covered in the system design process. We suggest to extend existing model-based system engineering approaches by new elements that are capable to capture these criteria and, in particular, allow for an implementation of psychological risk analysis and ethical evaluation of work systems already in the design phase. The need for a systematic integration of not only safety but also ethical and psychological criteria in the system design is strengthened by the growing complexity of work systems and the increasing use of artificial intelligence-based algorithms, which have the potential to replace distinctive human capabilities and are associated with a shift of responsibility from humans to machines. We identify essentially two factors impeding the development of an innovative integrative system design approach. First, at present, there is no legally predefined iterative process including an open feedback loop between the operator and the system designer that enables continuous risk assessment. Second, available methods do not provide a framework to integrate ethical and psychological criteria. We propose four steps for the development of an integrative system design approach: (1) an in-depth investigation of current methods suitable for holistic system design processes, (2) the development of a transdisciplinary terminology, (3) the development of a procedure which allows to identify ethical criteria meeting both individual and societal requirements and (4) testing of the developed approach in a digital system model by using a suitable use case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人为本的人工智能工作系统设计的综合和跨学科方法
到目前为止,在系统设计过程中还没有系统地涵盖心理和伦理标准。我们建议通过能够捕获这些标准的新元素来扩展现有的基于模型的系统工程方法,特别是允许在设计阶段对工作系统进行心理风险分析和道德评估的实现。随着工作系统的日益复杂和基于人工智能的算法的越来越多的使用,不仅需要系统地整合安全标准,还需要系统地整合系统设计中的道德和心理标准,这些算法有可能取代人类的独特能力,并与从人类到机器的责任转移有关。我们确定了阻碍创新综合系统设计方法发展的两个主要因素。首先,目前还没有法律上预先定义的迭代过程,包括作业者和系统设计者之间的开放反馈回路,以实现持续的风险评估。其次,现有的方法没有提供一个框架来整合伦理和心理标准。我们提出了开发综合系统设计方法的四个步骤:(1)对适合整体系统设计过程的当前方法进行深入调查,(2)开发跨学科术语,(3)开发允许确定符合个人和社会要求的道德标准的程序,以及(4)通过使用合适的用例在数字系统模型中测试开发的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Prediction Software to Evaluate Frisbee Movement An Imperfect Usage-Based Preventive Maintenance Planning Model for Railway Track Superstructures Development of Algorithms for Improving Fiber-Optical Rail Circuit on Railway Spans Design, Modeling, and Fabrication of a Ventilator Prototype - A Successful Student Project Story An Overview of the Research Landscape in the Field of Safe Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1