Trends in respect of specialization of commercial disputes judiciary

Goran Koevski, Darko Spasevski
{"title":"Trends in respect of specialization of commercial disputes judiciary","authors":"Goran Koevski, Darko Spasevski","doi":"10.5937/rkspp1901237k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the authors are analyzing the trends of the development of the special- are analyzing the trends of the development of the specialization of courts in the field of commercial disputes. Through the analysis, the authors set forth the arguments “pro” and “against” the specialization of the judiciary in this legal field. Also, the authors are analyzing the models of specialization of the judiciary. Special attention is paid to analyzing the experiences of the United States of America, United Kingdom, Ger-many, France, Italy, Switzerland and the Netherlands, as well as countries from the region, such as Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro. The Macedonian judicial experience in this area is analyzed in both periods of development, the period before the abolition of the commercial courts and the period after their abolition.","PeriodicalId":236613,"journal":{"name":"Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/rkspp1901237k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the authors are analyzing the trends of the development of the special- are analyzing the trends of the development of the specialization of courts in the field of commercial disputes. Through the analysis, the authors set forth the arguments “pro” and “against” the specialization of the judiciary in this legal field. Also, the authors are analyzing the models of specialization of the judiciary. Special attention is paid to analyzing the experiences of the United States of America, United Kingdom, Ger-many, France, Italy, Switzerland and the Netherlands, as well as countries from the region, such as Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro. The Macedonian judicial experience in this area is analyzed in both periods of development, the period before the abolition of the commercial courts and the period after their abolition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商事纠纷司法专业化的发展趋势
本文分析了商事争议领域法院专业化的发展趋势,分析了商事争议领域法院专业化的发展趋势。通过分析,作者提出了司法专业化在这一法律领域的“赞成”和“反对”之说。同时,对司法专业化的模式进行了分析。特别注意分析美利坚合众国、联合王国、德国、法国、意大利、瑞士和荷兰以及该区域国家,如塞尔维亚、克罗地亚和黑山的经验。马其顿在这一领域的司法经验在两个发展时期,即废除商事法庭之前的时期和废除商事法庭之后的时期进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International commercial arbitration and private international law Model proceedings or procedure for solving contested legal issues: Similarities and differences Dispute review/adjudication boards: One more alternative to court litigation Right to a clean environment: Role of contracts and contract law Consumer ADR: The Albanian experience in transposing EU Directive 2013/11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1