How changing API terms changed Instagram's domain? A bibliometric analysis

R. Hartman, T. Šímová
{"title":"How changing API terms changed Instagram's domain? A bibliometric analysis","authors":"R. Hartman, T. Šímová","doi":"10.1145/3477911.3477923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018 Facebook blocked a public Application Programming Interfaces (API) that could be used to download data from Facebook and Instagram. Much uncertainty still exists about the effect on social media research due to changes in Instagram API conditions. The presented paper provides an overview of the Instagram domain in terms of a research area. The main focus of this research is on the comparison of the key topics before and after the change of the Instagram API terms (comparing Instagram's research domain before and after 2018). A partial goal was to find out how the change in the conditions of the Instagram API has changed the number of social media research itself. We used a bibliometric approach to map the domain of Instagram. The paper has identified key topics in the domain of Instagram. Between the years 2010 and 2018 the key topics were gender, behavior on social media, dissemination of information, and platform selection. After the change of Instagram API conditions, after 2018, the key topics were gratifications, body image, dissatisfaction, and basic Instagram topics. The paper has found that generally, there was no change in research topics, nor the number of papers published after the Instagram API condition. Further study should focus on establish the relationships between Instagram use and psychological well-being; investigate the motives for Instagram use a study the effect of Instagram API on research with the use of different methods; gaining a better understanding of social media consumer activity; establish whatever our key topics are relevant to other social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter or Tiktok); study Instagram domain on different citation databases (e.g., in Scopus). This paper has also raised important questions about whether the Instagram API should be or should not be open for research purposes.","PeriodicalId":174824,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Computer Technology Applications","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Computer Technology Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3477911.3477923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2018 Facebook blocked a public Application Programming Interfaces (API) that could be used to download data from Facebook and Instagram. Much uncertainty still exists about the effect on social media research due to changes in Instagram API conditions. The presented paper provides an overview of the Instagram domain in terms of a research area. The main focus of this research is on the comparison of the key topics before and after the change of the Instagram API terms (comparing Instagram's research domain before and after 2018). A partial goal was to find out how the change in the conditions of the Instagram API has changed the number of social media research itself. We used a bibliometric approach to map the domain of Instagram. The paper has identified key topics in the domain of Instagram. Between the years 2010 and 2018 the key topics were gender, behavior on social media, dissemination of information, and platform selection. After the change of Instagram API conditions, after 2018, the key topics were gratifications, body image, dissatisfaction, and basic Instagram topics. The paper has found that generally, there was no change in research topics, nor the number of papers published after the Instagram API condition. Further study should focus on establish the relationships between Instagram use and psychological well-being; investigate the motives for Instagram use a study the effect of Instagram API on research with the use of different methods; gaining a better understanding of social media consumer activity; establish whatever our key topics are relevant to other social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter or Tiktok); study Instagram domain on different citation databases (e.g., in Scopus). This paper has also raised important questions about whether the Instagram API should be or should not be open for research purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
API条款的变化如何改变Instagram的域名?文献计量学分析
2018年,Facebook阻止了一个可用于从Facebook和Instagram下载数据的公共应用程序编程接口(API)。由于Instagram API条件的变化,对社交媒体研究的影响仍然存在很多不确定性。本文提供了一个研究领域的Instagram领域的概述。本研究的主要重点是对Instagram API术语变化前后的关键主题进行比较(比较2018年前后Instagram的研究领域)。部分目标是找出Instagram API条件的变化如何改变了社交媒体研究本身的数量。我们使用文献计量学方法来绘制Instagram的域。本文确定了Instagram领域的关键主题。在2010年至2018年期间,关键主题是性别、社交媒体上的行为、信息传播和平台选择。Instagram API条件改变后,2018年之后,重点话题是满足、身体形象、不满意和Instagram基础话题。本文发现,总体而言,Instagram API条件后,研究课题和论文发表数量没有变化。进一步的研究应侧重于建立Instagram使用与心理健康之间的关系;调查使用Instagram的动机,研究Instagram API对研究的影响,使用不同的方法;更好地了解社交媒体消费者活动;建立与其他社交媒体平台(Facebook、Twitter或Tiktok)相关的任何关键话题;在不同的引文数据库(如Scopus)上研究Instagram域。本文还提出了关于Instagram API是否应该开放用于研究目的的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying Ethereum Smart Contracts to Blockchain-Based Crowdfunding System to Increase Trust and Information Symmetry Video Analytics Architecture with Metadata Event-Engine for Urban Safe Cities Integrated Planning of Operating Expenditures (OPEX) - A model to apply best practices when running ERP and DWH systems Converting Manufacturing Companies into Data-Driven Enterprises: an Evaluation of the Transformation Model Design Workflows and Algorithm Diagrams Interpretation Method in Software Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1