The Great Financial Crisis of 1914: What Can We Learn from Aldrich-Vreeland Emergency Currency?

W. Silber
{"title":"The Great Financial Crisis of 1914: What Can We Learn from Aldrich-Vreeland Emergency Currency?","authors":"W. Silber","doi":"10.1257/AER.97.2.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the outbreak of World War I, the biggest gold outflow in a generation posed a double-barreled threat to American finance: An internal drain of currency from the banking system and an external drain of gold to Europe. The absence of an operational central bank encouraged Treasury Secretary William G. McAdoo to improvise the modern principle of aiming an independent weapon at each policy target. He employed a form of capital controls to deal with the external threat, shutting the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for more than four months to prevent Europeans from selling their American securities and demanding gold in return. And he invoked the emergency currency provisions of the Aldrich-Vreeland Act to deal with the internal threat, allowing banks to issue national bank notes without the normal requirement that the currency be secured by U.S. goverment bonds. According to Friedman and Schwartz (1963, p.196), by November 1914 \"the country had recovered from... the declaration of war in Europe, thanks in no small part to the availability of Aldrich-Vreeland emergency currency.\" This paper tests Friedman and Schwartz's conjecture about the power of Aldrich-Vreeland emergency currency and draws lessons for monetary policy.","PeriodicalId":245549,"journal":{"name":"Business History eJournal","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.97.2.285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

At the outbreak of World War I, the biggest gold outflow in a generation posed a double-barreled threat to American finance: An internal drain of currency from the banking system and an external drain of gold to Europe. The absence of an operational central bank encouraged Treasury Secretary William G. McAdoo to improvise the modern principle of aiming an independent weapon at each policy target. He employed a form of capital controls to deal with the external threat, shutting the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for more than four months to prevent Europeans from selling their American securities and demanding gold in return. And he invoked the emergency currency provisions of the Aldrich-Vreeland Act to deal with the internal threat, allowing banks to issue national bank notes without the normal requirement that the currency be secured by U.S. goverment bonds. According to Friedman and Schwartz (1963, p.196), by November 1914 "the country had recovered from... the declaration of war in Europe, thanks in no small part to the availability of Aldrich-Vreeland emergency currency." This paper tests Friedman and Schwartz's conjecture about the power of Aldrich-Vreeland emergency currency and draws lessons for monetary policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1914年的金融危机:我们能从奥尔德里奇-弗里兰紧急货币中学到什么?
第一次世界大战爆发时,一代人以来最大规模的黄金外流给美国金融带来了双重威胁:银行体系内部的货币外流和欧洲外部的黄金外流。由于没有一个可操作的中央银行,财政部长威廉·g·麦卡杜(William G. McAdoo)即兴发挥了一种现代原则,即在每个政策目标上瞄准一件独立的武器。他采取了某种形式的资本管制来应对外部威胁,关闭纽约证券交易所(NYSE)四个多月,以防止欧洲人出售他们的美国证券并要求黄金作为回报。他还援引了《奥尔德里奇-弗里兰法案》(Aldrich-Vreeland Act)中的紧急货币条款来应对内部威胁,允许银行发行国家银行券,而无需通常要求货币由美国政府债券担保。根据Friedman和Schwartz(1963,第196页)的说法,到1914年11月,“国家已经从……在欧洲宣战,这在很大程度上要归功于奥尔德里奇-弗里兰紧急货币的可用性。”本文对弗里德曼和施瓦茨关于奥尔德里奇-弗里兰紧急货币力量的猜想进行了检验,并为货币政策提供了借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity and Change in Construction Procurement William Henry Cavendish-Bentinck-Scott, 4th Duke of Portland Emergence of Modern Impersonal Exchange: Role of Formalization in the Rise of Modern Capitalism Samuelson’s Neoclassical Synthesis Did Not Betray Keynes: Keynes Had Offered Just Such a Synthesis in the General Theory, As Well As to Hicks and Harrod in Correspondence, in 1936 Longitudinal Study of Seylan Bank, Sri Lanka from 1996 to 2008
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1