Comparison of MPPT Techniques on THD Current in a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System

Ricsa Alhassane Soumana, Michael Juma Saulo, C. Muriithi
{"title":"Comparison of MPPT Techniques on THD Current in a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System","authors":"Ricsa Alhassane Soumana, Michael Juma Saulo, C. Muriithi","doi":"10.1109/gpecom55404.2022.9815606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most comparison studies of MPPT algorithms in the literature are undertaken in terms of their precision, speed, robustness under rapidly changing environmental conditions, etc... In grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems, Comparative studies of MPPT methods in terms of THD injected into the network are of significant importance. In this paper, two conventional MPPT methods, perturb and observation (P&O) and incremental conductance (IC), and two advanced MPPT methods, fuzzy logic control (FLC) and Sliding mode control (SMC), were studied and compared in terms of currents injected THD into the grid using MATLAB/Simulink. The grid-connected PV system under consideration is a two-stage unit that includes a classical boost converter and a two-level voltage source inverter. With the FLC and SMC-based MPPT methods, the injected current's THD was 1.34% and 1.99%, respectively. The IC MPPT technique has slightly outperformed the P&O one, with a THD current of 3.48% versus 3.68%. The simulations were run under identical conditions; the superior performance of a particular MPPT technique over others is principally reflected in the dc-link voltage fluctuation.","PeriodicalId":441321,"journal":{"name":"2022 4th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 4th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/gpecom55404.2022.9815606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Most comparison studies of MPPT algorithms in the literature are undertaken in terms of their precision, speed, robustness under rapidly changing environmental conditions, etc... In grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems, Comparative studies of MPPT methods in terms of THD injected into the network are of significant importance. In this paper, two conventional MPPT methods, perturb and observation (P&O) and incremental conductance (IC), and two advanced MPPT methods, fuzzy logic control (FLC) and Sliding mode control (SMC), were studied and compared in terms of currents injected THD into the grid using MATLAB/Simulink. The grid-connected PV system under consideration is a two-stage unit that includes a classical boost converter and a two-level voltage source inverter. With the FLC and SMC-based MPPT methods, the injected current's THD was 1.34% and 1.99%, respectively. The IC MPPT technique has slightly outperformed the P&O one, with a THD current of 3.48% versus 3.68%. The simulations were run under identical conditions; the superior performance of a particular MPPT technique over others is principally reflected in the dc-link voltage fluctuation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并网光伏系统THD电流MPPT技术比较
文献中大多数MPPT算法的比较研究都是在其精度、速度、快速变化环境条件下的鲁棒性等方面进行的。在光伏并网系统中,比较研究MPPT方法对电网注入THD的影响具有重要意义。本文利用MATLAB/Simulink,研究了扰动观测法(P&O)和增量电导法(IC)这两种传统的MPPT方法,以及模糊逻辑控制法(FLC)和滑模控制法(SMC)这两种先进的MPPT方法,并对THD注入电网的电流进行了比较。考虑中的并网光伏系统是一个两级单元,包括一个经典升压变换器和一个两电平电压源逆变器。基于FLC和smc的MPPT方法,注入电流的THD分别为1.34%和1.99%。IC MPPT技术的THD电流为3.48%,略优于P&O技术的3.68%。模拟在相同条件下进行;一种特定的MPPT技术优于其他技术的性能主要体现在直流链路电压波动上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conducted Emissions Analysis of DC-DC Buck Converter A Study on the Effect of Phase Shifter Quantization Error on the Spectral Efficiency Using Neural Network Delay Margin Computation of Generator Excitation Control System with Incommensurate Time Delays Using Critical Eigenvalue Tracing Method ICT Enabled Smart Street Parking System for Smart Cities Experimental Impact Analysis of the Refrigerator Cable Design On Disturbance Power Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1