Legislation as a Cause of Corruption in the Administrative Bodies of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adela Plakalo, Hazim Okanović, Salaahuddin Abdibegović
{"title":"Legislation as a Cause of Corruption in the Administrative Bodies of Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"Adela Plakalo, Hazim Okanović, Salaahuddin Abdibegović","doi":"10.53028/1986-6127.2021.12.2.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most important goal of this paper is to promote and emphasize the importance of detecting corruption risks in the legislative legislation, as a basis from which various forms of corruption can develop. Also, it is important in the theoretical analysis of the concept of corruption, as well as corruption risks and analysis of the assessment of susceptibility to corruption of draft laws and bylaws. In addition, the aim is to investigate the extent to which the assessment of susceptibility to corruption of laws and bylaws can prevent corruption, especially if we take into account that “ambiguity” in laws and bylaws, and the lack of “control mechanism” in them, the basis that leaves room corruption, ie key corruption risk. A quantitative approach to research was used in the paper. The survey was conducted at the local, cantonal, entity, and state levels on a representative and stratified sample. The research included managers in administrative bodies, professional associates and expert advisors in administrative bodies, as well as lawyers and lawyers employed in public institutions. The contribution also refers to a better understanding of the mechanisms for preventing corruption in administrative bodies through the establishment of a single authority and mechanisms for assessing the susceptibility of corruption to laws and bylaws, and mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of adopted laws and bylaws.","PeriodicalId":296646,"journal":{"name":"Uprava","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uprava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53028/1986-6127.2021.12.2.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most important goal of this paper is to promote and emphasize the importance of detecting corruption risks in the legislative legislation, as a basis from which various forms of corruption can develop. Also, it is important in the theoretical analysis of the concept of corruption, as well as corruption risks and analysis of the assessment of susceptibility to corruption of draft laws and bylaws. In addition, the aim is to investigate the extent to which the assessment of susceptibility to corruption of laws and bylaws can prevent corruption, especially if we take into account that “ambiguity” in laws and bylaws, and the lack of “control mechanism” in them, the basis that leaves room corruption, ie key corruption risk. A quantitative approach to research was used in the paper. The survey was conducted at the local, cantonal, entity, and state levels on a representative and stratified sample. The research included managers in administrative bodies, professional associates and expert advisors in administrative bodies, as well as lawyers and lawyers employed in public institutions. The contribution also refers to a better understanding of the mechanisms for preventing corruption in administrative bodies through the establishment of a single authority and mechanisms for assessing the susceptibility of corruption to laws and bylaws, and mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of adopted laws and bylaws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法是波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那行政机构腐败的一个原因
本文最重要的目的是促进和强调在立法立法中发现腐败风险的重要性,这是各种形式的腐败发展的基础。此外,在对腐败概念的理论分析,以及对腐败风险的分析和对法律和规章草案腐败易感性的评估方面也具有重要意义。此外,本文的目的是考察法律和细则的腐败易感性评估在多大程度上可以预防腐败,特别是考虑到法律和细则的“模糊性”,以及法律和细则中缺乏“控制机制”,这是留下空间腐败的基础,即关键腐败风险。本文采用了定量研究方法。该调查是在地方、州、实体和州一级进行的,具有代表性和分层抽样。研究对象包括行政机构的管理人员、行政机构的专业助理和专家顾问,以及公共机构雇用的律师和律师。报告还提到,通过建立单一的权力机构和评估法律和细则对腐败的易感性的机制,以及监测已通过的法律和细则的执行情况的机制,更好地了解防止行政机构腐败的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative Dispute Within the Full Jurisdiction in Bosnia and Herzegovina - The Need and Significance Personal Health Data and the Significance of Its Administrative Protection The Reform Process of Introducing the Licensing of Primary and Secondary School Principals Sarajevo – Potential and Limitations in the Development of the City and Region Specificity of Non-tax Revenues of the State With Reference to Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1