Analysis of Current Trends and a First Assessment of the New Package

L. Hancher, F. Salerno, TILEC (Tilburg Law & Economic) Submitter
{"title":"Analysis of Current Trends and a First Assessment of the New Package","authors":"L. Hancher, F. Salerno, TILEC (Tilburg Law & Economic) Submitter","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2956308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With three waves of internal energy market legislation already adopted and a fourth just tabled, a key question is “do we have an institutional structure that can effectively deliver the ambitious goals of the EU energy and climate change policy?”. To answer this question, the chapter employs a benchmark comparison, using general EU competition law as a benchmark for an effectively enforced EU policy. It compares the current as well as the emerging institutional structure of EU energy market regulation with that of EU competition law, to assess the extent to which there is a ‘competition law-ization’ of energy market institutions. \nThe chapter finds that the Third Package of 2009 created an institutional structure that shares a number of features with competition law, hence laying the grounds for an effective institutional structure. The new ‘Winter’ package unveiled in November 2016 builds on the institutional acquis. However, there are also new trends – in particular a shift to relying on tools that require more Member State co-operation with the Commission. This trend might limit the effectiveness of competition law-ization unless such co-operation concerns aspects that are complementary to the core subject matter of competition law.","PeriodicalId":130313,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2956308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With three waves of internal energy market legislation already adopted and a fourth just tabled, a key question is “do we have an institutional structure that can effectively deliver the ambitious goals of the EU energy and climate change policy?”. To answer this question, the chapter employs a benchmark comparison, using general EU competition law as a benchmark for an effectively enforced EU policy. It compares the current as well as the emerging institutional structure of EU energy market regulation with that of EU competition law, to assess the extent to which there is a ‘competition law-ization’ of energy market institutions. The chapter finds that the Third Package of 2009 created an institutional structure that shares a number of features with competition law, hence laying the grounds for an effective institutional structure. The new ‘Winter’ package unveiled in November 2016 builds on the institutional acquis. However, there are also new trends – in particular a shift to relying on tools that require more Member State co-operation with the Commission. This trend might limit the effectiveness of competition law-ization unless such co-operation concerns aspects that are complementary to the core subject matter of competition law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前趋势分析和新一揽子计划的首次评估
欧盟已经通过了三波内部能源市场立法,第四波刚刚提出,一个关键问题是“我们是否拥有一个能够有效实现欧盟能源和气候变化政策雄心勃勃的目标的制度结构?”为了回答这个问题,本章采用基准比较,使用欧盟一般竞争法作为有效执行欧盟政策的基准。本文将欧盟能源市场监管的现行制度结构与欧盟竞争法的制度结构进行了比较,以评估能源市场机构的“竞争法化”程度。本章发现,2009年第三一揽子计划创造了一个与竞争法具有许多共同特征的制度结构,从而为有效的制度结构奠定了基础。2016年11月公布的新的“冬季”一揽子计划建立在机构收购的基础上。然而,也有新的趋势,特别是转向依赖需要更多成员国与委员会合作的工具。这种趋势可能限制竞争法化的有效性,除非这种合作涉及与竞争法的核心主题相补充的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calculating Cartel Damages Data Collaboratives, Competition Law and the Governance of EU Data Spaces The Effectiveness of European Antitrust Fines Unfair Pricing and Standard Essential Patents A Reform Too Few or a Reform Too Many: Judicial Review, Appeals or a Prosecutorial System under the UK Competition Act 1998?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1