{"title":"Waiting for the Barbarians","authors":"F. Nicola","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198871477.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter offers some methodological insights to those who wish to embark on a study of the archival history of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Through her voyage into this newly opened archive, the author unpacks the comparative legal history emerging from the jurisprudence of the ECJ, a supranational court embedded in different European legal traditions. The author relies on the findings of the new legal historians who have brought to the surface legal and political resistance to the constitutionalization narrative of the ECJ. She also relies on the work of sociologists who have focused on professional networks of Eurolawyers as a powerful engine for the integration and liberalization of the single market. By deploying these insights, the chapter offers a novel reading of the grands arrêts through the dossiers de procédure now open to the public in electronic format at the Historical Archives of the EU.","PeriodicalId":176122,"journal":{"name":"New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice","volume":"6a 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871477.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter offers some methodological insights to those who wish to embark on a study of the archival history of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Through her voyage into this newly opened archive, the author unpacks the comparative legal history emerging from the jurisprudence of the ECJ, a supranational court embedded in different European legal traditions. The author relies on the findings of the new legal historians who have brought to the surface legal and political resistance to the constitutionalization narrative of the ECJ. She also relies on the work of sociologists who have focused on professional networks of Eurolawyers as a powerful engine for the integration and liberalization of the single market. By deploying these insights, the chapter offers a novel reading of the grands arrêts through the dossiers de procédure now open to the public in electronic format at the Historical Archives of the EU.
本章为那些希望着手研究欧洲法院(ECJ)档案史的人提供了一些方法论见解。通过她对这个新开放档案的探索,作者揭示了欧洲法院(一个嵌入不同欧洲法律传统的超国家法院)的法理学中出现的比较法律史。作者依靠新法律历史学家的发现,他们将欧洲法院的宪法化叙事在法律和政治上的阻力带到了表面上。她还引用了社会学家的研究成果,这些社会学家关注欧洲律师的专业网络,认为它是单一市场一体化和自由化的强大引擎。通过运用这些见解,本章通过欧盟历史档案馆(Historical Archives of EU)目前以电子格式向公众开放的档案程序(dossiers de procsade),提供了一种对伟人arrêts的新颖解读。