Formation of research competence of border officers graduate students in the process of teaching the academic discipline «Theory and methodology of scientific argumentation»

Tushko K. Yu.
{"title":"Formation of research competence of border officers graduate students in the process of teaching the academic discipline «Theory and methodology of scientific argumentation»","authors":"Tushko K. Yu.","doi":"10.32755/SJEDUCATION.2021.01.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the solution of the scientific problem of improving the educational and scientific training of graduate students of the Border Guard Service of Ukraine. The problem of formation of research competence of graduate students in the process of teaching the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation” is analysed. The purpose of the article is to generalize the formation of research competence of associate professors in the teaching of the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation”. For this purpose, a number of scientific works on the topic of research authored by domestic and foreign scientists are analysed. The specifics of educational and scientific training of these specialists are revealed. The content and features of the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation” are analysed. A description of the research competence of graduate students is given. The author described the essence and content of competence: the ability to identify and justify current scientific problems, as well as to compile these problems for selected research, to carry out scientific procedures of analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction and others, to implement the results and formulate necessary scientific conclusions and recommendations. Difficulties in teaching the discipline “Theory and Methods of Scientific Argumentation” to adjuncts are identified: the first group of problems should include those due to the specifics of the system of higher military education in Ukraine: lack of systematic presentation of logical knowledge at the cadet level; reduction or elimination of classroom hours for teaching logic; humiliation of the status of logic in the system of humanitarian education; the second group of problems is related to the definition of the content of the discipline “Theory and Methods of Scientific Argumentation” for graduate students: lack of cooperation with teachers of the discipline “Theory and Methods of Scientific Argumentation” and special disciplines of graduate students; lack of content of the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation” for associate professors. The conclusions of the research and prospects for further research are formulated. Key words: graduate students; research competence; educational and scientific training; theory and methods of scientific argumentation; teaching, formation.","PeriodicalId":371803,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32755/SJEDUCATION.2021.01.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the solution of the scientific problem of improving the educational and scientific training of graduate students of the Border Guard Service of Ukraine. The problem of formation of research competence of graduate students in the process of teaching the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation” is analysed. The purpose of the article is to generalize the formation of research competence of associate professors in the teaching of the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation”. For this purpose, a number of scientific works on the topic of research authored by domestic and foreign scientists are analysed. The specifics of educational and scientific training of these specialists are revealed. The content and features of the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation” are analysed. A description of the research competence of graduate students is given. The author described the essence and content of competence: the ability to identify and justify current scientific problems, as well as to compile these problems for selected research, to carry out scientific procedures of analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction and others, to implement the results and formulate necessary scientific conclusions and recommendations. Difficulties in teaching the discipline “Theory and Methods of Scientific Argumentation” to adjuncts are identified: the first group of problems should include those due to the specifics of the system of higher military education in Ukraine: lack of systematic presentation of logical knowledge at the cadet level; reduction or elimination of classroom hours for teaching logic; humiliation of the status of logic in the system of humanitarian education; the second group of problems is related to the definition of the content of the discipline “Theory and Methods of Scientific Argumentation” for graduate students: lack of cooperation with teachers of the discipline “Theory and Methods of Scientific Argumentation” and special disciplines of graduate students; lack of content of the discipline “Theory and methods of scientific argumentation” for associate professors. The conclusions of the research and prospects for further research are formulated. Key words: graduate students; research competence; educational and scientific training; theory and methods of scientific argumentation; teaching, formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在《科学论证理论与方法论》学科教学过程中,边检员研究生科研能力的形成
本文提出了提高乌克兰边防局研究生教育和科学训练的科学问题的解决办法。分析了在《科学论证理论与方法》教学过程中研究生科研能力的形成问题。本文旨在对“科学论证理论与方法”学科副教授科研能力的形成进行概括。为此,本文对国内外科学家撰写的关于该研究主题的一些科学著作进行了分析。揭示了这些专家的教育和科学培训的具体情况。分析了“科学论证理论与方法”学科的内容和特点。对研究生的研究能力进行了描述。作者描述了能力的本质和内容:识别和证明当前科学问题的能力,以及将这些问题汇编为选定的研究,进行分析,综合,比较,抽象等科学程序,实施结果并制定必要的科学结论和建议的能力。确定了教授“科学论证的理论和方法”这门学科的困难:第一组问题应包括由于乌克兰高等军事教育系统的特殊性:在学员层面缺乏系统的逻辑知识呈现;减少或取消逻辑教学的课时;人文主义教育体系中逻辑地位的屈辱第二组问题与研究生“科学论证理论与方法”学科内容的界定有关:缺乏与研究生“科学论证理论与方法”学科和特殊学科教师的合作;副教授学科“科学论证理论与方法”课程内容不足。最后给出了研究结论和进一步研究的展望。关键词:研究生;研究能力;教育和科学培训;科学论证的理论与方法;教学中,形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC TRENDS OF THE LABOR MARKET IN THE CONDITIONS OF WAR ON THE ISSUE OF TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF COLLABORATION OR CONVICTED OF SUCH CRIMES DIFFERENTIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF ATTITUDES TOWARD WORK IN A STATE OF WAR TEST CONTROL OF THE LEVEL OF FORMATION OF ENGLISH LEXICAL COMPETENCE IN STUDENTS OF EDUCATION USING THE MEANS OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES SATISFACTION OF BACHELOR’S DEGREE STUDENTS OF SPECIALTY 012 «PRESCHOOL EDUCATION» WITH THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL COMPONENT OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1