Practices of conservation agricultural technologies in diverse cropping systems in Bangladesh.

M. Akterruzzaman, Hasneen Jahan, E. Haque
{"title":"Practices of conservation agricultural technologies in diverse cropping systems in Bangladesh.","authors":"M. Akterruzzaman, Hasneen Jahan, E. Haque","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.196770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High Yielding Varieties (HYV) along with chemical fertilizer, pesticides and irrigation had introduced in Bangladesh in the name of “Green Revolution” to feed the huge population of the country. This results degradation in soil health and reduce productivity in the long run. In this context, conservation agriculture (CA) is becoming increasingly important in overcoming the problems of declining agricultural productivity. This paper investigates the benefits and impacts of CA practiced by the farmers in Bangladesh. The study covered a range of soils and cropping systems for the evaluation of CA in Rajshahi; Mymensingh; Rajbari, and Thakurgaon districts. Data and information were gathered through focus group discussion (FGD), household survey, and case studies. A total of 458 households were interviewed considering the level of adoption of CA from different cropping systems. The results show that most of the farmers under Mymensingh and Thakurgaon districts don’t have any knowledge in sowing/transplanting by machineries whereas farmers in Rajbari and Rajshahi districts have comparatively better knowledge on this. Overall 76.45% respondents know the benefits of using organic matter in soil. For tillage operation, draft power use is higher than other machineries in all cropping seasons. The retention of crop residues was found higher in Boro rice compared to Aman and Aus rice and other crops. A few farm households had a little knowledge on how to improve soil health through retention of crop residues. Only 39.30% respondents practiced crop rotations, and 30% respondents practiced mixed cropping, and most of them experienced increased production. The major constraints of adoption of CA mentioned by the respondents are low production, more weeds, low animal feed, lower cooking fuel and bothering job. Providing adequate knowledge and training of CA should be provided to the farmers for sustainable agricultural productivity.","PeriodicalId":259792,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.196770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

High Yielding Varieties (HYV) along with chemical fertilizer, pesticides and irrigation had introduced in Bangladesh in the name of “Green Revolution” to feed the huge population of the country. This results degradation in soil health and reduce productivity in the long run. In this context, conservation agriculture (CA) is becoming increasingly important in overcoming the problems of declining agricultural productivity. This paper investigates the benefits and impacts of CA practiced by the farmers in Bangladesh. The study covered a range of soils and cropping systems for the evaluation of CA in Rajshahi; Mymensingh; Rajbari, and Thakurgaon districts. Data and information were gathered through focus group discussion (FGD), household survey, and case studies. A total of 458 households were interviewed considering the level of adoption of CA from different cropping systems. The results show that most of the farmers under Mymensingh and Thakurgaon districts don’t have any knowledge in sowing/transplanting by machineries whereas farmers in Rajbari and Rajshahi districts have comparatively better knowledge on this. Overall 76.45% respondents know the benefits of using organic matter in soil. For tillage operation, draft power use is higher than other machineries in all cropping seasons. The retention of crop residues was found higher in Boro rice compared to Aman and Aus rice and other crops. A few farm households had a little knowledge on how to improve soil health through retention of crop residues. Only 39.30% respondents practiced crop rotations, and 30% respondents practiced mixed cropping, and most of them experienced increased production. The major constraints of adoption of CA mentioned by the respondents are low production, more weeds, low animal feed, lower cooking fuel and bothering job. Providing adequate knowledge and training of CA should be provided to the farmers for sustainable agricultural productivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国不同种植制度下保护性农业技术的实践。
高产品种(HYV)以及化肥、农药和灌溉以“绿色革命”的名义引入孟加拉国,以养活该国庞大的人口。这导致土壤健康退化,从长远来看会降低生产力。在这种情况下,保护性农业(CA)在克服农业生产力下降的问题方面变得越来越重要。本文调查了孟加拉国农民实施农业生产的效益和影响。该研究涵盖了一系列土壤和种植制度,以评价拉杰沙希地区的CA;Mymensingh;Rajbari和Thakurgaon地区。通过焦点小组讨论(FGD)、住户调查和案例研究收集数据和信息。考虑到不同种植制度对CA的采用水平,总共采访了458个家庭。结果表明,Mymensingh和Thakurgaon地区的大多数农民对机械播种/移栽一无所知,而Rajbari和Rajshahi地区的农民对这方面的知识相对较好。总体而言,76.45%的受访者知道在土壤中使用有机物的好处。对于耕作作业,在所有种植季节,吃水功率都高于其他机械。水稻的作物残茬滞留率高于阿曼稻和澳大利亚稻及其他作物。少数农户对如何通过保留作物残茬来改善土壤健康知之甚少。只有39.30%的回答者实行轮作,30%的回答者实行混作,大多数回答者的产量都有所增加。受访者提到的采用CA的主要制约因素是产量低,杂草多,动物饲料少,烹饪燃料少,工作麻烦。应向农民提供足够的农业知识和培训,以实现可持续的农业生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DEMAND, SUPPLY AND REASONS FOR PRICE HIKE OF POTATO IN BANGLADESH WETLANDS ATTRIBUTES AND INFLUENCES ON FOOD SECURITY OF HOUSEHOLDS AROUND OGUN RIVER OF NIGERIA EFFECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES ON PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF CHICKPEA AND LENTIL IN RAJSHAHI DISTRICT FACTORS INFLUENCING THE USE OF MOBILE PAYMENT SERVICES IN SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND TECHNOLOGICAL GAP RATIOS OF TOMATO PRODUCTION IN NORTHERN NIGERIA: A STOCHASTIC META FRONTIER APPROACH:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1