Classificatory disputes and scientific controversies: society, nature, and culture in the Anthropocene

Felipe Barbosa Bertuluci, Leila da Costa Leila da Costa, Roberto Donato da Silva Júnior
{"title":"Classificatory disputes and scientific controversies: society, nature, and culture in the Anthropocene","authors":"Felipe Barbosa Bertuluci, Leila da Costa Leila da Costa, Roberto Donato da Silva Júnior","doi":"10.18472/SUSTDEB.V12N2.2021.34395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nIn general, the idea of Anthropocene refers to the set of socio-historical, ecological, economic, and technological transformations responsible for configuring a new stage of regulation and evolution of the planetary geological system. From its original proposition in the 2000s, this notion gained increasing repercussion, mobilizing different positions in multiple fields of scientific knowledge. This article aims to develop a critical analysis of some of the main concepts found in such debates, from the mobilization of three fundamental analytical categories: the concepts of Society, Nature, and Culture. In methodological terms, this is a literature review article based on qualitative and non-systematic bibliographic research. The analysis undertaken here indicates how the different approaches mobilized by the driving idea of Anthropocene result in theoretical movements that redefine the relationships between agency, structure, and social change in the historical context of modern industrial societies.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":146126,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability in Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability in Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18472/SUSTDEB.V12N2.2021.34395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In general, the idea of Anthropocene refers to the set of socio-historical, ecological, economic, and technological transformations responsible for configuring a new stage of regulation and evolution of the planetary geological system. From its original proposition in the 2000s, this notion gained increasing repercussion, mobilizing different positions in multiple fields of scientific knowledge. This article aims to develop a critical analysis of some of the main concepts found in such debates, from the mobilization of three fundamental analytical categories: the concepts of Society, Nature, and Culture. In methodological terms, this is a literature review article based on qualitative and non-systematic bibliographic research. The analysis undertaken here indicates how the different approaches mobilized by the driving idea of Anthropocene result in theoretical movements that redefine the relationships between agency, structure, and social change in the historical context of modern industrial societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分类争议和科学争议:人类世的社会、自然和文化
总的来说,人类世的概念是指一系列社会历史、生态、经济和技术变革,这些变革负责配置行星地质系统的调节和演化的新阶段。从2000年代的最初命题开始,这一概念得到了越来越多的反响,在多个科学知识领域调动了不同的立场。本文旨在从三个基本分析类别:社会、自然和文化的概念出发,对这些辩论中的一些主要概念进行批判性分析。在方法学方面,这是一篇基于定性和非系统书目研究的文献综述文章。本文的分析表明,在人类世的驱动思想的推动下,不同的研究方法是如何导致理论运动的,这些理论运动重新定义了现代工业社会历史背景下机构、结构和社会变革之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparação dos padrões de qualidade do ar entre o Brasil e países dos cinco continentes Percepção dos impactos socioambientais causados por geradores eólicos no estado do Piauí, Nordeste do Brasil Energy communities of repair in remote infrastructures: a study of Puerto Edén in the Chilean Patagonia The socio-environmental aftermath of gold mining in the Amazon: the case of Yutzupino in Napo, Ecuador Condições institucionais para o desenvolvimento das comunidades energéticas no Chile e no Brasil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1