Comparison of Machine and Deep Learning Models for the Prediction of Land Degradation

Joshua Edwards, Gülüstan Dogan, N. Pricope
{"title":"Comparison of Machine and Deep Learning Models for the Prediction of Land Degradation","authors":"Joshua Edwards, Gülüstan Dogan, N. Pricope","doi":"10.1109/ICICT58900.2023.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary purpose of this study was to develop and compare artificial intelligence algorithms to determine which gives the best predictions on variables related to land degradation. Data for this project was taken from satellite imagery and readings from ground stations. Data used included precipitation, temperature, and ground cover (EVI) readings. After comparing both the machine and deep learning methods it was found that overall machine learning vastly outperformed the deep learning models. In the end, random forest was the most accurate with a mean absolute percent error of 10.52%, and the top three models were all based on decision trees.","PeriodicalId":425057,"journal":{"name":"2023 6th International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 6th International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT58900.2023.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to develop and compare artificial intelligence algorithms to determine which gives the best predictions on variables related to land degradation. Data for this project was taken from satellite imagery and readings from ground stations. Data used included precipitation, temperature, and ground cover (EVI) readings. After comparing both the machine and deep learning methods it was found that overall machine learning vastly outperformed the deep learning models. In the end, random forest was the most accurate with a mean absolute percent error of 10.52%, and the top three models were all based on decision trees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器和深度学习模型在土地退化预测中的比较
本研究的主要目的是开发和比较人工智能算法,以确定哪种算法对与土地退化相关的变量给出了最好的预测。该项目的数据来自卫星图像和地面站的读数。使用的数据包括降水、温度和地面覆盖(EVI)读数。在比较了机器学习和深度学习方法之后,我们发现机器学习的整体表现大大优于深度学习模型。最终,随机森林模型的准确率最高,平均绝对误差为10.52%,前三名模型均基于决策树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lung Cancer Classification and Prediction of Disease Severity Score Using Deep Learning Design Methodology for Single-Channel CNN-Based FER Systems Blockchain-based Certificate Management with Multi-Party Authentication A Content-Based Dataset Recommendation System for Biomedical Datasets Rainfall Forecasting with Variational Autoencoders and LSTMs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1