Air traffic functions in the NextGen and SESAR airspace

Alvin Sipe, John Moore
{"title":"Air traffic functions in the NextGen and SESAR airspace","authors":"Alvin Sipe, John Moore","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2009.5347554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The air traffic system enabled by NextGen and SESAR will allow functions to be executed by the most appropriate element given the strategic and tactical situation rather than limited to the existing roles predicated on 1960's technology and procedures. The current allocation of functions is based on historical technical limitations. To ensure the most efficient air traffic system (in terms of throughput, safety, environmental impact, etc.), the functions need to be assessed for their best allocation to prevent over-optimizing one area of the system at the expense of other areas. The information-based, shared situational awareness, and collaborative decision making paradigm enables the redistribution of functions both strategically and tactically. The functions may also be distributed differently for different stakeholders. The method for establishing which element has the tools and information needed to execute these functions is defined in the systems engineering process. The systems engineering process entails developing and evaluating alternative functional allocations based on the system requirements. The most advantageous functional allocation is determined through a requirements-based and benefits-based selection process. This process develops trades of the alternatives, lists the pros and cons, and then selects the best alternative. This is important because “best” can be different for varying scenarios and elements. The major elements, or actors, in the air traffic system are the airplane, ATC, and AOC. These are composed of sub-elements themselves and require assessment of the allocation of functions by management time horizon. The proposed management time horizons are capacity, flow, traffic, separation, and collision avoidance. Once functions have been allocated, simulations (fast-time and human-in-the-loop) and field trials can be used to develop and validate performance requirements for those functions. Finally an example of the possible re-allocation of one of the functions of the Air Transportation system is discussed along with the benefits of this alternate allocation.","PeriodicalId":313168,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2009.5347554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The air traffic system enabled by NextGen and SESAR will allow functions to be executed by the most appropriate element given the strategic and tactical situation rather than limited to the existing roles predicated on 1960's technology and procedures. The current allocation of functions is based on historical technical limitations. To ensure the most efficient air traffic system (in terms of throughput, safety, environmental impact, etc.), the functions need to be assessed for their best allocation to prevent over-optimizing one area of the system at the expense of other areas. The information-based, shared situational awareness, and collaborative decision making paradigm enables the redistribution of functions both strategically and tactically. The functions may also be distributed differently for different stakeholders. The method for establishing which element has the tools and information needed to execute these functions is defined in the systems engineering process. The systems engineering process entails developing and evaluating alternative functional allocations based on the system requirements. The most advantageous functional allocation is determined through a requirements-based and benefits-based selection process. This process develops trades of the alternatives, lists the pros and cons, and then selects the best alternative. This is important because “best” can be different for varying scenarios and elements. The major elements, or actors, in the air traffic system are the airplane, ATC, and AOC. These are composed of sub-elements themselves and require assessment of the allocation of functions by management time horizon. The proposed management time horizons are capacity, flow, traffic, separation, and collision avoidance. Once functions have been allocated, simulations (fast-time and human-in-the-loop) and field trials can be used to develop and validate performance requirements for those functions. Finally an example of the possible re-allocation of one of the functions of the Air Transportation system is discussed along with the benefits of this alternate allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NextGen和SESAR空域的空中交通功能
由NextGen和SESAR实现的空中交通系统将允许在战略和战术情况下由最合适的元素执行功能,而不是局限于基于20世纪60年代技术和程序的现有角色。当前的功能分配是基于历史的技术限制。为确保航空交通系统(在吞吐量、安全、环境影响等方面)最具效率,我们需要评估各功能的最佳分配,以防止系统某一方面的过度优化而损害其他方面。基于信息的、共享的态势感知和协作决策范式使战略和战术功能的重新分配成为可能。对于不同的涉众,这些功能的分布也可能不同。确定哪个元素拥有执行这些功能所需的工具和信息的方法是在系统工程过程中定义的。系统工程过程需要开发和评估基于系统需求的可选功能分配。最有利的功能分配是通过基于需求和基于利益的选择过程确定的。这个过程开发了各种替代方案的交易,列出利弊,然后选择最佳替代方案。这一点很重要,因为“最佳”对于不同的场景和元素可能是不同的。空中交通系统中的主要元素或角色是飞机、ATC和AOC。它们由子要素本身组成,需要按管理时间范围评估职能的分配。建议的管理时间范围是容量、流量、交通、分离和避免碰撞。一旦分配了功能,就可以使用模拟(快速和人在循环)和现场试验来开发和验证这些功能的性能要求。最后,讨论了一个可能重新分配航空运输系统功能之一的例子,以及这种替代分配的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges in updating military safety-critical hardware Simplified dynamic density: A metric for dynamic airspace configuration and NextGen analysis Analysis of divergences from area navigation departure routes at DFW airport Analysis of advanced flight management systems (FMS), flight management computer (FMC) field observations, trials; lateral and vertical path integration Trajectory prediction credibility concept
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1