Il paradosso del mentitore

Alessandro Di Caro
{"title":"Il paradosso del mentitore","authors":"Alessandro Di Caro","doi":"10.7358/ling-2021-002-dica","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The liar paradox is an ancient logical paradox (revisited by modern thinkers) which links truth with falsehood and falsehood with truth, and is based on a self-referential mechanism. It has been discussed by a variety of authors, from Aristotle to Bateson. The solution to that paradox, however, can be found by having recourse to Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy, and by, so to speak, getting out of language (because true and false are words which belong to our language) to attain reality. This can be expressed through Wittgenstein’s idea that no proposition can say of itself whether it is true or false. However, experience is also expressible in words – and one can think of propositions which cannot be confirmed or disproved according to experience. Studying the paradox, therefore, leads one to Gödel’s theorem which offers a mathematical demonstration of the existence of undecidable propositions.","PeriodicalId":302041,"journal":{"name":"Linguæ & - Rivista di lingue e culture moderne","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguæ & - Rivista di lingue e culture moderne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ling-2021-002-dica","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The liar paradox is an ancient logical paradox (revisited by modern thinkers) which links truth with falsehood and falsehood with truth, and is based on a self-referential mechanism. It has been discussed by a variety of authors, from Aristotle to Bateson. The solution to that paradox, however, can be found by having recourse to Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy, and by, so to speak, getting out of language (because true and false are words which belong to our language) to attain reality. This can be expressed through Wittgenstein’s idea that no proposition can say of itself whether it is true or false. However, experience is also expressible in words – and one can think of propositions which cannot be confirmed or disproved according to experience. Studying the paradox, therefore, leads one to Gödel’s theorem which offers a mathematical demonstration of the existence of undecidable propositions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骗子悖论
说谎者悖论是一个古老的逻辑悖论(被现代思想家重新审视),它将真与假、假与真联系起来,并基于一种自我指涉机制。从亚里士多德到贝特森,许多作家都讨论过这个问题。然而,这个悖论的解决方案可以通过求助于路德维希·维特根斯坦的哲学来找到,可以说,通过走出语言(因为真和假都是属于我们语言的词)来获得现实。这可以通过维特根斯坦的观点来表达,即没有命题能说自己是真还是假。然而,经验也是可以用语言表达的——人们可以想到那些不能根据经验证实或证伪的命题。因此,研究这个悖论,我们就会得到Gödel定理,它从数学上证明了不可判定命题的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dirk ex Machina: Douglas Adams’ Saga and Holistic Detection as Religious Satire Lies from Outer Space: The Martians’ Famous Invasion of New Jersey “An Infinite and Endless Liar”: Paroles as a Case Study of the Pragmatics of Lying in Shakespeare Introduction: On Lying Tra virtuosismo e truffa: l’arte del falsario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1