Microbiological spectrum of acute and chronic dacrocystitis in Malwa region

A. Verma, Mayank Gupta, Junior Resident
{"title":"Microbiological spectrum of acute and chronic dacrocystitis in Malwa region","authors":"A. Verma, Mayank Gupta, Junior Resident","doi":"10.17511/jooo.2019.i04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction– The aim of this study is to report the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of acute and chronic dacryocystitis. This was a prospective study done at Sri Aurobindo medical college and PG institute in 61 cases of dacryocystitis from October 2017 to April 2019. Materials and Method- After proper clinical examination patients were diagnosed with dacryocystitis. On presence of pus filled sac patients were categorised as acute dacryocystitis, chronic dacryocystitis patients were diagnosed after ROPLAS test and lacrimal syringing These cases were reviewed for microbiological and demographic profile. Culture results with the organisms isolated were then recorded. Under aseptic precautions, cleaning the surrounding area, specimens for microbiological analysis were obtained by sterile cotton swab from the lacrimal sac, by applying pressure over the lacrimal sac area and allowing purulent material to reflux through the lacrimal puncta. All the specimens were sent to institute’s microbiology department for analysis. Results– 61 patients were evaluated out of which 24 were acute onset and 37 had chronic onset. Female male ratio was 1.68. Mean age of presentation was 52 yrs. Gram positive organisms were the most commonly isolated accounting for 74% and the commonest species isolated was S. aureus in 76 %. Percentage of gram-positive cultures was higher in chronic dacryocystitis than acute ones. Also, in culture positive acute dacryocystitis, gram negative species were found in only 17% of cases. Conclusion– Gram positive bacteria is commonest cause of dacryocystitis however gram negative bacterias were found to be more virulent. The result of this study had significant bearing on patients with dacryocystitis and also helpful when mass cataract surgeries were being performed. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...","PeriodicalId":112259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/jooo.2019.i04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction– The aim of this study is to report the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of acute and chronic dacryocystitis. This was a prospective study done at Sri Aurobindo medical college and PG institute in 61 cases of dacryocystitis from October 2017 to April 2019. Materials and Method- After proper clinical examination patients were diagnosed with dacryocystitis. On presence of pus filled sac patients were categorised as acute dacryocystitis, chronic dacryocystitis patients were diagnosed after ROPLAS test and lacrimal syringing These cases were reviewed for microbiological and demographic profile. Culture results with the organisms isolated were then recorded. Under aseptic precautions, cleaning the surrounding area, specimens for microbiological analysis were obtained by sterile cotton swab from the lacrimal sac, by applying pressure over the lacrimal sac area and allowing purulent material to reflux through the lacrimal puncta. All the specimens were sent to institute’s microbiology department for analysis. Results– 61 patients were evaluated out of which 24 were acute onset and 37 had chronic onset. Female male ratio was 1.68. Mean age of presentation was 52 yrs. Gram positive organisms were the most commonly isolated accounting for 74% and the commonest species isolated was S. aureus in 76 %. Percentage of gram-positive cultures was higher in chronic dacryocystitis than acute ones. Also, in culture positive acute dacryocystitis, gram negative species were found in only 17% of cases. Conclusion– Gram positive bacteria is commonest cause of dacryocystitis however gram negative bacterias were found to be more virulent. The result of this study had significant bearing on patients with dacryocystitis and also helpful when mass cataract surgeries were being performed. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尔瓦地区急慢性膀胱炎的微生物谱
本研究的目的是报道急性和慢性泪囊炎的微生物谱和抗生素敏感性。这是一项前瞻性研究,在2017年10月至2019年4月期间,在室利阿罗宾多医学院和PG研究所对61例泪囊炎患者进行了研究。材料与方法:经临床检查,诊断为泪囊炎。对存在脓囊的患者分类为急性泪囊炎,慢性泪囊炎患者经ROPLAS检测和泪道冲洗后诊断。然后记录与分离的生物体的培养结果。在无菌注意事项下,清洁周围区域,用无菌棉签从泪囊中提取微生物标本,在泪囊区域加压,让化脓性物质通过泪点反流。所有标本均送研究所微生物科分析。结果:61例患者被评估,其中24例为急性发作,37例为慢性发作。男女比例为1.68。平均发病年龄52岁。革兰氏阳性菌最常见,占74%,最常见的是金黄色葡萄球菌,占76%。慢性泪囊炎的革兰氏阳性培养比例高于急性泪囊炎。在培养阳性的急性泪囊炎中,革兰氏阴性菌种仅占17%。结论:革兰氏阳性菌是泪囊炎最常见的病因,而革兰氏阴性菌毒性更强。本研究结果对泪囊炎患者有重要意义,对大规模白内障手术也有帮助。...................................................................................................................................................
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective study to analyse the ocular morbidity in the slum-dwelling population of central India. Sleep-disordered breathing a neglected risk factor in primary open-angle glaucoma Effect of donor and host factors on corneal graft transparency Clinical patterns of Uveitis in a Regional Eye Institute of North India Comparison of conjunctival free autograft and Rotational flap technique in primary pterygium surgery: Visual changes and safety profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1