The Transitional Costs of Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence from the Clean Air Act and the Workforce

Reed Walker
{"title":"The Transitional Costs of Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence from the Clean Air Act and the Workforce","authors":"Reed Walker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New environmental regulations lead to a rearrangement of production away from polluting industries, and workers in those industries are adversely affected. This paper uses linked worker-firm data in the United States to estimate the transitional costs associated with reallocating workers from newly regulated industries to other sectors of the economy. The focus on workers rather than industries as the unit of analysis allows me to examine previously unobserved economic outcomes such as non-employment and long run earnings losses from job transitions, both of which are critical to understanding the reallocative costs associated with these policies. Using panel variation induced by the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), I find that the reallocative costs of environmental policy are significant. Workers in newly regulated plants experienced, in aggregate, more than $9 billion inforegone earnings for the years after the change in policy. Most of these costs are driven by non-employment and lower earnings in future employment, while earnings of workers who remain with their firm change little. Relative to the estimated benefits of the 1990 CAAA, these one-time transitional costs are small. However, the estimated costs far exceed the workforce compensation policies designed to mitigate some of these earnings losses.","PeriodicalId":378017,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Environment (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"327","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Environment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 327

Abstract

New environmental regulations lead to a rearrangement of production away from polluting industries, and workers in those industries are adversely affected. This paper uses linked worker-firm data in the United States to estimate the transitional costs associated with reallocating workers from newly regulated industries to other sectors of the economy. The focus on workers rather than industries as the unit of analysis allows me to examine previously unobserved economic outcomes such as non-employment and long run earnings losses from job transitions, both of which are critical to understanding the reallocative costs associated with these policies. Using panel variation induced by the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), I find that the reallocative costs of environmental policy are significant. Workers in newly regulated plants experienced, in aggregate, more than $9 billion inforegone earnings for the years after the change in policy. Most of these costs are driven by non-employment and lower earnings in future employment, while earnings of workers who remain with their firm change little. Relative to the estimated benefits of the 1990 CAAA, these one-time transitional costs are small. However, the estimated costs far exceed the workforce compensation policies designed to mitigate some of these earnings losses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部门再分配的过渡成本:来自清洁空气法案和劳动力的证据
新的环境条例导致生产重新安排,远离污染工业,这些工业的工人受到不利影响。本文使用美国的工人-企业关联数据来估计将工人从新监管的行业重新分配到其他经济部门的过渡成本。将重点放在工人而不是行业上作为分析单元,使我能够检查以前未观察到的经济结果,如失业和工作转换造成的长期收入损失,这两者对于理解与这些政策相关的再分配成本至关重要。利用1990年《清洁空气法修正案》(CAAA)引起的面板变化,我发现环境政策的再配置成本是显著的。在政策改变后的几年里,新监管工厂的工人总共损失了超过90亿美元的收入。这些成本大部分是由失业和未来就业收入较低造成的,而留在公司的工人的收入变化不大。与1990年CAAA的估计收益相比,这些一次性过渡成本很小。然而,估计的成本远远超过了旨在减轻这些收入损失的劳动力补偿政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Investor-State Dispute Settlement Cases Influence Domestic Environmental Regulation? The Role of Respondent State Capacity The Ongoing Re-Centralization Trends in Environmental Policy in China: The Case of Green Finance Policy On the Effects of Linking Voluntary Cap-and-Trade Systems for Co2 Emissions EPA Regulation and Relative Food Cost International Transmission of the Business Cycle and Environmental Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1