Scaling Crowd+AI Sidewalk Accessibility Assessments: Initial Experiments Examining Label Quality and Cross-city Training on Performance

Michael Duan, Jon E. Froehlich
{"title":"Scaling Crowd+AI Sidewalk Accessibility Assessments: Initial Experiments Examining Label Quality and Cross-city Training on Performance","authors":"Michael Duan, Jon E. Froehlich","doi":"10.1145/3517428.3550381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, crowds plus machine learning techniques are being used to semi-automatically analyze the accessibility of built environments; however, open questions remain about how to effectively combine the two. We present two experiments examining the effect of crowdsourced data in automatically classifying sidewalk accessibility features in streetscape images. In Experiment 1, we investigate the effect of validated data—which has been voted correct by the crowd but is more expensive to collect—compared with a larger but noisier aggregate dataset. In Experiment 2, we examine whether crowdsourced labeled data gathered in one city can be used as effective training data for another. Together, these experiments contribute to the growing literature in Crowd+AI approaches for semi-automatic sidewalk assessment and help identify pertinent challenges.","PeriodicalId":384752,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Increasingly, crowds plus machine learning techniques are being used to semi-automatically analyze the accessibility of built environments; however, open questions remain about how to effectively combine the two. We present two experiments examining the effect of crowdsourced data in automatically classifying sidewalk accessibility features in streetscape images. In Experiment 1, we investigate the effect of validated data—which has been voted correct by the crowd but is more expensive to collect—compared with a larger but noisier aggregate dataset. In Experiment 2, we examine whether crowdsourced labeled data gathered in one city can be used as effective training data for another. Together, these experiments contribute to the growing literature in Crowd+AI approaches for semi-automatic sidewalk assessment and help identify pertinent challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩放人群+人工智能人行道可达性评估:检查标签质量和跨城市性能培训的初步实验
越来越多的人群和机器学习技术被用于半自动分析建筑环境的可访问性;然而,如何有效地将两者结合起来仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。我们提出了两个实验来检验众包数据在街道景观图像中自动分类人行道可达性特征的效果。在实验1中,我们研究了与更大但更嘈杂的聚合数据集相比,经过验证的数据(已被人群投票为正确,但收集成本更高)的效果。在实验2中,我们检验了在一个城市收集的众包标签数据是否可以作为另一个城市的有效训练数据。总之,这些实验有助于增加用于半自动人行道评估的Crowd+AI方法的文献,并有助于识别相关挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing with and for People with Intellectual Disabilities Investigating Sign Language Interpreter Rendering and Guiding Methods in Virtual Reality 360-Degree Content ”I Should Feel Like I’m In Control”: Understanding Expectations, Concerns, and Motivations for the Use of Autonomous Navigation on Wheelchairs It's Enactment Time!: High-fidelity Enactment Stage for Accessible Automated Driving System Technology Research Inter-rater Reliability of Command-Line Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1