A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study to Compare, Intraoperative Ventilatory Parameters, Insertion Success Rate & Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of Three Airway Devices the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube, the EasyTube and the Laryngeal Tube-S

A. Chauhan, H. Bhatt, Shailesh Lohani
{"title":"A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study to Compare, Intraoperative Ventilatory Parameters, Insertion Success Rate & Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of Three Airway Devices the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube, the EasyTube and the Laryngeal Tube-S","authors":"A. Chauhan, H. Bhatt, Shailesh Lohani","doi":"10.21276/ajmr.2019.8.4.an1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Securing and managing the airway is quintessential and perhaps the most critical aspect in practice of anaesthesiology. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Combitube, EasyTube and the Laryngeal tube suction, when placed in their conventional positions, for general anaesthesia during elective non-laparoscopic surgeries using controlled ventilation. Subjects and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study done on 90 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled into the study and were randomly allocated to the following three groups using computer generated random table. Group ETC (n=30): Patients whose airway was managed using Esophageal tracheal combitube, Group EzT (n=30): Patients whose airway was managed using Easy Tube and Group LTS (n=30): Patients whose airway was managed using Laryngeal tube suction. The time taken to insert the device was recorded in each instance in all the groups. For comparison of qualitative data, Chi square test was used. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons. P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: When compared, use of Combitube, EasyTube and Laryngeal Tube Suction was associated with statistically similar intraoperative airway pressures, dynamic compliance, airway resistance, SpO2, and EtCO2 (p>0.05). Combitube and EasyTube resulted in significantly higher incidence of mucosal trauma detected by presence of blood on the device after its removal and an insignificant increase in incidence of postoperative sore throat (p>0.05). Combitube placement resulted in significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia as compared to easy tube and laryngeal tube suction(p<0.05). But the nature of all these complaints was mild and no active intervention was required in any case. Conclusion: We concluded that based on our observations, if and when Combitube, EasyTube or Laryngeal Tube Suction is used for emergency airway management, it can be continued for conduct of general anaesthesia in surgeries of moderate duration.","PeriodicalId":407051,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ajmr.2019.8.4.an1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Securing and managing the airway is quintessential and perhaps the most critical aspect in practice of anaesthesiology. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Combitube, EasyTube and the Laryngeal tube suction, when placed in their conventional positions, for general anaesthesia during elective non-laparoscopic surgeries using controlled ventilation. Subjects and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study done on 90 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled into the study and were randomly allocated to the following three groups using computer generated random table. Group ETC (n=30): Patients whose airway was managed using Esophageal tracheal combitube, Group EzT (n=30): Patients whose airway was managed using Easy Tube and Group LTS (n=30): Patients whose airway was managed using Laryngeal tube suction. The time taken to insert the device was recorded in each instance in all the groups. For comparison of qualitative data, Chi square test was used. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons. P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: When compared, use of Combitube, EasyTube and Laryngeal Tube Suction was associated with statistically similar intraoperative airway pressures, dynamic compliance, airway resistance, SpO2, and EtCO2 (p>0.05). Combitube and EasyTube resulted in significantly higher incidence of mucosal trauma detected by presence of blood on the device after its removal and an insignificant increase in incidence of postoperative sore throat (p>0.05). Combitube placement resulted in significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia as compared to easy tube and laryngeal tube suction(p<0.05). But the nature of all these complaints was mild and no active intervention was required in any case. Conclusion: We concluded that based on our observations, if and when Combitube, EasyTube or Laryngeal Tube Suction is used for emergency airway management, it can be continued for conduct of general anaesthesia in surgeries of moderate duration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管-气管导管、EasyTube及喉管- s三种气道装置术中通气参数、置入成功率及口咽漏压比较的前瞻性随机对照研究
背景:保护和管理气道是麻醉学实践中最重要的方面。本研究旨在评估和比较Combitube、EasyTube和喉管吸引在常规位置放置时在选择性非腹腔镜手术中使用控制通气进行全身麻醉的效果。对象与方法:对90例择期全麻手术患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究,采用计算机生成的随机表随机分为以下三组。ETC组(n=30):采用食管气管导管管理气道的患者;EzT组(n=30):采用Easy Tube管理气道的患者;LTS组(n=30):采用喉管吸引管理气道的患者。记录各组每次插入设备所需的时间。定性资料比较采用卡方检验。多重比较采用Bonferroni校正。P值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:比较Combitube、EasyTube和喉管吸入的使用,术中气道压力、动态顺应性、气道阻力、SpO2和EtCO2的相关差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。Combitube和EasyTube两组取下器械后,有血检出的粘膜损伤发生率明显增高,术后喉咙痛发生率无明显增高(p < 0.05)。气管插管术后吞咽困难发生率明显高于气管插管和喉管吸入(p<0.05)。但所有这些抱怨的性质都是温和的,在任何情况下都不需要积极干预。结论:根据我们的观察,在急诊气道管理中使用Combitube、EasyTube或喉管吸入时,可以在中等持续时间的手术中继续进行全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome of Pregnancies with Fibroids and its Associated Complications: A Prospective Study Floor Level Activity as a Sign of Congruency and Containment in Perthes’ Disease Osteoid Osteoma of Cuboid Bone- A Rare Cause of Chronic Foot Pain in Childhood –A Case Report Evaluation of Clinical Profile of Bipolar and Unipolar Depression Patients- A Clinical Study Study of Influence of Vaginal Ph on the efficacy of Dinoprostone gel for Induction of Labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1