Influence of triple-well technology on laser fault injection and laser sensor efficiency

N. Borrel, C. Champeix, E. Kussener, W. Rahajandraibe, M. Lisart, A. Sarafianos, J. Dutertre
{"title":"Influence of triple-well technology on laser fault injection and laser sensor efficiency","authors":"N. Borrel, C. Champeix, E. Kussener, W. Rahajandraibe, M. Lisart, A. Sarafianos, J. Dutertre","doi":"10.1109/DFT.2015.7315141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is driven by the need to understand the influence of a Deep-Nwell implant on the sensitivity of integrated circuits to laser-induced fault injections. CMOS technologies can be either dual-well or triple-well. Triple-well technology has several advantages compared to dual-well technology in terms of electrical performances. Single-event responses have been widely studied in dual-well whereas SEE (single event effects) in triple-well is not well understood. This paper presents a comparative analysis of soft error rate and countermeasures sensors with for these two techniques in 40 nm and 90 nm CMOS technology. First, laser fault injection on registers were investigated, showing that triple-well technology is more vulnerable. Similarly, we studied the efficiency of Bulk Built-In Current Sensors (BBICS) in detecting laser induced fault injection attempts for both techniques. This sensor was found less effective in triple-well. Finally, a new BBICS compliant with body-biasing adjustments is proposed in order to improve its detection efficiency.","PeriodicalId":383972,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFTS)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFT.2015.7315141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study is driven by the need to understand the influence of a Deep-Nwell implant on the sensitivity of integrated circuits to laser-induced fault injections. CMOS technologies can be either dual-well or triple-well. Triple-well technology has several advantages compared to dual-well technology in terms of electrical performances. Single-event responses have been widely studied in dual-well whereas SEE (single event effects) in triple-well is not well understood. This paper presents a comparative analysis of soft error rate and countermeasures sensors with for these two techniques in 40 nm and 90 nm CMOS technology. First, laser fault injection on registers were investigated, showing that triple-well technology is more vulnerable. Similarly, we studied the efficiency of Bulk Built-In Current Sensors (BBICS) in detecting laser induced fault injection attempts for both techniques. This sensor was found less effective in triple-well. Finally, a new BBICS compliant with body-biasing adjustments is proposed in order to improve its detection efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三井技术对激光断层注入和激光传感器效率的影响
这项研究是由于需要了解Deep-Nwell植入物对集成电路对激光诱导故障注入的灵敏度的影响。CMOS技术可以是双井或三井。与双井技术相比,三井技术在电气性能方面具有几个优势。双井中的单事件响应已经得到了广泛的研究,而三井中的单事件效应尚未得到很好的理解。本文对这两种技术在40 nm和90 nm CMOS工艺下的软误差率和对抗传感器进行了比较分析。首先,对寄存器上的激光故障注入进行了研究,表明三井技术更容易受到攻击。同样地,我们研究了两种技术的大块内置电流传感器(BBICS)在检测激光诱导故障注入尝试方面的效率。这种传感器在三井中效果较差。最后,为了提高检测效率,提出了一种适应身体偏置调整的BBICS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Software-based on-chip thermal sensor calibration for DVFS-enabled many-core systems REPAIR: Hard-error recovery via re-execution Compacting output responses containing unknowns using an embedded processor Fault detection and repair of DSC arrays through memristor sensing Security analysis of logic encryption against the most effective side-channel attack: DPA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1