Improving Model Inspection with Crowdsourcing

D. Winkler, M. Sabou, S. Petrovic, Gisele Carneiro, Marcos Kalinowski, S. Biffl
{"title":"Improving Model Inspection with Crowdsourcing","authors":"D. Winkler, M. Sabou, S. Petrovic, Gisele Carneiro, Marcos Kalinowski, S. Biffl","doi":"10.1109/CSI-SE.2017.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional Software Inspection is a well-established approach to identify defects in software artifacts and models early and efficiently. However, insufficient method and tool support hinder efficient defect detection in large software models. Recent Human Computation and Crowdsourcing processes may help to overcome this limitation by splitting complex inspection artifacts into smaller parts including a better control over defect detection tasks and increasing the scalability of inspection tasks. Therefore, we introduce a Crowdsourcing-Based Inspection (CSI) process with tool support with focus on inspection teams and the quality of defect detection. We evaluate the CSI process in a feasibility study involving 63 inspectors using the CSI process and 12 inspectors using a traditional best-practice inspection process. The CSI process was found useful by the participants. Although the preliminary results of the study were promising, the CSI process should be further investigated with typical large software engineering models.","PeriodicalId":431605,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSI-SE.2017.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Traditional Software Inspection is a well-established approach to identify defects in software artifacts and models early and efficiently. However, insufficient method and tool support hinder efficient defect detection in large software models. Recent Human Computation and Crowdsourcing processes may help to overcome this limitation by splitting complex inspection artifacts into smaller parts including a better control over defect detection tasks and increasing the scalability of inspection tasks. Therefore, we introduce a Crowdsourcing-Based Inspection (CSI) process with tool support with focus on inspection teams and the quality of defect detection. We evaluate the CSI process in a feasibility study involving 63 inspectors using the CSI process and 12 inspectors using a traditional best-practice inspection process. The CSI process was found useful by the participants. Although the preliminary results of the study were promising, the CSI process should be further investigated with typical large software engineering models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用众包改进模型检验
传统的软件检查是一种行之有效的方法,可以早期有效地识别软件工件和模型中的缺陷。然而,在大型软件模型中,方法和工具支持的不足阻碍了有效的缺陷检测。最近的人工计算和众包过程可以通过将复杂的检查工件分解成更小的部分来帮助克服这一限制,包括更好地控制缺陷检测任务和增加检查任务的可扩展性。因此,我们引入了一个基于工具支持的基于众包的检查(CSI)过程,重点关注检查团队和缺陷检测的质量。我们在一项可行性研究中评估了CSI流程,其中63名检查员使用CSI流程,12名检查员使用传统的最佳实践检查流程。参与者认为CSI过程是有用的。虽然研究的初步结果是有希望的,CSI过程应该进一步研究典型的大型软件工程模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: An Onboard Journey in Software Crowdsourcing Competitive Model Preliminary Findings on Software Engineering Practices in Civic Hackathons Improving Model Inspection with Crowdsourcing Prioritizing User Feedback from Twitter: A Survey Report Crowd-Based Programming for Reactive Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1