Theorizing transformative innovations: the role of agency in real critical junctures

Lilja Mósesdóttir, Í. Jónsson
{"title":"Theorizing transformative innovations: the role of agency in real critical junctures","authors":"Lilja Mósesdóttir, Í. Jónsson","doi":"10.4337/9781789902587.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Schwab (2015), the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) is already underway. It was triggered by the fusion of the new technologies blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological worlds, that generates transformation not only of production and management but also of governance. New forms of collaboration will have to be developed to make use of the opportunities created by the fusion of new technologies across the economic and social spheres. Governments and regulatory agencies need to collaborate closely with business and civil society. The governance required is the one preserving the interest of the consumers and the public at large while continuing to support innovation and technological development. We would like to argue that a move from producer-orientated innovation systems to systems of transformative innovation plays a crucial role in the 4IR involving the development of future alternatives. A shift towards transformative innovation systems requires innovation policy to take into account the interests of a larger number of stakeholders than before and to engage users and end-consumers in policy formation processes. Moreover, climate change, demographic shift and technological development are posing a threat to socio-economic and environmental sustainability such that there is a need for new ways of determining (broadening the scope of) the objectives of innovation and technical change. Hence, innovation policy will need to be mission-orientated (Mazzucato 2018), giving direction to economic growth and innovation in order to tackle societal and technological challenges. It is a huge challenge to build successful collaboration around systems of transformative innovation as it involves a much larger number of actors than in the producer-orientated innovation system. At the same time digital technology has made it easier to integrate","PeriodicalId":107088,"journal":{"name":"Diversity, Innovation and Clusters","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity, Innovation and Clusters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902587.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Schwab (2015), the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) is already underway. It was triggered by the fusion of the new technologies blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological worlds, that generates transformation not only of production and management but also of governance. New forms of collaboration will have to be developed to make use of the opportunities created by the fusion of new technologies across the economic and social spheres. Governments and regulatory agencies need to collaborate closely with business and civil society. The governance required is the one preserving the interest of the consumers and the public at large while continuing to support innovation and technological development. We would like to argue that a move from producer-orientated innovation systems to systems of transformative innovation plays a crucial role in the 4IR involving the development of future alternatives. A shift towards transformative innovation systems requires innovation policy to take into account the interests of a larger number of stakeholders than before and to engage users and end-consumers in policy formation processes. Moreover, climate change, demographic shift and technological development are posing a threat to socio-economic and environmental sustainability such that there is a need for new ways of determining (broadening the scope of) the objectives of innovation and technical change. Hence, innovation policy will need to be mission-orientated (Mazzucato 2018), giving direction to economic growth and innovation in order to tackle societal and technological challenges. It is a huge challenge to build successful collaboration around systems of transformative innovation as it involves a much larger number of actors than in the producer-orientated innovation system. At the same time digital technology has made it easier to integrate
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理论化变革创新:代理在现实关键时刻的作用
根据施瓦布(2015),第四次工业革命(4IR)已经开始。它是由新技术的融合引发的,这些新技术模糊了物理、数字和生物世界之间的界限,不仅产生了生产和管理的变革,也产生了治理的变革。必须发展新的合作形式,以利用经济和社会各领域的新技术融合所创造的机会。政府和监管机构需要与企业和民间社会密切合作。所需要的治理是在继续支持创新和技术发展的同时,维护消费者和广大公众的利益。我们认为,从以生产者为导向的创新体系向变革性创新体系的转变在第四次工业革命中起着至关重要的作用,涉及到未来替代方案的发展。向变革性创新系统的转变要求创新政策考虑到比以前更多的利益攸关方的利益,并让用户和最终消费者参与政策制定过程。此外,气候变化、人口变化和技术发展正在对社会经济和环境的可持续性构成威胁,因此需要有新的方法来确定(扩大范围)创新和技术变革的目标。因此,创新政策需要以任务为导向(Mazzucato 2018),为经济增长和创新指明方向,以应对社会和技术挑战。围绕变革性创新系统建立成功的合作是一项巨大的挑战,因为它涉及的参与者数量远远超过以生产者为导向的创新系统。与此同时,数字技术使整合变得更加容易
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theorizing transformative innovations: the role of agency in real critical junctures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1