Opportunity and Choice in Social Networks

P. Pin, S. Franz, M. Marsili
{"title":"Opportunity and Choice in Social Networks","authors":"P. Pin, S. Franz, M. Marsili","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1115748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our societies are heterogeneous in many dimensions such as census, education, religion, ethnic and cultural composition. The links between individuals - e.g. by friendship, marriage or collaboration - are not evenly distributed, but rather tend to be concentrated within the same group. This phenomenon, called imbreeding homophily, has been related to either (social) preference for links with own--type individuals ( choice-based homophily) or to the prevalence of individuals of her same type in the choice set of an individual ( opportunity-based homophily). We propose an indicator to distinguish between these effects for minority groups. This is based on the observation that, in environments with unbiased opportunities, as the relative size of the minority gets small, individuals of the minority rarely meet and have the chance to establish links together. Therefore the effect of choice--based homophily gets weaker and weaker as the size of the minority shrinks. We test this idea across the dimensions of race and education on data on US marriages, and across race on friendships in US schools, and find that: for what concerns education i) opportunity--based homophily is much stronger than choice--based homophily and ii) they are both remarkably stationary in time; concerning race iii) school friendships do not exhibit opportunity-based homophily, while marriages do, iv) choice-based homophily is much stronger for marriages than for friendships and v) these effects vary widely across race.","PeriodicalId":343564,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks","volume":"8 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1115748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Our societies are heterogeneous in many dimensions such as census, education, religion, ethnic and cultural composition. The links between individuals - e.g. by friendship, marriage or collaboration - are not evenly distributed, but rather tend to be concentrated within the same group. This phenomenon, called imbreeding homophily, has been related to either (social) preference for links with own--type individuals ( choice-based homophily) or to the prevalence of individuals of her same type in the choice set of an individual ( opportunity-based homophily). We propose an indicator to distinguish between these effects for minority groups. This is based on the observation that, in environments with unbiased opportunities, as the relative size of the minority gets small, individuals of the minority rarely meet and have the chance to establish links together. Therefore the effect of choice--based homophily gets weaker and weaker as the size of the minority shrinks. We test this idea across the dimensions of race and education on data on US marriages, and across race on friendships in US schools, and find that: for what concerns education i) opportunity--based homophily is much stronger than choice--based homophily and ii) they are both remarkably stationary in time; concerning race iii) school friendships do not exhibit opportunity-based homophily, while marriages do, iv) choice-based homophily is much stronger for marriages than for friendships and v) these effects vary widely across race.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交网络中的机会与选择
我们的社会在人口普查、教育、宗教、种族和文化构成等许多方面都是异质的。个体之间的联系——例如通过友谊、婚姻或合作——并不是均匀分布的,而是倾向于集中在同一群体中。这种现象被称为近亲繁殖同质性,与(社会)偏好与自己类型的个体联系(基于选择的同质性)或与她相同类型的个体在一个个体的选择集中的流行(基于机会的同质性)有关。我们提出了一个指标来区分这些对少数群体的影响。这是基于这样一种观察,即在具有无偏机会的环境中,随着少数群体的相对规模变小,少数群体中的个人很少见面,也很少有机会在一起建立联系。因此,随着少数群体规模的缩小,基于选择的同质性的影响会越来越弱。我们在种族和教育的维度上对美国婚姻数据进行了测试,在美国学校的友谊数据中对种族进行了测试,发现:就教育而言,i)基于机会的同质性比基于选择的同质性强得多,ii)它们在时间上都是非常稳定的;关于种族,3)学校友谊不会表现出基于机会的同质性,而婚姻则会;4)基于选择的同质性在婚姻中比在友谊中更强;5)这些影响在种族间差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recommended for You: The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales Concentration Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets Pricing Digital Goods: Discontinuous Costs and Shared Infrastructure Compatibility and Proprietary Standards: The Impact of Conversion Technologies in IT Markets with Network Effects Stuck in the Adoption Funnel: The Effect of Interruptions in the Adoption Process on Usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1