Overcoming Evidentiary Weaknesses in Reparation Claims Programmes

H. Niebergall
{"title":"Overcoming Evidentiary Weaknesses in Reparation Claims Programmes","authors":"H. Niebergall","doi":"10.1163/EJ.9789004174498.I-576.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter seeks to provide an overview and give concrete examples of how large-scale reparation programmes have administered the evidence in their decision-making processes, in particular the new techniques and approaches applied in order to overcome the lack of evidence in individual cases. There are two main challenges that large-scale reparation claims programmes face in the administration of evidence. These are the incomplete evidence submitted by individual claimants in support of their claim, and the vast amount of information that the programmes have to administer in total. In reparation claims programmes that address gross violations of human rights following a conflict or crisis, the lack of evidence in individual claims is very much linked with the circumstances leading to the losses and violations that were sustained and that are to be redressed through the programme. Keywords: decision-making process; documentary evidence; human rights; reparation claims programmes","PeriodicalId":399330,"journal":{"name":"Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004174498.I-576.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter seeks to provide an overview and give concrete examples of how large-scale reparation programmes have administered the evidence in their decision-making processes, in particular the new techniques and approaches applied in order to overcome the lack of evidence in individual cases. There are two main challenges that large-scale reparation claims programmes face in the administration of evidence. These are the incomplete evidence submitted by individual claimants in support of their claim, and the vast amount of information that the programmes have to administer in total. In reparation claims programmes that address gross violations of human rights following a conflict or crisis, the lack of evidence in individual claims is very much linked with the circumstances leading to the losses and violations that were sustained and that are to be redressed through the programme. Keywords: decision-making process; documentary evidence; human rights; reparation claims programmes
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服赔偿索赔方案中的证据缺陷
本章旨在概述大规模赔偿方案如何在其决策过程中管理证据,特别是为克服个别案件中缺乏证据而采用的新技术和方法,并给出具体例子。大规模赔偿索赔方案在证据管理方面面临两个主要挑战。这些是个别索赔人提出的支持其索赔的不完整证据,以及方案必须管理的全部大量资料。在处理冲突或危机后严重侵犯人权行为的赔偿索赔方案中,个别索赔缺乏证据与导致所遭受的损失和侵犯行为的情况密切相关,这些损失和侵犯行为将通过该方案加以纠正。关键词:决策过程;书面证据;人权;赔偿索偿方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Victims’ Rights to a Remedy and Reparation: the United Nations Principles and Guidelines The Claims Conference and the Historic Jewish Efforts for Holocaust-Related Compensation and Restitution Go Big or Go Home? Lessons Learned from the Colombian Victims’ Reparation System Gender and Reparations: Seeking Transformative Justice Overcoming Evidentiary Weaknesses in Reparation Claims Programmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1