Germany's Nuclear Phase-out: Sensitivities and Impacts on Electricity Prices and CO2 Emissions

B. Knopf, M. Pahle, H. Kondziella, F. Joas, O. Edenhofer, T. Bruckner
{"title":"Germany's Nuclear Phase-out: Sensitivities and Impacts on Electricity Prices and CO2 Emissions","authors":"B. Knopf, M. Pahle, H. Kondziella, F. Joas, O. Edenhofer, T. Bruckner","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.3.1.BKNO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the nuclear meltdown in Fukushima Daiichi, in summer 2011 the German parliament decided to phase-out nuclear power by 2022. When this decision was taken, a number of model-based analyses investigated the influence this decision would have on electricity prices and CO2 emissions. They concluded that CO2 emissions would be kept at levels that are in line with national reduction targets but that the phase-out would result in an increase in wholesale electricity prices. We show by means of a sensitivity analysis that results crucially hinge on some fundamental model assumptions. These particularly include the development of fossil fuel and CO2 prices, which have a much larger influence on the electricity price than the nuclear phase-out itself. Since the decision of the nuclear phase-out, CO2 prices have decreased and deployment of renewables increased ever since. This partly counteracts the negative effect of the nuclear phase-out on electricity prices, but on the other hand challenges the mitigation of CO2 emissions and security of supply. This underlines the importance of sensitivity analyses and suggests that policy-makers need to consider scenarios that analyze the whole range of possible future developments.","PeriodicalId":385400,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.3.1.BKNO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Following the nuclear meltdown in Fukushima Daiichi, in summer 2011 the German parliament decided to phase-out nuclear power by 2022. When this decision was taken, a number of model-based analyses investigated the influence this decision would have on electricity prices and CO2 emissions. They concluded that CO2 emissions would be kept at levels that are in line with national reduction targets but that the phase-out would result in an increase in wholesale electricity prices. We show by means of a sensitivity analysis that results crucially hinge on some fundamental model assumptions. These particularly include the development of fossil fuel and CO2 prices, which have a much larger influence on the electricity price than the nuclear phase-out itself. Since the decision of the nuclear phase-out, CO2 prices have decreased and deployment of renewables increased ever since. This partly counteracts the negative effect of the nuclear phase-out on electricity prices, but on the other hand challenges the mitigation of CO2 emissions and security of supply. This underlines the importance of sensitivity analyses and suggests that policy-makers need to consider scenarios that analyze the whole range of possible future developments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国逐步淘汰核能:对电价和二氧化碳排放的敏感性和影响
在福岛第一核电站(Fukushima Daiichi)发生核泄漏后,2011年夏天,德国议会决定在2022年之前逐步淘汰核电。当做出这一决定时,一些基于模型的分析调查了这一决定对电价和二氧化碳排放的影响。他们得出的结论是,二氧化碳排放量将保持在与国家减排目标一致的水平,但逐步淘汰将导致批发电价上涨。我们通过敏感性分析表明,结果关键取决于一些基本的模型假设。其中特别包括化石燃料和二氧化碳价格的发展,它们对电价的影响要比逐步淘汰核能本身大得多。自从决定逐步淘汰核能以来,二氧化碳的价格已经下降,可再生能源的部署也随之增加。这在一定程度上抵消了逐步淘汰核能对电价的负面影响,但另一方面对减少二氧化碳排放和供应安全提出了挑战。这强调了敏感性分析的重要性,并建议决策者需要考虑分析所有可能的未来发展的情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Transmission Expansion to Support Efficient Decarbonization of the Electricity Sector Modelling Net Zero and Sector Coupling: Lessons for European Policy Makers The Cost of Finance and the Cost of Carbon: A Case Study of Britain’s only PWR Biomethane for Electricity in Mexico: A Prospective Economic Analysis Aiming for Carbon Neutrality: Which Environmental Taxes Does Spain Need by 2030?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1