Different Paths to Democracy in the MENA Region: A Configurational Comparative Analysis

A. Alijla, Mohammad Mohammadzadeh Aghdam
{"title":"Different Paths to Democracy in the MENA Region: A Configurational Comparative Analysis","authors":"A. Alijla, Mohammad Mohammadzadeh Aghdam","doi":"10.4172/2332-0761.1000265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democratization is one of the main political challenges in the Middle East. The resistance to democracy and the prevail of non-democratic regimes, remain a fertile land for academics and professionals to examine it as it continues to be an unsolved puzzle. The purpose of this paper is to find out what factors and combinations of conditions explain the level of (non-) democratization in the MENA region. It examines whether there are different paths or specific factors that can influence the democratization process in the region. In order to examine the question a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method is used to find out the combinations of sufficient and necessary conditions for a particular outcome. The findings show that democratization is a multi-causal process. It shows that different factors (e.g. economic, societal, cultural diversity) have different impacts on the breakdown of democracy, democratic stability and democratic transition. QCA results highlight that the impact of various factors depends on their different combination within a country or groups of countries; showing that the Muslim population, oil export, regime type, political globalization, religious fractionalization and political parties as key factors in different configurations.","PeriodicalId":118558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Democratization is one of the main political challenges in the Middle East. The resistance to democracy and the prevail of non-democratic regimes, remain a fertile land for academics and professionals to examine it as it continues to be an unsolved puzzle. The purpose of this paper is to find out what factors and combinations of conditions explain the level of (non-) democratization in the MENA region. It examines whether there are different paths or specific factors that can influence the democratization process in the region. In order to examine the question a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method is used to find out the combinations of sufficient and necessary conditions for a particular outcome. The findings show that democratization is a multi-causal process. It shows that different factors (e.g. economic, societal, cultural diversity) have different impacts on the breakdown of democracy, democratic stability and democratic transition. QCA results highlight that the impact of various factors depends on their different combination within a country or groups of countries; showing that the Muslim population, oil export, regime type, political globalization, religious fractionalization and political parties as key factors in different configurations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中东和北非地区不同的民主道路:结构比较分析
民主化是中东面临的主要政治挑战之一。对民主的抵制和非民主政权的盛行,仍然是学者和专业人士研究的沃土,因为它仍然是一个未解之谜。本文的目的是找出哪些因素和条件组合解释了中东和北非地区的(非)民主化水平。它审查是否有不同的路径或具体因素可以影响该地区的民主化进程。为了检验这个问题,使用了定性比较分析(QCA)方法来找出特定结果的充分条件和必要条件的组合。研究结果表明,民主化是一个多因果过程。这表明不同的因素(如经济、社会、文化多样性)对民主的崩溃、民主的稳定和民主的过渡有不同的影响。QCA结果强调,各种因素的影响取决于它们在一个国家或国家集团内的不同组合;表明穆斯林人口、石油出口、政权类型、政治全球化、宗教派别化和政党是不同形态的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Religious Enlightenment in Mass Media (Experience of Uzbekistan) Sociopolitical Challenges of Afghan Society: Post 9/11 Scenario Creating New Regions in Ghana: Populist or Rational Pathway to Development? The Future is Uncertain for the Mono Party China-pluralized Africa Economic Relations: A Critical Analysis of Chinese Economic Strategies in Zambia and Tanzania The Road to Impeachment: Donald Trump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1