Putusan MK Nomor 86/PUU-X/2012 Dilihat dari Perspektif Fiqih Siyasah: Respon Politik Hukum Masyarakat Sipil melalui Judicial Review UU No. 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Zakat

Imron Hamzah
{"title":"Putusan MK Nomor 86/PUU-X/2012 Dilihat dari Perspektif Fiqih Siyasah: Respon Politik Hukum Masyarakat Sipil melalui Judicial Review UU No. 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Zakat","authors":"Imron Hamzah","doi":"10.24090/el-aqwal.v1i1.6781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the issuance of the Zakat Management Act No. 23 of 2011 as a part of which was intended to improve the previous Law (Law No. 38 of 1999) it still reaped contra from the community, especially private amil zakat institutions. Considering that the existing laws were deemed insufficient to accommodate the potential development of zakat in Indonesia, Commission VIII of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia formulated the new law on zakat management. However, since Law no. 38 of 1999, which previously had regulated the Management of Zakat, followed by a new law instead caused controversy among practitioners, academics, the public, the Amil Zakat Institution (LAZ) and other stakeholders. The fact that proves the existence of this controversy is the application for a judicial review to the Constitutional Court/MK. The applicants submitted a judicial review of several articles in the zakat management law based on four main points, namely the existence of criminalization, centralization, subordination, and marginalization. This effort is a legal political response and a manifestation of the role of the socio-political power of civil society in Indonesia, therefore this paper describes what and how the legal political efforts of civil society represented by several LAZ (Amil Zakat Institutions) respond through a legal effort called judicial review of Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management and proven successful with the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 86/ PUU-X/2012.","PeriodicalId":418937,"journal":{"name":"El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v1i1.6781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

After the issuance of the Zakat Management Act No. 23 of 2011 as a part of which was intended to improve the previous Law (Law No. 38 of 1999) it still reaped contra from the community, especially private amil zakat institutions. Considering that the existing laws were deemed insufficient to accommodate the potential development of zakat in Indonesia, Commission VIII of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia formulated the new law on zakat management. However, since Law no. 38 of 1999, which previously had regulated the Management of Zakat, followed by a new law instead caused controversy among practitioners, academics, the public, the Amil Zakat Institution (LAZ) and other stakeholders. The fact that proves the existence of this controversy is the application for a judicial review to the Constitutional Court/MK. The applicants submitted a judicial review of several articles in the zakat management law based on four main points, namely the existence of criminalization, centralization, subordination, and marginalization. This effort is a legal political response and a manifestation of the role of the socio-political power of civil society in Indonesia, therefore this paper describes what and how the legal political efforts of civil society represented by several LAZ (Amil Zakat Institutions) respond through a legal effort called judicial review of Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management and proven successful with the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 86/ PUU-X/2012.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MK number 86/PUU-X/2012的裁决从Fiqih Siyasah的观点来看:通过2011年《管理Zakat》23号法律的法律政治反应
2011年颁布的《天课管理法》第23号(其中一部分旨在改进以前的法律(1999年第38号法律))之后,它仍然受到社区的反对,特别是私人的家庭天课机构。考虑到现有法律被认为不足以适应印度尼西亚天课的潜在发展,印度尼西亚共和国众议院第八委员会制定了关于天课管理的新法律。然而,由于法律没有。1999年颁布的第38号法令,先前规定了天课的管理,随后颁布的新法律反而引起了从业者、学者、公众、阿米尔天课机构(LAZ)和其他利益相关者之间的争议。证明存在这一争议的事实是向宪法法院/国会提出司法审查的申请。申请人根据四个要点对天课管理法中的若干条款进行了司法审查,即存在刑事定罪、集中、从属和边缘化。这种努力是一种法律上的政治回应,也是印尼公民社会社会政治力量作用的体现,因此本文描述了以几个LAZ (Amil Zakat机构)为代表的公民社会的法律政治努力是如何通过对2011年关于天课管理的第23号法律进行司法审查的法律努力来回应的,并通过宪法法院第86/ PUU-X/2012号决定的发布证明是成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention Strategies for the Crime of Adultery in the Light of Islamic Law Dirasah Muqaranah ‘an Hukm al-Zawaj Bayna Rudha’a Alban Bunuk al-Laban Fi Manzhur Fuqaha al-Aqdamin wa al-Mu’ashirin Marital Property in Marriages of Different Nationalities in Indonesia According to National Law and Islamic Law The Dynamics of Polygamy and Divorce in Muslim Countries Marital Rape in Indonesia in Maqashid Shari’ah Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1